How many instances of obviously orchestrated hoaxes, which end up as nothing burgers, followed by brand new fauxrages do you need?
Do you recall the 3+ year of failed 'Russian collusion' hoax the Democrats and the media were pushing?
Remember a few days ago Jim Scutto from CNN claimed that Trump leaked information to the Russians that caused a CIA asset (spy) to be ex-filtrated from Russia?
Well, as it turns out, nothing about this 'story' which ended up being the truth:
- The spy's ex-filtration occurred during the Obama administration
- The concern which prompted the ex-filtration was the news media's intense coverage of the spy's alleged Trump dirt (not the Steele dossier)
- Even so, the Obama administration must not have considered the guy's life in danger, reporters found his home, listed under his own name, and if he was an important CIA asset, wouldn't he have gone into the witness protection program?
Yeah, so completely wrong there Jim. Guess your TDS and lack of ethics and standards got the better of you on that one.
Before that. What was it about Russian oligarch's co-signing Trump's loans from a bank?
Yeah, completely wrong there Lawrence. Guess your TDS and lack of ethics and standards got the better of you on that one.
And on, and on, and on, and on, and on, it goes with the so called 'news' (political propaganda) lying media, ignoring any journalistic integrity or ethics in the execution of their self-appointed 'Destroy Trump at all costs' mission, regardless of what it costs their credibility.
Trust me. Follow the 24-72 hour rule.
You can hate Trump, if you like.
You can like Trump, if you like.
Regardless of which it is, at least do it on a factual foundation, eh?
It would be ridiculous and incredulous to deny the obvious repeated pattern of behavior of the Democrats and their media accomplices described in this and many other threads on this forum.
If you can't manage the attention span, or get beyond your confirmation bias the media feeds you, I can't help you.