• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Harris is the VP pick for Biden

What were you implying then? .

I didnt imply anything.

I said you were not being subtle, and you thought I was talking about race. This was after you went out of your way to pile as many different types of insults as you could, so you could be subtle.

Again, you're an open book, and all I need to do is read the lines.


------------------------

Thought had by person at the White House: If you can remember, man, woman, car, camera, TV, you are fit to lead a country and no one has anything to worry about
 
Fire off a policy you dont like about her that she has done and stop whining about nobody talking about it.

Or dont and whine

just off the top of my head:
Gun confiscation
Outlawing private insurance.
Outlawing fracking
 
Right a liberal dream candidate, more riots, more looting, more monument destruction, the left wing radicals on display

Biden VP pick Harris promoted group that put up bail for alleged violent criminals | Fox News

Every American's dream candidate, anti law and order, anti police, and pro radicalism

You really need to lay off the political porn, its needlessly raising your blood pressure. Neither Biden nor Harris are "left wing".... but, then again, you sit on the far right wing, the fuselage looks too far left for your taste.

You do realize that Harris is generally considered a winning pick by Democrats and most people that do not like Trump. She will drive votes to the polls, which is probably one of the reasons your blood pressure is up. But, it will make little difference, Biden would likely win with AoC as a running mate. (Interesting, perhaps Harris will run with her in 2024?)

Meanwhile, the next big thing to tackle will be the AG. Who will appropriately, yet compassionately handle the numerous crimes of the current administration in a way the brings justice and closure while minimizing division?
 
We heard all this in 2016. Biden isn't even close to Hillary's gravitas. His chance of winning is laughable.

I will bookmark your post so I can give you a good old "told you so" after the election. What states that Hillary won will Biden lose? I think NONE. Do you think that Trump will win all the states that he won in 2016? For example, will Trump win Michigan and PA? The RCP average has Biden up by almost 7%...even Florida Biden has a 5% lead...don't forget how much Trump has scared GOP voters into believing that voting by mail is bad so they'll have to risk getting sick to vote for Trump = lower GOP turnout = Biden wins!
 
Fire off a policy you dont like about her that she has done and stop whining about nobody talking about it.

Or dont and whine

Just like Obama, she's coming for their guns! She's going to take away their insurance! She's going to make us all Muslims! She's going to ban Christmas!

I look forward to 8 years of their hysterical paranoid posts.
 
I did list them, see #1 and #2. If you know of more please enlighten us. In my opinion her qualifications will mirror those of Obama and we all know how that turned out.

those aren't her qualifications. that's just what you and Rush and Sean will say.


you guys aren't stealth or anything.
 
"I support a mandatory gun buyback program”

You do know what "mandatory" means, don't you?

Harris: '''I support a mandatory buyback program'''

Of ASSAULT WEAPONS. Not all guns.

Who in their right mind is against that? There are already millions of restrictions in which guns the public can have.

Name ONE REASON for citizens to have Assault weapons. Most conservatives are already against it, look at the polls
 
Of ASSAULT WEAPONS. Not all guns.

Who in their right mind is against that? There are already millions of restrictions in which guns the public can have.

Would you, or someone, anyone, please define what they mean when they say "Assault weapons"? Newly-made machine guns are already generally illegal for sale to civilians; fully automatic weapons are generally illegal for sale or transfer unless they have been "grandfathered in."
 
I also believe Klobuchar would have been the best choice: she is much smarter than Harris is: while too left for me, doesn't come off as nutcase nor a quota pick

Quota pick? Like the GOP always does? You know, white men over the age of 60??? I do understand that there isn't a bench for Black or Latino men or women on a GOP national ticket - why do you think that is?
 
What a horrible thing, a world without guns. Imagine that, peace, just awful.
Just like a world without illegal drugs, and all the evil that results.
 
Did you believe in science back in 2016?

The RCP numbers are pretty similar to what they were at this point four years ago.

And with one poll showing Biden +13, and the next poll showing Biden +3...people need to wake up and realize there's something unreliable about the polls.

I can't believe Hillary had to write an entire book entitled "What Went Wrong?"

I can answer in one word...Polling.

You apparently do not understand polling, so you certainly do not understand the difference between an opinion poll and an election poll, so follow along:

Polling is a science. It is a combination with a hard science (mathematics) and a soft science (psychology/sociology). It is well tried and proven out over the years. Let me help you understand the difference between the statement that nearly 53% of all Americans think Trump is unfit for office and your perception that the polls got it wrong in 2016.

1) there is a big difference between an election poll and an opinion poll. What I cited is an opinion; what you cited was an election poll. An election poll is an opinion poll AND a projection of turn-out. Where election polls typically fail is on projection turn-out, not the opinion side. Projection turnout attempts to predict human behavior on a specific future date. That behavior can ultimately be affected by weather, election management issues, which are outside the purview of the survey.

Numbers lie all the time: How political polls work - TechRepublic

2) Election polls also are dynamic because you are measuring as of a date certain using historic data. There are underlying shifts that aren't always caught.

3) A presidential election poll consists of 51 election polls. Polling in most states is reasonably sketchy. Trump won an electoral victory by winning a couple of states by less than 1 point. Turnout in those particular states was less than expected (see #6 below)

4) The final polling of the 2016 election had Hillary up by 3 points nationally, she won by 2 points.. pretty much spot on.
RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

5) Fivethirtyeight.com, the gold standard of poll aggregation, gave Hillary a 67% chance of winning. If the weatherman says there is a 33% chance of rain and it rains, was he wrong? If the weatherman says there is a 10% chance of rain and it rains, was he wrong?

6) Turn-out in the 2016 election was far, far less than forecast. What the Russians did in connection with their interference in the 2016 election was try to suppress turnout, particularly in the black community. That seems to have been effective and likely shifted the election in favor of Trump.

Russia targeted black voters in attempts to suppress Democrat turnout in presidential election, Senate report says | The Independent

The opinion portion of the 2016 election poll with spot on; the turnout forecast (the hard part) was the bust (see #4).

So, sorry, the fact remains (unless you have veriable data refutes my point), nearly 55% of the country believe Trump is incompetent and therefore a danger to America and Americans. He is not going to be re-elected.
 
Smart move to ignore the Lewis funeral and say nothing, remember Lewis didn’t attend the inauguration. Why pander to the left? Trump would have got smoked by msm anyway if he went.
Trump approval rating with black people has been increasing and his policies helped them.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Rasmusse...proval-rating-black-voters-holds-36-approval/

Not saying he will get 36% of the vote but very possible for him to get 12%

You just described why not attending wasnt a smart idea...to make points with the black community, to have recognized and supported Lewis's work. He could have really made an appeal to the black community...and passed. :shrug:


This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
just off the top of my head:
Gun confiscation
Outlawing private insurance.
Outlawing fracking

Show me links. I want context before we jump down this road.
 
Of ASSAULT WEAPONS. Not all guns.

Who in their right mind is against that? There are already millions of restrictions in which guns the public can have.

Name ONE REASON for citizens to have Assault weapons. Most conservatives are already against it, look at the polls

Because the AR15 is the number one sporting gun platform in the country. There are are least 5 million of them in the hands of Americans. And she, and evidently you, propose the police going door to door to confiscate those 5 million rifles. How do you think that is going to end?
 
Worked up? :lol:

Your opinion on this matter carries no weight.


Odd then that you'd respond to me.


I'm not going to tell you you're full of **** but it is a bit suspect.
 
Not only that, she was an anchor baby, not a natural born citizen. Neither parent was an American citizen.

I hope that goes to SCOTUS.

A Harris birther! :lamo
 
What a horrible thing, a world without guns. Imagine that, peace, just awful.



Coming from the same crowd that believes we don't need police and a group hug will solve all the world's problems.
 
that sort of sums up the difference between us and you. You all are excited that a second rate politician has been nominated based purely on her race.

2nd rate? Never lost an election (did come in 2nd in a Dem primary in 2003 but won the runoff to become SF DA). Do 2nd rate politician's win every election, especially ones that are statewide, especially in the largest state in the union?
 
What a horrible thing, a world without guns. Imagine that, peace, just awful.

Well, Biden and Harris seem to be your dream ticket. I'm sure they will usher in world peace just as the Nobel Prize winner and Biden did, the first time around.
 
Back
Top Bottom