• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How to Remove Brett Kavanaugh

chew on? couldn't even imagine putting in my mouth....Vox is just poison :doh

You only put things you like in your mouth, like Trump? I suppose that has a certain logic to it, but it's pretty disgusting if you ask me.




PS: it really is amazing that you don't see what your admission that you only read what you want to hear says about your credibility. Or maybe "amazing" is the wrong word. Perhaps "obvious" would have worked better.
 
This is interesting.



That should give us all something to chew on.



I've got a better idea. Impeach the president, then nullify his presidency, such that all of his appointments are null, as well.
 
I've got a better idea. Impeach the president, then nullify his presidency, such that all of his appointments are null, as well.

Impeach=kill
nullify=kill
null=kill


We have seen this behavior before.

Democrat PAC Says 'Take Out' Steve Scalise, the GOP Rep. Shot by Crazed Leftist

'It's time to destroy Trump & Co.': Scalise shooter raged on Facebook

[video]https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-26-it-all-falls-apart-kavanaugh-accusers-recant-and-are-exposed-for-history-of-lies-and-psycho-behavior.html[/video]

Wrongly condemned MAGA hat-wearing teen speaks out as apologies come pouring in

Jussie Smollett case: Brothers apologize for roles in alleged fake attack

"We know (or so an anonymous leaker told CNN months later) the FBI used the dossier to secure a warrant to spy on an American citizen associated with Trump. And we know (or so anonymous sources told the Washington Post in February) that the FBI was trying to pay the opposition researcher who created the document, to continue to come up with info on Trump before the election. (The FBI refuses to confirm or deny if they did in fact pay him.) We also learned that the firm behind the dossier may have been funded by Russians.

But thanks to BuzzFeed, we now know that the document includes basic errors in fact, claims that are verifiably wrong, financially outlandish claims, sexually outlandish claims, implausible political claims, and contradictory information on business deals. CNN had the opportunity to verify the details prior to publication. They should have checked the easily confirmable or refutable details before they ran to press. If BuzzFeed hadn’t published the document, the dramatic framing the story’s authors chose would have been out there for months as opposed to exposed as laughable and dodgy almost immediately."

Only if one is not paying attention.

Even baby mice know enough to realize playing fair is in the best interest of everyone.

Why dont Progressive liberal leftist democrats?


There is a clear pattern of behavior.

A clear rejection of agreed-upon rules.

A breakdown of civility that has been building for many years.

The increase in progressive institutionalized death policies?

It is both interesting yet horrifying to witness the sheer scale of transference and projection involved in current events.



Honor Among Beasts

Just Wrestle: How We Evolved Through Rough
And Tumble Play


Sad that Dr. Panksepp passed away recently. Quite the neuroscientist.



It is unfortunate that some do not appear to be as socially aware as baby rats and rather than playing the game again must attempt to destroy the future for everyone.



This is your better idea.
 
This is interesting.



That should give us all something to chew on.

It sounds like all the judges should have something to worry about then.

If the other liberal judges are removed, then Trump can appoint all conservative judges.

Be careful what you wish for.
 
Impeach=kill
nullify=kill
null=kill


We have seen this behavior before.

Democrat PAC Says 'Take Out' Steve Scalise, the GOP Rep. Shot by Crazed Leftist

'It's time to destroy Trump & Co.': Scalise shooter raged on Facebook

[video]https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-26-it-all-falls-apart-kavanaugh-accusers-recant-and-are-exposed-for-history-of-lies-and-psycho-behavior.html[/video]

Wrongly condemned MAGA hat-wearing teen speaks out as apologies come pouring in

Jussie Smollett case: Brothers apologize for roles in alleged fake attack

"We know (or so an anonymous leaker told CNN months later) the FBI used the dossier to secure a warrant to spy on an American citizen associated with Trump. And we know (or so anonymous sources told the Washington Post in February) that the FBI was trying to pay the opposition researcher who created the document, to continue to come up with info on Trump before the election. (The FBI refuses to confirm or deny if they did in fact pay him.) We also learned that the firm behind the dossier may have been funded by Russians.

But thanks to BuzzFeed, we now know that the document includes basic errors in fact, claims that are verifiably wrong, financially outlandish claims, sexually outlandish claims, implausible political claims, and contradictory information on business deals. CNN had the opportunity to verify the details prior to publication. They should have checked the easily confirmable or refutable details before they ran to press. If BuzzFeed hadn’t published the document, the dramatic framing the story’s authors chose would have been out there for months as opposed to exposed as laughable and dodgy almost immediately."

Only if one is not paying attention.

Even baby mice know enough to realize playing fair is in the best interest of everyone.

Why dont Progressive liberal leftist democrats?


There is a clear pattern of behavior.

A clear rejection of agreed-upon rules.

A breakdown of civility that has been building for many years.

The increase in progressive institutionalized death policies?

It is both interesting yet horrifying to witness the sheer scale of transference and projection involved in current events.



Honor Among Beasts

Just Wrestle: How We Evolved Through Rough
And Tumble Play


Sad that Dr. Panksepp passed away recently. Quite the neuroscientist.



It is unfortunate that some do not appear to be as socially aware as baby rats and rather than playing the game again must attempt to destroy the future for everyone.



This is your better idea.


"Playing fair"? Try explaining what that means to Trump., because he clearly has no idea.
 
There was no proof of any of those accusations and in fact the supposed witnessed denied knowledge of the events. The only exception is Blasie Ford, who's witnesses did not corroborate her story. Lies, sex and videotape.

that's not what I was talking about. I was referring to ethics violations he committed while a federal judge. But you're wrong on both accounts as a number of other witnesses recently came forward and confirmed the original story.
 
The notion advanced in this article runs into the same roadblock the notion of impeaching Kavanaugh runs into...that is, the "good behavior" being talked about refers to good behavior while in office. It has nothing to do with behavior PRIOR to him taking office.

So...while this is all good intellectual discussion material, it is useless if one's objective is to remove Kavanaugh from office. Face it...he's there to stay.

Definitions of words and ideas seem to change when liberals are involved.
 
Waah, waah, Mommy those mean old Republicans stole my election :cry:

Sorry, Craig, nothing was stolen - the constitution was followed to the letter and the Wicked Witch of the East came up short.

People complaining about the electoral college remind me of people that buy a house next to a race track and then later complain about the noise.

It has never been a secret how elections are run in this country, but only after Trump wins, is the Electoral College not acceptable anymore. Just crazy stuff.
 
Trump isn’t a conservative.

Perhaps. But then you have to make the argument about how, in our two party system, that the GOP isn't the conservative party. Because lord knows they are all in for being the party of Trump and he is doing everything the GOP has strived for for decades now.
 
Kennedy? :lamo

Was that Freudian, seeing how Kennedy’s sudden resignation, leading to Kav’s appointment, also appears to be one of judicial misconduct?

I don't have a skin in the game, so I was going to stay out of this until I saw this precious little gem. I do love a conspiracy theory.

Tell us your theory: How is a Justice choosing to retire whenever he sees fit ever a case of "judicial misconduct?"
 
Not this week anyway. According to various sources he flip-flopped over his political affiliation at least five times before becoming 'president'.

You should question those sources.
 
Perhaps. But then you have to make the argument about how, in our two party system, that the GOP isn't the conservative party. Because lord knows they are all in for being the party of Trump and he is doing everything the GOP has strived for for decades now.

The GOP as an organization is not conservative. If they were, they’d be pushing to control federal spending, but it turns out they like big government, too.
 
The GOP as an organization is not conservative. If they were, they’d be pushing to control federal spending, but it turns out they like big government, too.

Understood. But they stole your conservative banner and are redefining it. Have been for a long time.
 
Here's the numbers on how many of the 9th districts cases are reversed by the Supreme Court. However, a detailed study in 2018 reported by Brian T. Fitzpatrick, a law professor at Vanderbilt University, looked at how often a federal circuit court was reversed for every thousand cases it terminated on the merits between 1994 and 2015.[11] The study found that the Ninth Circuit's decisions were reversed at a rate of 2.50 cases per thousand, which was by far the highest rate in the country, with the Sixth Circuit second as 1.73 cases per thousand.[12][11] Fitzgerald also noted that the 9th Circuit was unanimously reversed more than three times as often as the least reversed circuits and over 20% more often than the next closest circuit.[11]
 
it's hopeless.
Feels that way, at times, doesn't it? I don't disagree that current democratic leadership does inspire a sense of hopelessness. I just refuse to accept it. Liberal/Progressive/Democratic leaders think they are engaged in a debate match with their opponents, but their opponents believe they are in a death match with "the Left". And until WE understand that, we will continue to see the "trick" of Democrats enjoying MAJORITY support on almost every major issue....and turning that majority support (on the issues) into one 50%/50% or 49%/51% or election, after another. The truth is that voters are not very sophisticated (as a whole). And when given the choice, there is a large faction of the electorate that will always choose "strong and wrong" over "weak and right". That's how Reagan beat Carter. That's how Nixon beat Humphrey and McGovern. That's how W managed to stay close enough to win (with a little help) against Gore. And that's why Bush Sr lost to Clinton.

Liberals/Progressive/Democrats need to understand that this is a political death-match with their opponents...and begin to embrace it, and respond in kind...or resign themselves to the same pattern of election and societal results (one step forward, two steps back) we've seen over the last few decades. There are very, very dark forces at work in our nation today.

that would make an election loss more likely. just get some milquetoast candidate like Biden in there and vote the screaming carrot out. remember, we're not just talking about the orange idiot here. there's also Pence to contend with. you don't want him.
We disagree, here. But I certainly empathize with your sentiment. But, IMO, the election is not to be won by the so-called "white working class". They are gone. They are Trumpsters. We know, from study after study, that the single greatest indicator of support for Trump was NOT "economy", or "taxes", "trade", or "jobs", etc. It was racial resentment/cultural fear. So those voters (at least the vast majority of them) aren't going anywhere in 2020. They are Trump voters, because they are getting exactly what they wanted from this president, so far.

The 2020 election is going to be won (or lost) based on turn out from the so-called "Left", not from so-called "moderates" and "Centrists"-but from the people who stayed home in Milwaukee and Detroit and Tampa last election, because they didn't like Hillary and couldn't stand Trump. Trump won key states by razor thin margins that could be traced back to voters in the cities and the suburbs who did not vote. If African-American voters (esp. A-A women), LatinX voters, educated white voters (esp. white suburban women), Asian-Americans, young voters (i.e. millennials and older post-millennials) etc. turn out in 2012 or 2008 levels, that's a coalition that approaches 60% of the eligible voting population. Democrats will win by motivating their base, not by trying to appeal to the so-called "moderate independents" who are not really up for grabs this election.

the way to prevent a dictatorship is to vote the idiot king out, study how he used existing presidential power loopholes, and then revoke every last one of them using congress. if it makes you feel better, investigate him and prosecute after he can no longer use the presidency to obstruct. i could probably get behind that.
Agreed. With you 100%, here.
 
Last edited:
Feels that way, at times, doesn't it? I don't disagree that current democratic leadership does inspire a sense of hopelessness. I just refuse to accept it. Liberal/Progressive/Democratic leaders think they are engaged in a debate match with their opponents, but their opponents believe they are in a death match with "the Left". And until WE understand that, we will continue to see the "trick" of Democrats enjoying MAJORITY support on almost every major issue....and turning that majority support (on the issues) into one 50%/50% or 49%/51% or election, after another. The truth is that voters are not very sophisticated (as a whole). And when given the choice, there is a large faction of the electorate that will always choose "strong and wrong" over "weak and right". That's how Reagan beat Carter. That's how Nixon beat Humphrey and McGovern. That's how W managed to stay close enough to win (with a little help) against Gore. And that's why Bush Sr lost to Clinton.

Liberals/Progressive/Democrats need to understand that this is a political death-match with their opponents...and begin to embrace it, and respond in kind...or resign themselves to the same pattern of election and societal results (one step forward, two steps back) we've seen over the last few decades. There are very, very dark forces at work in our nation today.


We disagree, here. But I certainly empathize with your sentiment. But, IMO, the election is not to be won by the so-called "white working class". They are gone. They are Trumpsters. We know, from study after study, that the single greatest indicator of support for Trump was NOT "economy", or "taxes", "trade", or "jobs", etc. It was racial resentment/cultural fear. So those voters (at least the vast majority of them) aren't going anywhere in 2020. They are Trump voters, because they are getting exactly what they wanted from this president, so far.

The 2020 election is going to be won (or lost) based on turn out from the so-called "Left", not from so-called "moderates" and "Centrists"-but from the people who stayed home in Milwaukee and Detroit and Tampa last election, because they didn't like Hillary and couldn't stand Trump. Trump won key states by razor thin margins that could be traced back to voters in the cities and the suburbs who did not vote. If African-American voters (esp. A-A women), LatinX voters, educated white voters (esp. white suburban women), Asian-Americans, young voters (i.e. millennials and older post-millennials) etc. turn out in 2012 or 2008 levels, that's a coalition that approaches 60% of the eligible voting population. Democrats will win by motivating their base, not by trying to appeal to the so-called "moderate independents" who are not really up for grabs this election.


Agreed. With you 100%, here.

I'm not sure how an inept party can win against a party that is willing to stop at nothing to win. I'm already unimpressed with the field, though all are better than Mango the Clown. I have to hope that America's gag reflex will kick in and that he will be voted out. I see no chance of impeachment before then given the current data.
 
A mistake Democrats have already made, unfortunately. SCOTUS is now purely partisan, and stacked conservative, with people from conservative grooming, it's a joke. A free thinker is now considered liberal. A fundamentalist nutter is now considered conservative.

We already have a 5/4 decision about gun control, a partisan vote, that makes it extraordinarily more difficult to make laws more strict on gun control as a result. No senate, no house, no presidency, will change that. Focus all you want around SCOTUS, you'll fail. Well, unless we change the makeup of the court overtly, the way Mitch did when he denied Obama his appointment.

That's not to say all accusations or attempts to remedy Mitch's dirty tricks, with more dirty tricks (against Bart K.) , is right or wrong, just a comment about where the focus lies.
So because you don't like that the SC is following the constitution on the 2nd amendment that makes it a partisan decision.

I realize that you extreme bias make it hard for you to recognize it but the irony in your statement is rather funny.
 
So because you don't like that the SC is following the constitution on the 2nd amendment that makes it a partisan decision.
I realize that you extreme bias make it hard for you to recognize it but the irony in your statement is rather funny.

SCOTUS being obviously partisan, Mitch's hold on the Democratic nominee, etc., SCOTUS is as broken as the rest of it. It has nothing whatsoever to do with any one decision, it was simply one prominent example.
 
This is interesting.



That should give us all something to chew on.
whew boy , after the events of the last few days, I 'can't imagine how embarrassed you are about posting this. Maybe you can beg the moderators to remove it to avoid complete embarassment?
Kavanaugh Farce Explodes In A Shower Of Radioactive Clowns << Lawrence Person's BattleSwarm Blog

rump War Room

@TrumpWarRoom
Here's the Brett Kavanaugh BOMBSHELL&#55357;&#56483; the New York Times tried to bury:

Christine Blasey Ford's close friend Leland Keyser (also a Democrat) said she DOES NOT believe Ford's story. "It just didn't make any sense."

Keyser told the FBI that "Ford's allies pressured her" to LIE!dud-bomb.webp

LAFFRIOT!
 
I don't understand this whole Kavanaugh madness. We have a conservative president he's going to appoint conservative judges. Even if you could remove Kavanaugh, they would just appoint someone else. Maybe someone worse. Kavanaugh is not the worst conservative judge out there from a liberal perspective.

Aside from disagreeing with you about DJT being a conservative, I am pretty much on board with the rest of your comments.
 
Back
Top Bottom