Father Kills 14 Year-Old Son: 'He Would Rather Have a Dead Son Than a Gay Son'

[Fenton Lum]

Here's the complete record for clarity.

I'm not sure what your "some of you" reference means, but you made xenophobic or racist remarks and inferences about the victim and his family, stood by them, and then refused to explain your thought process.

I'm not convinced there is a your thought process at play here, at all.

 

[Bodi]

We've seen your shtick pard, you're an irrelevant laughing stock, cheers.

Laughing with me are far more than the handful laughing at me... which means they are laughing at your posts, the majority.

 

[Fenton Lum]

I continue to be amazed.

You probably shall be for some time to come by the looks of things.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Laughing with me are far more than the handful laughing at me... which means they are laughing at your posts, the majority.

Have a lovely day with yourself and your need for external validation.

 

[Bodi]

I continue to be amazed.

Even after being explained to you? Wow. There needs to be an award for this type of thinking.

 

[RamFel]

You mean you dont have ANY factual or logical evidence, NONE. You haven't be able to present one factual thing that backs up your claims hence why your lost so bad and many posters mocking your claims

lets see the evidence you have. I'll bet you don't have anything as good as what I have.

 

[Bodi]

Have a lovely day with yourself and your need for external validation.

uh-huh... enjoy your day attempting to feel superior with yourself for taking intent out of context after making an ignorant insult and then not backing it up with... anything. :lol:

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

No I didn't.

Even if it wasn't sarcasm those comments are not xenophobic in the slightest... well, if one is a easily triggered SJW looking to be offended, I guess, but in reality? Nope.



except you just quoted me doing just that...

...

Questioning the origin of a person's name with your perceived intention is xenophobic.

Despite my copious quotes, you have continuously refused to state your intention in your own words.

 

[RamFel]

Gay is not something you do. It is something that some people are.

Some animals are, too.

Which calls into question the notion that it's a choice. You are what you are.

Again where is the proof? Something scientific please.

 

[ecofarm]

sarcasm...

So weak.

If you knew the comments were inappropriate, why did you defend them? Who defends sarcasm?

Show where I once... EVER... stated that there are not white racist people please... thanks.

...and no. The system of the USA is not racist. that is ecofarms ridiculous argument too....

Systemic =/= systematic.

How about you stop bringing my name up, and misrepresenting my positions, in your arguments. Your obsession with me is pathetic.

 

[ecofarm]

So your post was a lie... cool. Got it. It was obvious but I wanted to see you admit it.

That's just sad and pathetic.

Laughing with me are far more than the handful laughing at me... which means they are laughing at your posts, the majority.

:screwy

Voices in your head? Have some self respect.

 

[RamFel]

As i told you, you are completely uneducated on transsexuality and it's causes. You are anti-science and are EXACTLY like homophobes of yesteryear. No difference.

In brief, one's "sex" occurs in two places in the body: one's genitals and one's brain. There is a part of one's brain that is "wired" to understand what one's sex is. This part of the brain develops during the 2nd trimester in the womb and is caused by either a testosterone hormonal surge in males and a lack thereof in females. On some rare occasions, a disconnect happens: the testosterone surge occurs in an anatomical female and does not occur in an anatomical male. In these cases, the individual is biologically and structurally "wired" to be the sex opposite of their genitalia. This causes one to be transsexual, the biological inconsistency of which I referred. This often creates Gender Dysphoric Disorder, extreme feelings of discomfort surrounding that inconsistency. All efforts to alter the brain to match the body have completely failed to alleviate symptoms of GDD. On the other side of that, matching the body to the brain (transitioning) eliminates the symptoms of GDD in at least 95% of all cases, bringing the body and brain into alignment.

So, in other words, your "opinion" is based on your feelings and bias and has nothing to do with logic or information. If you want more information, feel free to ask. I can provide quite a bit more.

that is the strangest load of Cr** I have ever hear or seen. Have you ever seen the part of the brain that is "wired"? How would you know what you were looking at? I can safely say that I have not, but I am not here bragging about it. What about a woman giving birth where you have seeb the baby's brains where you have seen it develop during the second trimester. Or even the rewiring of the structurally "wired" to be the sex opposite of their genitalia?

You have not seen anything of the kind of anything that was described here.

 

[AGENT J]

lets see the evidence you have. I'll bet you don't have anything as good as what I have.

LMAO wrong again and another dodge!
You have ZERO, we are all waiting for you to provide ANY. Why don't you simply show integrity and honesty and admit the fact you have NO factual evidence to support your claim. YOU made a claim, you back it up with facts that make it true or keep dodging and continue to have each of your posts fail

 

[RamFel]

LMAO wrong again and another dodge!
You have ZERO, we are all waiting for you to provide ANY. Why don't you simply show integrity and honesty and admit the fact you have NO factual evidence to support your claim. YOU made a claim, you back it up with facts that make it true or keep dodging and continue to have each of your posts fail

As I thought. You have nothing. Do you? Well at least came out and started talking your nonsense. Thanks for the opportunity to kill your argument. It was, however, too easy.

Things would go better for you if you stayed out in the open for us, OK?

 

[Bodi]

Questioning the origin of a person's name with your perceived intention is xenophobic.

:lol: No, it isn't because I was making a joke based off what DittoHead said. The fact that it flies waaaay over your head is not my fault.

Despite my copious quotes, you have continuously refused to state your intention in your own words.

Again, not my fault that even though I flat out told you my intention was sarcasm (because who cares where a person is born or lives with regards to what their name is) and the fact that I told you that you misunderstood and took me seriously so I ran with that messing with you a teeny bit... you know what... feel free to think whatever you like.

 

[AGENT J]

As I thought. You have nothing. Do you? Well at least came out and started talking your nonsense. Thanks for the opportunity to kill your argument. It was, however, too easy.

Things would go better for you if you stayed out in the open for us, OK?

LMAO another dodge and your post completely fails again. Thats what I thought! I love destroying your claims.
So far nothing as changed, YOU made a claim and YOU cant provide ONE single fact to support it and make it true and we keep pointing that hilarious fact out watching each post of yours completely fail.
When you have one single fact that supports your claim and makes it true please present it, thanks!

opcorn2:

 

[Bodi]

So weak.

If you knew the comments were inappropriate, why did you defend them? Who defends sarcasm?

The comment was not inappropriate in context... try again.

How about you stop bringing my name up, and misrepresenting my positions, in your arguments. Your obsession with me is pathetic.

It relates perfectly to the topic being discussed... I am teaching others to be more accepting and open. You are a perfect example. :shrug:

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

:lol: No, it isn't because I was making a joke based off what DittoHead said. The fact that it flies waaaay over your head is not my fault.



Again, not my fault that even though I flat out told you my intention was sarcasm (because who cares where a person is born or lives with regards to what their name is) and the fact that I told you that you misunderstood and took me seriously so I ran with that messing with you a teeny bit... you know what... feel free to think whatever you like.

It's probably against the rules for me to say this, but you're a liar. A liar who got caught and then lied about lying.

You should have more respect for yourself.

 

[Bodi]

That's just sad and pathetic.

Yes. His lies were pathetic.

:screwy

Voices in your head? Have some self respect.

The voices and the PM's from posters... both agree. Laughing with me...

 

[Dittohead not!]

Again where is the proof? Something scientific please.

OK:

Scientists at the Karolinska Institute studied brain scans of 90 gay and straight men and women, and found that the size of the two symmetrical halves of the brains of gay men more closely resembled those of straight women than they did straight men.

source

You don't choose your brain.

 

[Bodi]

It's probably against the rules for me to say this, but you're a liar.

It is against the rules but not that big a deal. I don't report people so the mods will probably not see it...

A liar who got caught and then lied about lying.

Not at all... You are on my radar as an easy target now.

You should have more respect for yourself.

If I was the racist you think that I am that comment would be meaningless...

 

[RamFel]

OK:



source

You don't choose your brain.

Well, it depends. It really all depends on which comes first. The brain or the gay activities. In other words, did the gay activities affect the brain, causing the change, or did the brain cause behavior changes. I believe the behavior affected the brain over time.

 

[AGENT J]

Well, it depends. It really all depends on which comes first. The brain or the gay activities. In other words, did the gay activities affect the brain, causing the change, or did the brain cause behavior changes. I believe the behavior affected the brain over time.

LMAO thats the most retarded thing I have ever read about the sexual orientation. This is gonna be so good and so funny . . .

What "behavior"?
What "Gay activities"?

opcorn2:

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Well, it depends. It really all depends on which comes first. The brain or the gay activities. In other words, did the gay activities affect the brain, causing the change, or did the brain cause behavior changes. I believe the behavior affected the brain over time.

On what do you base that belief?

 

[ecofarm]

On what do you base that belief?

My guess would be the need to believe someone, not God, made him gay.