• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News Doesn't Want to Say Porn Star + Stormy Daniels




1. Yeah? And CNN, MSNBC, etc. are all using it to bash the President; while both she and her lawyer are feeding them salacious ammunition both to keep her in the public eyes and to gain sympathy for her "legal case."

2. IMO that's what you are all up in arms about...in your mind EVERYONE should agree with you and EVERYONE should bash the President because it is the "moral" thing to do. :roll:

3. I don't buy into sex scandals unless they are directly related to a criminal case at bar (rape, child molestation, etc.). No, what happens between two consenting adults is their business. :coffeepap:






1. Are you telling me that a President sleeping with a pornstar deserves no bashing???? Would you give Bill Clinton the same pass?

2. Actually I find it very hard to find people who agree with me politically speaking. I do not have a tribe, or a party, or a side. I analyze and block the partisan nonsense of my way or the highway. If the conservatives had an intelligent position on anything, I would join them. I would be there on that soap box with Sean Hannity et al screeching about liberal corruption. (Indeed I have in saner times). Same goes with the liberals. If they had a message (which I don’t see at all), then I would be out there knocking on doors and fighting for that message. But all I see from liberals are impeach trump, and protests (and I’m not one for protests.)

3. This just goes to show to show how much out of touch you are. It's much more than a "sex scandal." It probably violated campaign finance laws, violated evangelical christian values, violated his marriage vows to Melania, used conspiracy, and threats to silence a private citizen etc... You would know this if you didn't watch Fox News.
 
All legal an honest.
Can't even begin to say the same thing about our ***** grabber in Chief.

It's a sad day in the USA when the majority of the world finds a sex worker more credible than the "president" of the USA.

I thought Monica Lewinski had more credibilty than that pig Bill Clinton
 
1. Are you telling me that a President sleeping with a pornstar deserves no bashing???? Would you give Bill Clinton the same pass?

Did you miss the part in the post you replied to where I clearly indicate I DID give Bill Clinton a "pass," at least when it came to Monica Lewinski? :shrug:

3. This just goes to show to show how much out of touch you are. It's much more than a "sex scandal." It probably violated campaign finance laws, violated evangelical christian values, violated his marriage vows to Melania, used conspiracy, and threats to silence a private citizen etc... You would know this if you didn't watch Fox News.

No, you HOPE it involves "campaign finance laws," and that there is proof he "used conspiracy and threats to silence a private citizen."

Although Stephanie Clifford "alleges" she was threatened, she didn't balk at taking the "hush money" when offered now did she? Money all gone, now she wants more from whatever source she can get it...interviews, book deals, lawsuits...etc.

Violation of marriage vows; like Melania had no idea this type of thing has been going on before? You must have a very low opinion of her intelligence. Now I can't swear to this but IMHO she married him for all sorts of contractual reasons...none of which involved "true love."

And "evangelical Christian values?" Really? That is your argument? :doh:

I do know all the allegations, how could one miss any as they keep getting harped on in the MSM, Hollywood, and in this very Forum?

However, I simply don't buy the narrative you keep pushing, which (IMO again) is more a result of TDS than reality.
 
Did you miss the part in the post you replied to where I clearly indicate I DID give Bill Clinton a "pass," at least when it came to Monica Lewinski? :shrug:



No, you HOPE it involves "campaign finance laws," and that there is proof he "used conspiracy and threats to silence a private citizen."


And "evangelical Christian values?" Really? That is your argument? :doh:

I must have missed the Clinton thing, but still. I have high hopes for Michael Avenatti. He knows what he's doing and he has a LONG TERM strategy to win the case. A media game that's beaten Trump every single time, and I wouldn't be surprised if he was involved in the Cohen raid. Who knows what the two sides shared with each other?

And yes, as a Christian. I don't want a President (in his past or now) to ever sleep with pornstars. Is that so wrong??? Principles shouldn't be overlooked as some type of joke.
 
Fox News frequently also ignores Trump dumb twitter habits, and never criticizes him for them. Also during weekends it seems Trump watches Fox News all day. There's been times when I'm watching the network, and then an hour later the President tweets something one of the hosts says. Sometimes it's live tweeting too.

Now the stormy thing is interesting, but before you say, it's VOX! blah, blah, blah fake news. Please try to actually argue a literate point and try to find a time when Fox News has mentioned Stormy. Also an analysis about all the times Fox News mentioned Clinton VS Stormy would be helpful in your arguments that Vox and not Fox is fake news.





https://www.vox.com/2018/3/21/17144180/fox-news-stormy-daniels-porn-trump

I do realize that in the article CNN's Stormy graph looks like a erect penis. That's hilarious. But that's probably just because they're the ones who've been getting all the interviews w/her and avenatti. I'm sure Fox could fight for them if they wanted to. It's clear they don't.

May be they do it out of respect for Ms Daniels? You know, even porn stars are human.
 
Lying about the affair and possibly intimidation and using campaign funds to shut someone up about the affair is entirely different. I've said about clinton that he should have looked starr right in the eye and said "Yep I had the affair, what are you gonna do about it" and that would have shut Starr up completely and he would have had nothing. Same thing for Trump. It looks like Trump might have gone through extraordinary means to accomplish this and if so he is going down.

If the lawyer was the one who handled the intimidation that could be jail time and if he flips on Trump there might actually be a Pence/Haley run in 2020 instead.



Yip, just like Clintons " I did not inhale" bit.

With Clinton I always felt he took very bad advice from his handlers.

With trump be just lies instinctively...
 
covering them up with campaign funds and intimidating people before an election is damn sure illegal. That is what is at hand here. I know Trumpbots don't care because they would polish Trump's knob if it was in front of them but decent folk do still care.

Why so worried about campaign funds, I'm certain none of that campaign money was sent by you!
You don't really think they used campaign funds to silence Porny Stormy do you?

Trump could nominate Obama for a position and the left would vote against it.
The hate for anything Trump does outweighs every other consideration
Quite a group this new brand of lefties! Rather unusual bunch.
 
No, in order for you to be right, there has to be no mention in Fox News.

For my argument to be true there only has to be mention of her in some Fox News reports.

Okay:

Stormy Daniels claims she?s free to talk about Trump, after payment admission | Fox News

Stormy Daniels claims she was threatened to stay silent about alleged Trump affair | Fox News

Stormy Daniels coy about whether she really signed denial statement on Trump affair | Fox News

Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti an 'adrenaline junkie' who learned at the knee of Rahm Emanual | Fox News

They are just not making as big a story about it as the rest of the MSN, maybe because (IMO) they are not trying to emulate the National Enquirer about something that has nothing to do with his being President? :shrug:

BOOM! Excellent!
 
I saw a similar study, but it stated that FAUX News just focused on Stormy's history and career, and said nothing about the prospect of Trump's involvement in Hush money.
 
Fox News frequently also ignores Trump dumb twitter habits, and never criticizes him for them. Also during weekends it seems Trump watches Fox News all day. There's been times when I'm watching the network, and then an hour later the President tweets something one of the hosts says. Sometimes it's live tweeting too.

Now the stormy thing is interesting, but before you say, it's VOX! blah, blah, blah fake news. Please try to actually argue a literate point and try to find a time when Fox News has mentioned Stormy. Also an analysis about all the times Fox News mentioned Clinton VS Stormy would be helpful in your arguments that Vox and not Fox is fake news.





https://www.vox.com/2018/3/21/17144180/fox-news-stormy-daniels-porn-trump

I do realize that in the article CNN's Stormy graph looks like a erect penis. That's hilarious. But that's probably just because they're the ones who've been getting all the interviews w/her and avenatti. I'm sure Fox could fight for them if they wanted to. It's clear they don't.

The double standard applied from the Right to Trumps all around dishonesty and piccadellos is astounding. If Obama farted in an elevator Fox and Friends would be in an uproar. But banging porn stars and paying hush money are best ignored. I always suspected the Righties,especially the Christan Right are the biggest hypocrites in our political system. The moral high ground they crowed about since 1980 has been exposed for what it has morphed into, a fraud.
 
Back
Top Bottom