• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Graham on the impeachment inquiry: 'I made my mind up. There's nothing there'

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
112,063
Reaction score
102,213
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Graham on the impeachment inquiry: 'I made my mind up. There's nothing there'

a2Ve5-HT


11/10/19
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) doubled down on his defense of President Trump amid the ongoing impeachment inquiry, arguing there's "nothing there" in the call between Trump and Ukrainian leaders to suggest the president did anything wrong. "You make your mind up about the phone call. I made my mind up. There's nothing there," Graham said in an interview Saturday with KCCI, a Des Moines CBS affiliate. Graham has been one of Trump's staunchest allies defending the president's actions amid the impeachment inquiry. He told CBS News last week he won't read the transcripts released of witness depositions. "I've written the whole process off," he said.

Lindsey Trump - Throw him off the Senate jury and then kick him out in 2020 for not doing his job.
 
Lindsey Graham has essentially announced that what he will do once impeachment reaches the Senate is jury nullification. Making up your mind to not convict while stating outright that you will not look at the evidence is the textbook definition of jury nullification.

What Graham is communicating to the American public is that the evidence is really, really damaging to Trump.
 
Yeah, because there is any chance that that soulless and spineless worm was going to say something different....
 
Idiot leftists have been doing their ridiculous Maxine Waters led "peach45" dance since Nov 2016. Graham is right...this is just more of the same. The same ****ing retards that advocate for his impeachment now are the same ****ing retards that have been trying to fabricate ridiculous reasons all along. There may be enough rat morons in congress to impeach. He will not be removed. He will likely win reelection. Rats will again lose their pathetic ****ing minds.
 
A juror in the trial has rendered his verdict before the trial has even begun. That's insane.
 
Idiot leftists have been doing their ridiculous Maxine Waters led "peach45" dance since Nov 2016. Graham is right...this is just more of the same. The same ****ing retards that advocate for his impeachment now are the same ****ing retards that have been trying to fabricate ridiculous reasons all along. There may be enough rat morons in congress to impeach. He will not be removed. He will likely win reelection. Rats will again lose their pathetic ****ing minds.

Might wanna change your lean from independent to sycophant.
 
A juror in the trial has rendered his verdict before the trial has even begun....

...after announcing that he wouldn't look at the evidence.
 
Might wanna change your lean from independent to sycophant.
Give me a high crime and Im right there with you. the only sycophants are the ****ing rat idiots that have been screaming for Trumps impeachment since before he took office.
 
Lindsey Graham has essentially announced that what he will do once impeachment reaches the Senate is jury nullification. Making up your mind to not convict while stating outright that you will not look at the evidence is the textbook definition of jury nullification.

What Graham is communicating to the American public is that the evidence is really, really damaging to Trump.
I agree with every word. But realize that you are punishing him for being more candid than the rest of Trump's lackeys. They will pretend, while doing everything they can to sabotage the House Managers.

The only question is whether the House Managers should bother to show up for the Senate farce, when the Senate intends frustrate and stymie their efforts at every turn. The President is just as impeached whether the trial is held or not and public will be as educated as we can make them, in House public hearings where Pelosi controls the pacing, the narrative, and what evidence is admitted.
 
Last edited:
I agree with every word. But realize that you are punishing him for being more candid than the rest of Trump's lackeys. They will pretend, while doing everything they can to sabotage the House Managers.

I see no reason to commend someone for being corrupt just because he's doing so openly.
 
Give me a high crime and Im right there with you. the only sycophants are the ****ing rat idiots that have been screaming for Trumps impeachment since before he took office.

Theres a high crime right in your face, but you don't want to see it. Only a sycophant says it isn't there.
 
I see no reason to commend someone for being corrupt just because he's doing so openly.

Whats that old statement about being in the land of the blind and having one eye, again?

Sad part is when the guy with one eye flatly refuses to open that ****er.
 
Somebody has a sex tape on Lindsey Graham. That's the only thing that explains how off the rails he has gone since John McCain died.
 
Give me a high crime and Im right there with you. the only sycophants are the ****ing rat idiots that have been screaming for Trumps impeachment since before he took office.

What do you call the attempt to extort a foreign entity into publicly announcing the opening of an investigation into ones chief political rival, which is designed to help electoral chances in the upcoming election, in exchange for the release of military aid appropriated by Congress and an official State Visit? In virtually all circles, when blind partisanship is removed, this is considered the very definition of a "High Crime" and is completely in line with what our Founders feared the most. And was instrumental in their writings regarding impeachment. What do you call this, if not a High Crime?
 
I see no reason to commend someone for being corrupt just because he's doing so openly.
I see no reason to punish him for his candor. There will be about 4O others with the same view.

The only question is whether the House Managers should bother to show up for the Senate farce, when the Senate intends frustrate and stymie their efforts at every turn. The President is just as impeached whether the House managers prosecute the case or not, and public will be as educated as we can make them, in House public hearings where Pelosi and friends controls the pacing, the narrative, and what evidence is admitted. If the Senate wants to do its job, it can appoint some Democratic senators to prosecute. If it does not, it can table the articles, and not bother us all with false pretense.
 
Idiot leftists have been doing their ridiculous Maxine Waters led "peach45" dance since Nov 2016. Graham is right...this is just more of the same. The same ****ing retards that advocate for his impeachment now are the same ****ing retards that have been trying to fabricate ridiculous reasons all along. There may be enough rat morons in congress to impeach. He will not be removed. He will likely win reelection. Rats will again lose their pathetic ****ing minds.
The only ****ing retards are those idiot Trump cultists that believe all of his lies.
 
I agree with every word. But realize that you are punishing him for being more candid than the rest of Trump's lackeys. They will pretend, while doing everything they can to sabotage the House Managers.

The only question is whether the House Managers should bother to show up for the Senate farce, when the Senate intends frustrate and stymie their efforts at every turn. The President is just as impeached whether the trial is held or not and public will be as educated as we can make them, in House public hearings where Pelosi controls the pacing, the narrative, and what evidence is admitted.

His is actually how trump could possibly be removed, the 2/3rds vote is not of every member of the Senate. It is of those present.

I can see a lot of Republicans abstaining and not showing up...
 
I agree with every word. But realize that you are punishing him for being more candid than the rest of Trump's lackeys. They will pretend, while doing everything they can to sabotage the House Managers.

The only question is whether the House Managers should bother to show up for the Senate farce, when the Senate intends frustrate and stymie their efforts at every turn. The President is just as impeached whether the trial is held or not and public will be as educated as we can make them, in House public hearings where Pelosi controls the pacing, the narrative, and what evidence is admitted.

The American public already understands it. The problem you have is that liberals lied about collusion for 3 years so no one believes you. Add to that the fact that you have had leftist kooks crying impeachment since the day Trump was elected so no one takes you seriously. And finally, you are denouncing a partisan Senate while applauding a partisan House so no one listens to such rank hypocrisy.
 
I’ll say it again, McCain would be ashamed of what his best friend has become. A spineless Trump ass kissing sycophant. :2no4:

You know John McCain do you? Or are you just able to speak to the dead?
 
You know John McCain do you? Or are you just able to speak to the dead?
Among other politicians, I followed McCain’s service in the Senate (and Congress before) for decades and have a fair understanding of the man. I’m sure that my belief is shared by many others.
 
What do you call the attempt to extort a foreign entity into publicly announcing the opening of an investigation into ones chief political rival, which is designed to help electoral chances in the upcoming election, in exchange for the release of military aid appropriated by Congress and an official State Visit? In virtually all circles, when blind partisanship is removed, this is considered the very definition of a "High Crime" and is completely in line with what our Founders feared the most. And was instrumental in their writings regarding impeachment. What do you call this, if not a High Crime?
What did you call it when Biden openly bragged about denying support unless they fired a prosecutor? And since the US policy is that there is no foreign aid for corrupt governments, it would certainly be appropriate top ensure the government you are working with isnt corrupt. Similarly, since there was no "unless you do this I wont do that" then there is no quid pro quo.

This is all just more of the same...idiot leftists doing their idiot leftist peach 45 dance. And they have been doing it non stop since Nov 2016. This is just the latest iteration. And dont worry...when this one fails the tards will start up with something else.
 
Back
Top Bottom