- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
- Messages
- 13,179
- Reaction score
- 3,662
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
The US has a firearm homicide about every 54 minutes.
And most of those are gang related homicides, your point?
The US has a firearm homicide about every 54 minutes.
So they want to see the 2nd amendment repealed so that gun control is both constitutional, effective and enforceable.
You clearly have something to say - so say it or shut up.
Gun owners want the 2nd amendment repealed? Don't know where you got that crazy idea.
they just care about their cause of ultimately banning guns.
We don't have a gun problem we have a violence problem. And there is a solution, it's just not easy.
from Rupert Murdoch's Sky TV
Why are white men more likely to carry out mass shootings?
Between 1982 and 2017, 92 of 95 mass shootings in the US were carried out by men, and only three involved a woman.
The article refers back to Statista where you could find this graph with the headline: Number of mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and November 2018, by shooter's race and ethnicity
View attachment 67248451
I COMPLETELY disagree. If we implement the same law that made Japan safe, we would absolutely see a reduction in crime.
No...it wasnt the gun bans. It was the imposition of massive prison sentences for anyone using a firearm in the commission of a violent crime and then their version of our RICO statutes that attached guilt to anyone connected to the criminal enterprise which resulted in them going to prison for the same amount of time as the perpetrators that made the difference in Japan.
We need mandatory minimum prison sentences for ANYONE that willfully uses a weapon in the commission of a violent crime. 40 years plus the original sentence...minimum. Lock up enough perpetrators...watch the violent crime rate plummet.
from Rupert Murdoch's Sky TV
Why are white men more likely to carry out mass shootings?
Between 1982 and 2017, 92 of 95 mass shootings in the US were carried out by men, and only three involved a woman.
The article refers back to Statista where you could find this graph with the headline: Number of mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and November 2018, by shooter's race and ethnicity
View attachment 67248451
Correct. So if a gangbanger was trying to murder 5 but only killed 2 it's not a mass murder.
Which is why there is no solution. Our 2nd amendment prohibits us from implementing that kind of system. We have no solution.
And the people he kills would most likely be other gangbangers, so he's doing us a favor, although he would be doing us a bigger favor if he did kill 5 instead of 2.
It bothers me not that people own guns. It does bother me when people murder each other. Especially young kids.
And the people he kills would most likely be other gangbangers, so he's doing us a favor, although he would be doing us a bigger favor if he did kill 5 instead of 2.
The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with passing mandatory minimum prison sentences. THAT is what made the difference in Japan. If you study Japans history, even after their gun ban was passed, gun violence, especially with their gangs was still a problem. Importation of illegal guns was still a problem. The problem of gun violence is not solved by bans. It is solved by prison sentences...very long prison sentences...for violent perpetrators and where gang activity is involved, the same statutes used to attack the Mafia should be employed.
Not only does the U.S. have more guns than any other nation on the planet, but it also has far more gun deaths than any other developed nation — six times the homicide rate of neighboring Canada, more than seven times as many as Sweden, and 16 times as many as Germany.
So, yes.... gun control reduces gun deaths.
To the best of my knowledge Japan always had a gun ban, or at least they have for as long as guns have been around.
The numbers vary from year to year but they stay fairly consistent. And you find those numbers significantly different? You find the fact that 13.2 per 100k in the UK manage to hang themselves in the UK somehow equates to the 15.2 number in the US (where firearms are used in a majority) but NOT to the 18.5 in Japan where firearms arent used at all?I didn't and would never, claim that making it more difficult to obtain a firearm would STOP suicides, I simply wrote that it might REDUCE the number as many of the methods used to kill oneself take more time and often allow others to intervene.
Sorry, UK suicide rate is approximately 13.2 per 100,000. The US suicide rate is approximately 15.5 per 100,000. Japan's suicides are 18.5 per 100K
Russian rate is over 30 per 100K -- looks like Putin and the oligarchs are doing a great job running their country into the ground.
Gun deaths are just one sort of premature death. Adam Lanza could've just easily gotten a truck and drove it into the crowd of students when school got out.Guns weren't a motivator for Adam Lanza who killed 26 people, 20 of them were five and six year old kids. But the gun was there for him to pick up right in his own home. Because of Sandy Hook, my state implemented stricter gun legislation, some of the strictest in the nation. there were 92 gun homicides per year in Connecticut on average prior to the new gun laws and last year there were 53. That’s the lowest homicide rate ever, according to state data, and Connecticut has one of the lowest gun death rates in the country.
So, ban guns and seize all illegal guns.
The USA now has British levels of gun ownership.
What's the problem.
You're just parroting excuse # 3
When you rape you're hurting somebody, when you own guns you aren't.is that like saying the USA has laws outlawing rape but rapes still occur...and this makes people who promote legislation to punish rapists and sex offenders look stupid.
But it might reduce the number of suicides, almost 60% of suicides in America are by a self-inflicted gunshot.
Wow. You really struggle with facts. You find an INCREASE from 19 in 25 years to 25 in 22 years an indicator that the Australia ban has REDUCED mass murders??? And you just ignore the fact that your argument that the gun ban REDUCED mass murders in the UKL has been completely destroyed?Sounds like excuse # 3 coming up:
You can't ban guns in the USA because there's just so many of them.
It's in our culture...it's impossible for Americans (the minority with guns that is) to live without them
Excuse # 3 is ridiculous
OK, and your point ?
That the Australian gun ban has reduced mass shootings ?
Correct me if I got you wrong, are you saying that there wasn't much of a gun problem in Australia and the UK before their respective gun control legislation ?
Well yes you may have a point that Aussie and British gun crime was nowhere near as bad as it is currently in the USA...but their respective governments decided to act anyway.
So the conclusion is that gun control is even MORE necessary in the USA than it was in Australia and the UK.
The difference is the 2nd amendment.
Repeal the 2a and we're in business to resolve America's gun problem.
And most of those are gang related homicides, your point?