- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 134,507
- Reaction score
- 31,492
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
1) Apologies
2) Minutes of last meeting
3) Some people just happen to be gay
4) AOB
![]()
... and subverting children...
1) Apologies
2) Minutes of last meeting
3) Some people just happen to be gay
4) AOB
![]()
Then this entire conversation is moot. Who cares about nature? It is not relevant.
But face it....if nature was the law....a lot of us would not be breeders
... and subverting children...
But nature... and genes... and procreating what is best for humanity...
But nature... and genes... and procreating what is best for humanity...
No, but clearly homosexual men and women aren't winning the gene pool contest are they?
What if 98% of humans were homosexual rather than the current 2%? How would that work out in nature?
None of my teachers in any of my schools showed us pictures of their fiancees, husbands, or wives.
They weren't supposed to bring their personal lives into the classroom. It would have been deeply unprofessional.
In point of fact, I knew very few of my teachers' first names and nothing about their marital status. Students had no business knowing, and teachers had no business discussing it.
While I can't say whether Ms. Bailey was trying to indoctrinate children into acceptance of homosexuality, I can say that any teacher engaging in this kind of unprofessional conduct--homosexual or not--should be censured or fired.
If this kind of thing is now tolerated in schools, that's one more reason to choose private schools with higher standards, or--better still--tutors for homeschooling.
Not necessarily. Some people by procreating weaken the species
But gay people can procreate just like anyone else, and often do...
What subversion? Acknowledging that gay people exist and some of them get married? Would you rather lie in a vain attempt to hide that fact from children or should it only be mentioned with the mandatory condition that "they're evil sinners who must be condemned and shunned"?... and subverting children...
My teachers used to bring their kids to class and it was our privilege to take turns entertaining them. Learning that our teachers have family lives only makes them more relatible.
I'm sorry you feel differently.
That is part of the agenda... to pass on gay genes and create a gay population.
We have evolved past that... we have massive brains and an opposable thumb.
What subversion? Acknowledging that gay people exist and some of them get married? Would you rather lie in a vain attempt to hide that fact from children or should it only be mentioned with the mandatory condition that "they're evil sinners who must be condemned and shunned"?
I know. Plenty of room for gay people
A population of supermen!!!!! Lol
Because heterosexuals created a society in which they could thrive...
Are gay men anti-women?
Sounds like you're the one plotting here. I can only hope you keep it online.I don't believe in sin and they should not be shunned... but it should be understood that they are out there plotting.
Nope. Lol
I don't believe in sin and they should not be shunned... but it should be understood that they are out there plotting.
Sounds like you're the one plotting here. I can only hope you keep it online.
Then why did you talk about supermen?
That is part of the agenda... to pass on gay genes and create a gay population.
Let's say they are. So what?