• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Grenfell Towers doesn't come crashing down, crashing down, crashing down [W:57]

camlok said:
Do you deny that nanothermite is a US government military discovery?
Click to expand...

You falsley claim the buildings collapsed at freefall. This despite being shown you are incorrect.
You are a science denioer and it is documented all over this forum
Why do you deny science Cam?
 
Oh Look everybody.
Cam is attermpting to dodge his own false claims by trying to make this about something else
Why am I not surprised?
 
One debate-killer fact about the reason Grenfell Tower is still standing is that it's made of concrete. Poured onsite comprising a central concrete core comprising the elevators and escape stairs, with concrete floors radiating off. There's rebar inside the concrete, but there's no steel skeleton to fail.
 
mike2810 said:
Do you deny that many scientist state Jones and NHarrit are wrong?
Click to expand...

Yes, that is absolutely false, mike. No proof, EVER, from you or your science denying cohorts.

Do you deny that nanothermite was discovered by US government military scientists in the 1990s?
 
camlok said:
Do you deny that nanothermite is a 1990s US government military discovery?
Click to expand...

Do you maintain your false claim that the building collapsed at freefall.
 
Manc Skipper said:
One debate-killer fact about the reason Grenfell Tower is still standing is that it's made of concrete. Poured onsite comprising a central concrete core comprising the elevators and escape stairs, with concrete floors radiating off. There's rebar inside the concrete, but there's no steel skeleton to fail.
Click to expand...

Didnt I already tell you about bringing facts and logic into a CT discussion?
 
camlok said:
Yes, that is absolutely false, mike. No proof, EVER, from you or your science denying cohorts.

Do you deny that nanothermite was discovered by US government military scientists in the 1990s?
Click to expand...

Just because you state something does not make it true. Provide your source.

Explain why Jones who worked with Harit stated the super nanothermite has an ignition point above 1700degrees, but NH sample ignited at 800.

Sorry, but many creditable scientist state Jones and NH are wrong.
 
camlok said:
Do you deny that nanothermite was discovered by US government military scientists in the 1990s?
Click to expand...

I don't give a **** when where or by whom, it wasn't aboard the planes full of fuel and people that crashed into the towers you are obsessed with. Leave the London tower (there's only ONE Grenfell Tower by the way)
 
Manc Skipper said:
I don't give a **** when where or by whom, it wasn't aboard the planes full of fuel and people that crashed into the towers you are obsessed with. Leave the London tower (there's only ONE Grenfell Tower by the way)
Click to expand...

And yet these same things were found in the rubble of WTC7, which wasn't hit by any plane?

Do you deny that nanothermite was discovered by US government military scientists in the 1990s?

Do you deny that nanothermite was found in WTC dust?

Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions, iron microspheres were found in WTC dust?

Do you deny the molten/vaporized steel found in the rubble at WTC?

Do you deny the vaporized lead found in the dust at WTC?

Do you deny the molten molybdenum found in the rubble at WTC?
 
camlok said:
And yet these same things were found in the rubble of WTC7, which wasn't hit by any plane?

Do you deny that nanothermite was discovered by US government military scientists in the 1990s?

Do you deny that nanothermite was found in WTC dust?

Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions, iron microspheres were found in WTC dust?

Do you deny the molten/vaporized steel found in the rubble at WTC?

Do you deny the vaporized lead found in the dust at WTC?

Do you deny the molten molybdenum found in the rubble at WTC?
Click to expand...

It's not about you.

Or your fantasy world
 
Really, it's an amusing demonstration of dissonance and denial, if they are different.

The towers collapse at free fall speed in an hour plus, the cheapo building in England is still standing. Nobody wants to calculate how much heat it would take to weaken all the steel in the structure so that it could collapse at the same instant, but they still claim science when defending the delusion.

It is easier to fool a man than it is to later explain to him how he has been fooled. :lol:
 
Thoreau72 said:
Really, it's an amusing demonstration of dissonance and denial, if they are different.

The towers collapse at free fall speed in an hour plus, the cheapo building in England is still standing. Nobody wants to calculate how much heat it would take to weaken all the steel in the structure so that it could collapse at the same instant, but they still claim science when defending the delusion.

It is easier to fool a man than it is to later explain to him how he has been fooled. :lol:
Click to expand...

To calculate "how much heat it would take to weaken all the steel ", would be foolish and a waist of time. ALL the steel didn't need to be heated.

Let us discuss your belief:
How much super nanothermite was needed to assist the mini neutron bombs.
How many neutron bombs and where were they placed?
Why was thermite needed if neutron bombs were used?
 
mike2810 said:
To calculate "how much heat it would take to weaken all the steel ", would be foolish and a waist of time. ALL the steel didn't need to be heated.

How much super nanothermite was needed
Click to expand...

You seem to be denying the US government scientists discovery of nanothermite, mike, or you are mocking them. Which is it?

What size "waist" should we calculate for?

The amount of nanothermite that was needed is the amount that caused the twin towers to fall at accelerating speed. They probably should have used less but then they risked a topple, which they couldn't have - a topple then the reminder starting back up from the remaining explosives.

The amount of nanothermite that was needed for WTC7 is the amount that caused the first 2.25 seconds, 105 feet, 8 storeys of free fall.
 
Manc Skipper said:
It's not about you.

Or your fantasy world
Click to expand...

So you don't deny any of those things. That's good to know because if you did you would be a science denier, an anti-truther.
 
camlok said:
You seem to be denying the US government scientists discovery of nanothermite, mike, or you are mocking them. Which is it?

What size "waist" should we calculate for?

The amount of nanothermite that was needed is the amount that caused the twin towers to fall at accelerating speed. They probably should have used less but then they risked a topple, which they couldn't have - a topple then the reminder starting back up from the remaining explosives.

The amount of nanothermite that was needed for WTC7 is the amount that caused the first 2.25 seconds, 105 feet, 8 storeys of free fall.
Click to expand...

What does the discovery of nanothermite by the military as you state have to do with the towers?. If you are claiming military grade thermite was used, then provide your evidence. You seem to not realize that Jones debunked his own partner by stating military nanothermite ignites above 1700 degrees. NH sample chip ignited at 800. Way below the claimed threshold.

Your answer to how much thermite is nonsense. One might as well say, the amount of fire needed to collapse the towers was the amount of fire that occurred. So it is settled then, the towers collapsed due to collisions, damage and fire. :lamo

Once again cam. Just because something exists does not mean it was used. Why don't you challenge T72 on his claim their was also mini neutron bombs? Or do you believe the same as T72?
 
mike2810 said:
To calculate "how much heat it would take to weaken all the steel ", would be foolish and a waist of time. ALL the steel didn't need to be heated.

Let us discuss your belief:
How much super nanothermite was needed to assist the mini neutron bombs.
How many neutron bombs and where were they placed?
Why was thermite needed if neutron bombs were used?
Click to expand...

Of course it would be a "waist" of time, Mr. I Don't Like Science or Spelling". When one is deluded to the point that 15 years later he still doesn't know how he's been deceived, it would be a horrible waste of time because it would blow his world view into smithereens. Such a "waist of time" calculation would clearly demonstrate one of the many failures of the official story.

Be in denial, and be proud, eh?
 
Thoreau72 said:
Of course it would be a "waist" of time, Mr. I Don't Like Science or Spelling". When one is deluded to the point that 15 years later he still doesn't know how he's been deceived, it would be a horrible waste of time because it would blow his world view into smithereens. Such a "waist of time" calculation would clearly demonstrate one of the many failures of the official story.

Be in denial, and be proud, eh?
Click to expand...

You still dont know how truther sites are decieving you? That is sad, because we point it out all the time
 
camlok said:
You seem to be denying the US government scientists discovery of nanothermite, mike, or you are mocking them. Which is it?
Click to expand...

Do you deny that the US govt discoverd and used atomic weapons?
Guess thet throws your thermite BS out the window it had to be nukes as HD claims!!!

FYI that was sarcasm being used to point out how illogical your argument is. Normally people couldf figure that out on their own but since you are a truther.........
 
Thoreau72 said:
Of course it would be a "waist" of time, Mr. I Don't Like Science or Spelling". When one is deluded to the point that 15 years later he still doesn't know how he's been deceived, it would be a horrible waste of time because it would blow his world view into smithereens. Such a "waist of time" calculation would clearly demonstrate one of the many failures of the official story.

Be in denial, and be proud, eh?
Click to expand...

Yes, we know you do not like "science or spelling". You must be talking to about yourself again.

If you are so correct then why does so many CD supporters disagree with your conclusions?

Noted: Your refusal to answer questions regarding the nukes.
How much super nanothermite was needed to assist the mini neutron bombs.
How many neutron bombs and where were they placed?
Why was thermite needed if neutron bombs were used?

No answer from you must mean you don't have a clue.
 
Quag said:
You still dont know how truther sites are decieving you? That is sad, because we point it out all the time
Click to expand...

He has a yuge emotional investment in the delusion. It's hard to admit how gullible he's been.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom