- Joined
- Jan 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,920
- Reaction score
- 1,385
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Trump's big mouth always gets him in trouble. The man does not care about optics.
So the problem with Trump is that his Racism is outloud?
Trump's big mouth always gets him in trouble. The man does not care about optics.
Trump's big mouth always gets him in trouble. The man does not care about optics. He should have left well enough alone, (let Pelosi duke it out with them) but now he once again is the big white villain, and they are the left's little brown victims. Who knows though? He does seem to be aptly pointing out the NEW face of the Democrat Party; anti-American extremism. Maybe there is a method to his madness... these four women are not going to be silenced. Is he goading them? Maybe that's his plan.
I would bet what you consider racism and what others consider racism are not the same.
Do you consider Pressley's comment racist regarding "we don't need black faces that don't want to be a black voice...……"
Rep. Ayanna Pressley: "We Don't Need Any More Brown Faces That Don't Want To Be A Brown Voice" | Video | RealClearPolitics
Seems she does not believe in MLK's dream of judging a person not by the color of their skin....
How do you know whats inside the mind of a racist? Personal experience?
I have a link to the racist handbook for you. This tweet says it all. But if you're younger than 50 you possibly won't understand the significance of this tweet.
View attachment 67259976
There you go, "If you hate our Country, or if you are not happy here, you can leave!" This is not a new or imaginative phrase on Trump's part. This phrase has been a political approach for decades. It's meant to appeal to ordinary people, those people that feel they've been left behind and believe that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups. It's an appeal to the populous that bitterly resents people that they believe are living 'on the dole', people that are sucking up their tax dollars. The phrase is an appeal to the red states who bitterly complain that black people are lazy and just want to stay home, not work and collect entitlements. And yet, the majority of those 'entitlements' are actually going to red states.
That statement, "go back to where you came from" is pure, unadulterated racism, you don't need a handbook.
How do you know what's in Donald Trump's mind?
Its hard to ignore the fact that his supporters are forever having to qualify his statements. Trump, as usual, has been directly quoted, and his supporters are, as usual, having to say "yeah, but...." Unable to see through his BS, one would think they would at least tire of making excuses for him.
There is no question that Trump's statements have been racist, NONE. So I have a question for GOPers out there, can you still defend Trump without also defending his obvious racism. Most of us knew he was a racist from his not allowing blacks to rent apartments in his buildings to his there are good people on both sides statement. These latest statements have made his racism clear, but I know many of you will still believe. So I once again ask the question, can you still defend Trump without defending his racism?
Its kind of an open book.
There is no question that Trump's statements have been racist, NONE. So I have a question for GOPers out there, can you still defend Trump without also defending his obvious racism. Most of us knew he was a racist from his not allowing blacks to rent apartments in his buildings to his there are good people on both sides statement. These latest statements have made his racism clear, but I know many of you will still believe. So I once again ask the question, can you still defend Trump without defending his racism?
Now, you sound just like the racists I knew from the south in the 60's. Exactly, just as Trump's statements are straight out of the racist's handbooks from the 60's. I thought this country would never go back there, but apparently we have. And your answers that those who call out racists are the real racists is also from the same playbook from the 60's. It never changes does it.
No you didn't. You laid out typical mindless smears of Sessions Bannon, Flynn and Miller. You guys have but one card in your deck and that's the race card. You play it so often it has no meaning. The administration is not racist, neither are its supporters on the right. What is true is that liberals have nothing better to do than lie about it.
She lived in the sixties. Lol!
I lived in the 60's too. Lots has changed in 50 years. The left acts like this is 1969. Its 2019. The racism of the 60's and 70's is dead and buried. They just keep digging up the corpse because they have nothing else to run on and no other way to keep minorities in their tent.
How do you know whats inside the mind of a racist? Personal experience?
It is also fascistic, as it says that any ideas that don't conform to Trump's are unAmerican. The idea that only ine narrow poliyical view js legitimate goes against the very idea of our constitution This reminds one of Trump's utterly clueless response when asked about western democracy.
Sessions, Bannon, Flynn, Miller, Gorka... all racist dogs. When you lay down with dogs, you're going to get fleas. Trump even had the unmitigated gall to announce in a tweet this morning that he "doesn't have a racist bone in his body." Yeah, right.
The racism has been resurrected, sorry to say. We're going backwards thanks to Trump's racism.
Sorry, but you claiming those men are racist doesn't make them racist. It makes you dishonest. But, we already knew that.
You are blind out of your own choosing. You're the one that's dishonest and too small to be able to admit when you're wrong.
You accuse people of being racists without evidence. That's dishonest. But you aarent interested in honesty.
Actually, her comment is all about character.
I gave you multiple instances that proves both Trump and his father Fred - who was sued for discrimination, is a racist. I don't know what you consider racism, but Trump reeks with it.
The thread assumes Trump is racist, which he is not. That is the false assumption in this thread.
Bringing up stuff from over 20-30 years ago. Rehashed attacks that were already debunked in 2016.