- Joined
- Jan 21, 2017
- Messages
- 8,518
- Reaction score
- 2,430
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Ayup. Worthless post.
Ayup, worthless reply.
Ayup. Worthless post.
Friend says Trump is considering 'terminating' Mueller
https://www.yahoo.com/news/friend-s...-terminating-mueller-235925758--politics.html
WASHINGTON (AP) — A friend of the president says Donald Trump is considering "terminating" special counsel Robert Mueller.
Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy tells Judy Woodruff of "PBS NewsHour": "I think he's considering perhaps terminating the special counsel. I think he's weighing that option."
The White House did not immediately respond to questions about Ruddy's claims.
Under current Justice Department regulations, such a firing would have to be done by Attorney General Jeff Sessions' deputy, Rod Rosenstein, not the president— though those regulations could theoretically be set aside.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL ............... the train wreck that keeps on giving ............ choo choo ............
Are you actually unable to follow the logic? :roll:
Take Clinton out of the scenario and insert Susy.
" she didn't break the law because no charges were ever filed".
A person can break a law and never have charges filed.
Susy murders Steve. Susy broke the law.
Steves body is never found. No evidence Susy murdered Steve.
Susy is not charged with a crime.
Can you follow?
The isolation of existing down under is a long way for any of us to go never mind follow.
We are talking about the guy who fired Comey. The direct consequence of the firing was Trump being presented with Meuller. Youse over there might think for a moment to consider who and what could follow if Trump fired Meuller.
We know not only does Trump want to fire Meuller, Trump knows he must fire Meuller or else to the Trump presidency. The only question is whether Trump will do it or try to do it.
Comey and Meuller are two FBI guys who are lawyers born in Manhattan and who consider Russia the principal strategic adversary of the United States. This is a world view each shares with the FBI, CIA, DIA, NSA and so on to include the Pentagon.
Your idiosyncratic concerns are immaterial, irrelevant, marginal at best to the national security of the United States to include of your own country down there.
Way to abso****inglutely miss the point...
The post is a long way from reality both spatially and cognitively.
Reread the thread title plse thx. Perhaps that can be a re-starting point for you.
Try to think plse thx: Trump-Comey-Meuller-Putin and the national security of the United States.
What in the **** are you talking about... i made a simple non.partisan point. Your response is whack a doodle...
News, every administration throws out trial balloons. Nothing new there
You are posting about Hillary Clinton to a thread about Trump and Meuller and actual charges filed by the office of special counsel with one guilty plea entered and a trial pending against Manafort and Short for "Conspiracy Against The United States."
Admittedly all of this and more is a long way from New Zealand so I'm trying to introduce some proper focus to your posts thx.
Again your armchair lawyering doesn't change the FACT that even under Trump she didn't break the law because no charges were ever filed. Again she didn't break The law no matter how hard you want it to be.
Trump is more corrupt than Hillary or obama combined but you are ok with that. You are ok with republicans being secretive on their bills, you are ok with trump lying, you are ok with trump having a media blackout on press conferences and you are ok with a president with strong Russian ties in his whole administration. In other words you excuse the most corrupt president like trump so you have zero credibility.
wow. What a disconnect.
I'm sorry you are unable to process your obsession with Clinton. Maybe some therapy will do you good.
I am talking purely logic here.
" she didn't break the law because no charges were ever filed".
A person can break a law and never have charges filed.
She has been under the microscope of two FBI directors, numerous hearings, and now under a Trump administration who placed cabinet level positions that could go after her. Even under all those conditions NO charges have been filed. Yes, you have an obsession with her and YES she didn't break any laws because no charges were filed. Even under trump, NO charges have been filed. Face facts, you got nothing but sour grapes and an unhealthy obsession with Clinton.
Are you actually unable to follow the logic? :roll:
Take Clinton out of the scenario and insert Susy.
" she didn't break the law because no charges were ever filed".
A person can break a law and never have charges filed.
Susy murders Steve. Susy broke the law.
Steves body is never found. No evidence Susy murdered Steve.
Susy is not charged with a crime.
Can you follow?