• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Gay marriage adds complexity in swing states[W:166; 763]

Navy Pride said:
Maybe to put some extra money in peoples pockets and stimulate the economy Like Reagan and JFK did.......What a novel concept.........
Click to expand...

So you wanna go to the tax levels of JFK and Reagan?
 
CriticalThought said:
Which Romney are you talking about? The one we see today or the one that existed 10 years ago?

Honestly, you consider Obama to be "pro abortion"? What is with you and the politically charged language? It seems like you get off on being as partisan as possible. Yeah, we get it. You drank the red kool aid and you loved it.
Click to expand...


He is definitely pro abortion even though if it came to a vote while he was in the senate he probably would have voted Present...
 
Navy Pride said:
Maybe to put some extra money in peoples pockets and stimulate the economy Like Reagan and JFK did.......What a novel concept.........

By the way did you send your tax cut back for the last 10 years?
Click to expand...



Kennedy and Reagan did two different things. Kennedy cut taxes Reagan transfered the tax burden to the lower part of the income ladder. Reagan also turned us into debtor nation spending widely on the tax payers credit card.
 
Last edited:
Navy Pride said:
He is definitely pro abortion even though if it came to a vote while he was in the senate he probably would have voted Present...
Click to expand...

You do know he has kids. He didn't abort them. Doesn't sound like something someone who is "pro abortion" would do.
 
Navy Pride said:
I want to make the Bush Tax cuts permanent......Is that simple enough for you?
Click to expand...

Yeah. You want to drastically cut defense spending and cut your veterans benefits in half, in order to pay for those tax cuts. Right?
 
Navy Pride said:
Maybe to put some extra money in peoples pockets and stimulate the economy Like Reagan and JFK did.......What a novel concept.........

By the way did you send your tax cut back for the last 10 years?
Click to expand...

My family was unaffected by the cuts. And the extra money definitely explains for the lack of buying power.
 
CriticalThought said:
You do know he has kids. He didn't abort them. Doesn't sound like something someone who is "pro abortion" would do.
Click to expand...

I wish it was that simple..If that were the case there would be no Roe V Wade.
 
Navy Pride said:
Huh, you did not get a tax cut?
Click to expand...

The cuts did not affect the yearly earnings of my family. This is why your view of it being so helpful is flawed. It put money in the pockets of people who already had money in their pocket. It did no good and actually caused harm.
 
TheLastIndependent said:
The cuts did not affect the yearly earnings of my family. This is why your view of it being so helpful is flawed. It put money in the pockets of people who already had money in their pocket. It did no good and actually caused harm.
Click to expand...

Your going to have to explain that one to me........everyone that paid income tax got a tax cut because everyones tax bracket was lowered...I went from 28 percent to 15 percent........
 
Jetboogieman said:
Must you keep calling Obama beautiful?
Click to expand...

He is beautiful except for those elephant ears....If he stays out of the wind he will be fine...........Now show me where Romney wants to cut defense instead of throwing **** against the wall and hope something sticks.
 
Navy Pride said:
He is beautiful except for those elephant ears....If he stays out of the wind he will be fine...........Now show me where Romney wants to cut defense instead of throwing **** against the wall and hope something sticks.
Click to expand...

What does this have to do with the topic at hand?
 
Top Cat said:
You do realize Romney wants to cut defense spending?
Click to expand...

No he doesnt. he might want to cut veteran's benefits but he will continue to maintain this empire and probably take us to war with iran.
 
Navy Pride said:
He is beautiful except for those elephant ears....If he stays out of the wind he will be fine...........Now show me where Romney wants to cut defense instead of throwing **** against the wall and hope something sticks.
Click to expand...

Here are the facts per Romney's website: he wants to cap defense spending at a minimum of 4 % GDP. That would put military spending at about 600 billion(15T * .04). Military budget for 2010 was 663B(not finding 2011 numbers quickly, not looking hard). Since Romney's issues page(National Defense) is less than clear, whether he would cut the military budget or not is unsure, but the gist of the page suggests not.

You can thank me later NP.
 
Redress said:
Here are the facts per Romney's website: he wants to cap defense spending at a minimum of 4 % GDP. That would put military spending at about 600 billion(15T * .04). Military budget for 2010 was 663B(not finding 2011 numbers quickly, not looking hard). Since Romney's issues page(National Defense) is less than clear, whether he would cut the military budget or not is unsure, but the gist of the page suggests not.

You can thank me later NP.
Click to expand...

Minimum is the operative word.
Meaning it could go higher, but never lower.

www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=13281

And his minimum is billions over the base budget of 2010 & 2011
You can thank me now.
 
Last edited:
Redress said:
Here are the facts per Romney's website: he wants to cap defense spending at a minimum of 4 % GDP. That would put military spending at about 600 billion(15T * .04). Military budget for 2010 was 663B(not finding 2011 numbers quickly, not looking hard). Since Romney's issues page(National Defense) is less than clear, whether he would cut the military budget or not is unsure, but the gist of the page suggests not.

You can thank me later NP.
Click to expand...

Sorry you need to give me a non bias link......I don't believe anything he says on his web site...........Like I told you before.......Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me...........He is the biggest liar in the history of the presidency......He even told the Rev. Wright, you can't lie but I can....
 
Navy Pride said:
Sorry you need to give me a non bias link......I don't believe anything he says on his web site..........
Click to expand...

WTF?!! You dont believe anything Romney says on his own website. LMAO that has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard! You are saying Romney lies on his website?!

You people are CLASSIC!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom