• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Floyd transcripts. Just before his death.

Aurora said:
The Tara Show - 7-13-20 - Hour 1 | RADIO.COM start 16:50 into audio.


Evidently Floyd (from the Tara show) was foaming and bleeding from the mouth and saying "I can't breathe" many times and long before he ever went on the ground (which was at Floyd's request because he was having a paranoia attack and did not want to be alone in the cop car). He said he had been "hooping" earlier. He was putting meth and Fentanyl in his rectum. It going to be hard as hell to convict any of these cops on anything.

George Floyd transcript: Read it in full here Read the full George Floyd police camera transcript

Transcripts of body camera recordings from Minneapolis police were made public Wednesday, giving a more detailed...


I can't read it due to AdBlocker.
Click to expand...

Floyd was a career criminal who beat pregnant women, karma caught up to him. Don't care
 
jamesrage said:
Has the previous condition of a victim ever gotten a murderer off the hook? "Well your honor my client claims the victim was already bleeding so my client shouldn't punished for shooting the victim to death." I realize many defense attorneys are degenerate scum who knowingly try to get guilty people off the hook, but have any of them ever tried claiming the victim was already suffering from a prior condition before being murdered by his client?
Click to expand...

I would hope a very thorough toxicology has been done on him to see what and how much was in him. How does that play on his medical state.
 
jamesrage said:
Regardless if Floyd was foaming at the mouth or faking an medical condition it does not excuse the cop for putting his knee on someone's neck like that and for as long as he did it. What you posted amounts to saying well the murderer won't get punished for shooting the victim to death if that victim was already suffering from a stab wound prior to being shot. Has there ever been a case of a murderer getting off the hook because he his victim was already bleeding?
Click to expand...

The prosecution and the defense will be calling in their experts. One juror has to say not guilty. Then the state will keep retrying him until he is convicted.
 
bullseyelqcs said:
So let me get this straight....

Man tells you that he is having trouble breathing, and you and this officer seem to think the way to deal with that was to further limit his ability to breathe?
Click to expand...

And you know how much pressure was applied to his neck?
 
TheDoctorWasIn said:
It is baffling to me that anyone can interpret these "transcripts" as being beneficial to Chauvin and the others, in terms of their criminal charges.
Click to expand...

Will it cast doubt in the jurors mind that Chauvin was out to do him in and the three were accomplices. Most thought the "I can't breathe" was from the knee on neck. We know now he was stating that well before he was on the ground. Floyds request.
 
Citizen said:
OK, if all of that is true, there was still no reason to put his knee on Floyd’s neck. There was no restraining or medical purpose for that. Foaming from the mouth or drugs in the rectum did not cause his death. You do not put your knee on the neck of a man that already says he cannot breathe. No one has ever died from a panic attack. I am sure that Police have been trained to deal the people having panic attacks. Placing your knee on their neck is not one of them
Click to expand...

You need to understand that there is a difference between a "panic attack" and a drug overdose.
 
armycowboy said:
Why are you defending a cop, who knelt on a man's neck for 9 minutes?
Click to expand...

I'm not defending him. There obviously is more to this story. People like Ari Melber are tainting the media coverage to convict him before the trial ever starts.
 
TheDoctorWasIn said:
...so?

How does that mitigate the criminal actions of the police?
Click to expand...

Outside the court of public opinion, there has been no FORMAL determination of criminal acts by the police.

From the very beginning this case has looked like one of, at most, negligence on the part of one cop. There was no sign whatsoever of intent to cause harm, malicious or otherwise.
 
Lutherf said:
You need to understand that there is a difference between a "panic attack" and a drug overdose.
Click to expand...

He did not die from a drug overdose. Read the autopsy
 
Lutherf said:
Outside the court of public opinion, there has been no FORMAL determination of criminal acts by the police.

From the very beginning this case has looked like one of, at most, negligence on the part of one cop. There was no sign whatsoever of intent to cause harm, malicious or otherwise.
Click to expand...

There is also no evidence that Floyd was killed because of racism.
 
Aurora said:
Will it cast doubt in the jurors mind that Chauvin was out to do him in and the three were accomplices. Most thought the "I can't breathe" was from the knee on neck. We know now he was stating that well before he was on the ground. Floyds request.
Click to expand...
Whether or not Chauvin was "out to do him in" is entirely irrelevant to the charges he is facing.
 
Lutherf said:
Outside the court of public opinion, there has been no FORMAL determination of criminal acts by the police.

From the very beginning this case has looked like one of, at most, negligence on the part of one cop. There was no sign whatsoever of intent to cause harm, malicious or otherwise.
Click to expand...
You are correct that the trial of these men has not yet occurred.

But all of them face numerous criminal charges - none of which require "intent to harm".
 
Aurora said:
The Tara Show - 7-13-20 - Hour 1 | RADIO.COM start 16:50 into audio.


Evidently Floyd (from the Tara show) was foaming and bleeding from the mouth and saying "I can't breathe" many times and long before he ever went on the ground (which was at Floyd's request because he was having a paranoia attack and did not want to be alone in the cop car). He said he had been "hooping" earlier. He was putting meth and Fentanyl in his rectum. It going to be hard as hell to convict any of these cops on anything.

George Floyd transcript: Read it in full here Read the full George Floyd police camera transcript

Transcripts of body camera recordings from Minneapolis police were made public Wednesday, giving a more detailed...


I can't read it due to AdBlocker.
Click to expand...
Nah, they have Chauvin on video killing Floyd. The other former officers might escape a prison sentence. Chauvin won’t.
 
Yeah, he died of a heart attack from a drug overdose complicated by panic. You've skimmed the story if you think otherwise. And, not only was the neck hold in the PD training manual, but it's also a listed as nonlethal. Chauvin will likely be acquitted(60-70% chance), the other offices 90-95% chance. They took on way more than they could chew on the change. Maybe, he well should have been convicted(on a more reasonable change), I have no doubt he was an overly aggrieve officer with his record. I tell you one thing for sure, that reality is not on the good people that think BLM are racist BS peddlers and the mob should review the facts. This is the common reality of politicalizing something is inherently chosen for being divisive rather than uniting. Worse, as the truth gets out - juries are only more likely to protect aggressive cops.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
Nah, they have Chauvin on video killing Floyd. The other former officers might escape a prison sentence. Chauvin won’t.
Click to expand...

Of course he will go down. He has already been tried, found guilty and must be destroyed.
 
TheDoctorWasIn said:
Well, no. That's the whole point.

Chauvin has been charged under subdivision 2 - which, as you just pointed out, is titled "Unintentional Murders".
Click to expand...

I linked to the statute. It's unintentional homicide but requires an intent to inflict harm.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom