Global Warming is Worse than we Thought

[Quaestio]

Yep.

That's about as coincidental as CO2 is.

And that's another example of why no-one takes your non-science blathering seriously.

 

[Lord of Planar]

No, it's not. It's an example of you just making up nonsense and calling it 'science'.

It's not nonsense at all. You're seeing it that way proves you are clueless to the sciences involved about these debates, and just regurgitate what your prophets of AGW tell you.

 

[Media_Truth]

It's not nonsense at all. You're seeing it that way proves you are clueless to the sciences involved about these debates, and just regurgitate what your prophets of AGW tell you.

What has changed with the sun, that is causing a steady increase in warming for the last 40 years? Climatologists study this in great detail. They acknowledge some minor changes, but nothing that accounts for anything close to the temperature changes that we are seeing.

 

[Tim the plumber]

What has changed with the sun, that is causing a steady increase in warming for the last 40 years? Climatologists study this in great detail. They acknowledge some minor changes, but nothing that accounts for anything close to the temperature changes that we are seeing.

How do they account for the peeriods when the world has bee much warmer than now during this interglacial?

Edit; any chance of any electrical engineering knowledge coming out of you?

 

[Lord of Planar]

What has changed with the sun, that is causing a steady increase in warming for the last 40 years? Climatologists study this in great detail. They acknowledge some minor changes, but nothing that accounts for anything close to the temperature changes that we are seeing.

Nothing.

The sun has had minor decreases.

It is around this decade that equalization has finally caught up with the dimming sun.

Why is that so complex to understand by someone who wishes us to believe he is an electrical engineer?

I simply don't believe you contention, since you don't understand simple charge and discharge dynamics.

What do you really do for a living? Flip burgers?

 

[Lord of Planar]

How do they account for the peeriods when the world has bee much warmer than now during this interglacial?

Edit; any chance of any electrical engineering knowledge coming out of you?

Unlikely. There is no way hes en electrical engineer.

 

[Surface Detail]

How do they account for the peeriods when the world has bee much warmer than now during this interglacial?

Edit; any chance of any electrical engineering knowledge coming out of you?

Where are you getting your information from? According to most temperature reconstructions, the world has never been warmer than now during this interglacial.

 

[Tim the plumber]

Unlikely. There is no way hes en electrical engineer.

Yep. Why claim stuff like that when you know that somebody will challenge you? He must know that there are people here who do know what they are talking about in basic electronics.

All Media fart has achieved is to make sure we know he has very little attachment to truth.

 

[Tim the plumber]

Where are you getting your information from? According to most temperature reconstructions, the world has never been warmer than now during this interglacial.

Well this proxy saya that the holocene optimal in Europe was about 2c warmer than now with the tree line being at 400m above present;

https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1365-2745.13077

There are a lot of other proxies showing the holocene optimal.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Yep. Why claim stuff like that when you know that somebody will challenge you? He must know that there are people here who do know what they are talking about in basic electronics.

All Media fart has achieved is to make sure we know he has very little attachment to truth.

I've been doing electronics since 1968.

 

[Threegoofs]

I've been doing electronics since 1968.

Your area of expertise.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Your area of expertise.

One area of several areas of expertise.

 

[Threegoofs]

One area of several areas of expertise.

I bet.
Like climate science. Or neurosurgery.

 

[Into the Night]

Don’t worry.

The deniers will let us know that it’s not warming at all, and besides the warming is no big deal.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. Only changes in the Sun or changes in the Earth's orbit affect temperatures on Earth. Any changes are beyond yours or anyone else's control.

Sea level isn’t rising at all, and besides, the rise is no big deal.

It is not possible to measure the global sea level. You have no reference point. You cannot control the level of the ocean either.

Glaciers aren’t melting at all, and besides, the melting is no big deal.

Some glaciers are receding. Others are advancing. Meh. Who says they have to stay exactly the same?

It’s like the old joke about the resort: the food is terrible, and the portions are so small!

Non-sequitur fallacy. No one eats glaciers, the ocean, or the Sun.

 

[Into the Night]

And remember. It’s not warming, but the warming that’s not happening is going to be awesome because I get chilly in the winter.

You could always move south.

 

[Into the Night]

Weather isn’t climate, but deniers who were weather technicians understand climate better than scientists.

What is to understand about 'climate'? Climate simply is.

 

[Into the Night]

What has changed with the sun, that is causing a steady increase in warming for the last 40 years?

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

Climatologists study this in great detail.

Climate 'scientists' deny science and mathematics.

They acknowledge some minor changes, but nothing that accounts for anything close to the temperature changes that we are seeing.

We aren't seeing any. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

 

[Into the Night]

Where are you getting your information from? According to most temperature reconstructions, the world has never been warmer than now during this interglacial.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. Temperature reconstructions are manufactured data.

 

[Into the Night]

I've been doing electronics since 1968.

Almost as long as me. What area do you like to work in? I prefer controls and instrumentation.

 

[Into the Night]

I bet.
Like climate science. Or neurosurgery.

Climate isn't a science or a branch of science.
You need more than a spoon for neurosurgery.

 

[Jack Hays]

[h=1]The Pause Deniers Are Back – More Than 200 Peer Reviewed Studies Are Wrong[/h]Posted on 20 Dec 18 by JAIME JESSOP • 2 Comments
That’s basically how Roger Pielke Jr. describes the latest effort to erase the Pause, or Hiatus, or Slowdown. New study claims that more than 200 peer-reviewed climate science papers are fatally flawed & the result of “political pressure from climate contrarians” https://t.co/UqU5r1Hq9X — Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) December 19, 2018 The New Left Wing … Continue readi

 

[Media_Truth]

[h=1]The Pause Deniers Are Back – More Than 200 Peer Reviewed Studies Are Wrong[/h]Posted on 20 Dec 18 by JAIME JESSOP • 2 Comments
That’s basically how Roger Pielke Jr. describes the latest effort to erase the Pause, or Hiatus, or Slowdown. New study claims that more than 200 peer-reviewed climate science papers are fatally flawed & the result of “political pressure from climate contrarians” https://t.co/UqU5r1Hq9X — Roger Pielke Jr. (@RogerPielkeJr) December 19, 2018 The New Left Wing … Continue readi

Wow - more than 200 peer reviewed studies are wrong. And here I thought all those scientists from the National Academy of Science, the NOAA, NASA, and the Royal Academy had something credible to say about climate change. I guess your blog knows better.

 

[Jack Hays]

Wow - more than 200 peer reviewed studies are wrong. And here I thought all those scientists from the National Academy of Science, the NOAA, NASA, and the Royal Academy had something credible to say about climate change. I guess your blog knows better.

It is the AGW advocacy position that the 200 peer-reviewed studies are wrong. You have it backwards. Try reading next time.:lamo

 

[Threegoofs]

It is the AGW advocacy position that the 200 peer-reviewed studies are wrong. You have it backwards. Try reading next time.:lamo

Let us know when a major scientific organization endorses your denier view.

 

[Jack Hays]

Let us know when a major scientific organization endorses your denier view.

The "major scientific organizations" authored and published the 200 papers under attack. You should have read the material because you have the story backwards.:lamo