Re: 'I'll put a bullet in your head': Fistfight nearly erupts on final day of content
You only think you proved that poster wrong.
No, I did, as did Ikari (in different ways). I'm not surprised you didn't bother to keep up.
To clarify, leaving out the details leading up to said comments creates a false narrative.
No, you still don't seem to get it. I'll explain again, in greater depth, and before you reply, actually take time to think about what I'm saying, rather than worrying about how to reply to what I'm saying.
The OP posted an article and then used the article to claim "Deranged Democrats". But, in the snippet he posted (and in the article), the only person who acted in a manner which could be considered anywhere close to deranged was the Republican (instigated the argument, as both I and Ikari explained, and threatened to shoot someone in the head). And, thus, I pointed out the erroneous and hyper-partisan nature of his post.
The fact I have explained this multiple times and you STILL don't get it only confirms what I've been saying to you from the beginning...if you don't understand, you should stop posting. You are clearly trying to argue the "details leading up to" justify the man's comments and, thus, he isn't deranged. While I disagree (at least in this instance, I cannot speak of the man in general and certainly ire increases the odds of one saying something stupid), that's not a valid response to what I said, as it is trying to argue against something I didn't say. My only point was that the only person who had done anything which would qualify as deranged was the Republican, ultimately making the point that the OP was being blindly partisan. Let me repeat that...the point of my post was about the partisanship of the OP, NOT about the Texas legislator. You trying to argue the "details" is pointless, as you're trying to argue over something different than what I was saying. Which means the "details leading up to" are irrelevant, for the reasons I've mentioned multiple times now. You're not even arguing about the right thing, which I've tried to get you to understand multiple times now. To provide a parallel example, if I were crafting an argument about who was better between LeBron and Jordan and you said, "But Robert Horry has more championships!" it would be equally as pointless to the comments you have made in this thread.
Just like I told the other poster:
My point
Your head
And, as I said, this is not some "high level" point I'm making, so the fact you still don't get it does not reflect well upon your ability to comprehend what you read. And I know you don't get it because if you were actually trying to craft an argument against what I truly said, you would have tried to demonstrate that some specific Democrat acted in a "deranged" manner, thus raising an argument that the OP wasn't engaging in hyper-partisanship. But you haven't attempted to do that...because you never understood what I was saying, just like the other poster didn't. All you have tried to do is defend the Republican from the attack you erroneously thought I was laying on him, which is why you keep talking about "details" "omissions" and other uesless things which have nothing to do with my point.
Allow me to say it once more...if you don't understand something, you should just stop posting. Don't get me wrong, usually I have no problem exposing the stupidity in the posts of others, but, as I said, I've just grown tired of reading posts from people who clearly don't know what they are talking about.
I'd love to see your next post admit you didn't understand. It would greatly increase my respect for you, little as I'm sure that means to you. But I suspect your next post won't say that, even though it's been blatantly obvious to anyone you did not understand.
