• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Coons and Flake: Kavanaugh nomination 'over' if proven he lied to committee

The investigation is into the allegation made by Dr. Ford. Is that not what Dr. Ford and the Democrats want?

Looks like you want a full in fishing trip.

Kavanaugh's high school drinking bears directly on Dr Ford's allegations. It's that simple. Not a fishing expedition at all. Her allegation is that she was sexually assaulted by a "drunken" Bret Kavanaugh and a "drunken" Mark Judge. You can dance around that all you want...but thats all your doing...dancing.
 
Ask around. Perhaps in your neck of the woods people see both the same.

Reality is reality and what people see if often what they want to see. Psychiatry is a medical science and Psychiatric treatment is medical treatment.

I already know ignorance abounds in this country. I don't have to go farther than this forum to see that.
 
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/senators-coons-flake-say-kavanaugh-done-proof-shows-lied-committee/



I think anyone who doesn't see the world through the eyes of what is good for Republicans can see that Kavanaugh was recklessly dishonest to the committee. If the FBI investigation shows dishonesty on Kavanaugh's part, not even up to the goal of lying about sexual assault, but, lying about any matter. Then these Senators will be forced to vote 'No' on Kavanaugh. And in doing so they will have prevented a conflicted liar with extreme biases from getting on the court.

And who out there can disagree? Should lying to the Senate Judiciary Committee become the new normal? Is lying to get your way, the American way now?

Unfortunately, lying and deception is how they do business in Washington DC. Whistleblowers are prosecuted, mendacious appointed and elected officials are celebrated.
 
Here is what I see...

OP:Kavanaugh

Poster X: Trump, Trump

Poster Y: Trump Trump Trumpity Trump

Poster Z: Trumpenstein

I don't normally use the phrase TDS but if there ever was an example this is it.
Kavanaugh and Trump are connected, obviously. What makes you think they are mutually exclusive?

TDS: Trump Denial Syndrome.
 
Kavanaugh's high school drinking bears directly on Dr Ford's allegations. It's that simple. Not a fishing expedition at all. Her allegation is that she was sexually assaulted by a "drunken" Bret Kavanaugh and a "drunken" Mark Judge. You can dance around that all you want...but thats all your doing...dancing.

Don't care if he drank in the past. Don't care if he drinks now. Don't care if he drinks in the future.

The question is did he do what was claimed by Dr. Ford....

Did he? Didn't he?

Yes? No?
 
Reality is reality and what people see if often what they want to see. Psychiatry is a medical science and Psychiatric treatment is medical treatment.

I already know ignorance abounds in this country. I don't have to go farther than this forum to see that.

I never argued it was not a medical science.

And yes, plenty of ignorance is displayed on this board. By both sides of the aisle.
 
Don't care if he drank in the past. Don't care if he drinks now. Don't care if he drinks in the future.

The question is did he do what was claimed by Dr. Ford....

Did he? Didn't he?

Yes? No?

Depends on how much he drinks, which does impact many areas of ones ability to perform their job.

Agree let's get to the bottom of the matter, I would suggest a polygraph for all three people that were supposed to be present, conducted by the FBI, see who is being deceptive.
 
I never argued it was not a medical science.

And yes, plenty of ignorance is displayed on this board. By both sides of the aisle.

Your arguing that its not a medical treatment because some number of nitwits opine that its not. If its a medical science, its clinical application, "treatment" is a medical treatment. Understanding this stuff ain't rocket science although it often resembles dentistry since it can be like pulling teeth!
 
Your arguing that its not a medical treatment because some number of nitwits opine that its not. If its a medical science, its clinical application, "treatment" is a medical treatment. Understanding this stuff ain't rocket science although it often resembles dentistry since it can be like pulling teeth!

Where did I state it was not a medical procedure?

Post number?
 
You know you're dealing with a weak argument when device memes are relied upon
Nah, actually I know I'm dealing with Trump obsessed/deranged people when a thread on Kavanaugh suddenly turns into a Trumpophobe circle jerk at the first mention of his name in a thread. Talk about dog-whistle reactions.
 
John Wayne Gacy was a Democrat precinct captain. Just sayin.

Yeah, back in 1960 when conservatives used to call themselves democrats. But today he would've been a proud republican.
 
Or not, because I'm afraid Trump and his acolytes will do all they can to limit the scope of the FBI investigation and to deny them the resources to do it properly. They just want an excuse to say "see, we did allow the FBI to investigate, nothing was found, the judge is confirmed."

Or they will, and they will say that we have this and let's see if the president has the temerity to disallow it
 
What hat do you IMAGINE they will find about Dr. Ford 's allegation?

I imagine they will find items that will suggest she is telling the truth.

Truth has a way of doing that.
 
I think most people divide Physical treatment and Psychiatric treatment. I know if someone states they have recieved medical treatment I assume physical.

Seems jnug might be close to this field to defend it so..

I see the distinction between the two as wholly opposite. In medicine, two doctors looking at the same data would typically recommend the same treatment, whereas, two psychiatrists looking at the same data typically recommend different treatments. Likewise, in court, frequently, if not always, witnesses with equal educations and backgrounds will diametrically oppose each others opinions on any given matter, even though they both have the exact same data.

Let's call it science-light.. ;)

Tim-
 
Nah, actually I know I'm dealing with Trump obsessed/deranged people when a thread on Kavanaugh suddenly turns into a Trumpophobe circle jerk at the first mention of his name in a thread. Talk about dog-whistle reactions.

Well dogwhistle this to your kneejerk leftophobe Trump Delusional Syndromed buds:

From one of my other comments re; Kavanaugh:

This judge is the only judge on record expressing extreme views that would literally expand the powers of the president which would have the absolute effect of elevating him to be above the law.

That fact, alone, EVERYONE who claims to be a patriot should oppose his appointment. Appointing Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court would be one more incremental step in the slow march towards fascism.

Fabian Fascism.

Therefore, in my view, Kavanaugh must be stopped by any and all justifiable means, fair, or unfair, and that is the patriotic thing do in the face of fabian fascism.

"Extremism in the face of liberty is no vice" --Barry Goldwater

What doesn't make sense to me at all, given the libertarian leanings of today's right, how they can possibly favor Kavanaugh given his current views on presidential power. It makes no sense.

BULLSEYE
 
Yeah, back in 1960 when conservatives used to call themselves democrats. But today he would've been a proud republican.

I so admire your ability to state things as fact, when you have no ****ing idea.
 
I so admire your ability to state things as fact, when you have no ****ing idea.
Your willful ignorance is nothing to admire or aspire to...so forgive me if I know what I'm talking about and you don't.
 
Well dogwhistle this to your kneejerk leftophobe Trump Delusional Syndromed buds:

From one of my other comments re; Kavanaugh:



BULLSEYE
Great point - sharp as a basketball.
 
Trump today on the lawn of the WH:
"I really believe he was very strong on the fact that he drank a lot."

Hysterical. Trump really needs to shut up if he wants to help Kavanaugh. Clearly Trump "heard" through Kavanaugh's Senate Hearing nonsense and for once actually said something close to factual. Nice job Donald. McGahn probably has his head in his hands, at a bar trying to drink the day away....AGAIN!
 
Seems jnug might be close to this field to defend it so..

I see the distinction between the two as wholly opposite. In medicine, two doctors looking at the same data would typically recommend the same treatment, whereas, two psychiatrists looking at the same data typically recommend different treatments. Likewise, in court, frequently, if not always, witnesses with equal educations and backgrounds will diametrically oppose each others opinions on any given matter, even though they both have the exact same data.

Let's call it science-light.. ;)

Tim-

Psychiatrists are medical doctors. You are probably mixing up psychiatrists with psychologists (the latter are not medical doctors). Psychiatrists employ physical treatments: medications (by the mouth, or IV, or IM, or transdermal), ECT, deep brain stimulation, light therapy (for seasonal affective disorder, for example), etc. And no, psychiatry is not science-light, but rather, part of the very advanced and very scientific field of neurosciences, and it deals with neurotransmitters (dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, etc.), and brain chemistry.

By the way, two medical doctors looking at a variety of non-psychiatric organic diseases won't necessarily recommend the same treatment like you said. There are endless variations, equally acceptable. Otherwise we wouldn't need doctors; just, some sort of computer programed with symptoms would cough up the prescription.

Medicine is a LOT more complicated than your post assumes, which is why doctors need such long education to be able to work (at least 8 years of post-college education, in med school and residency training). And psychiatry, as a medical specialty, is part of the medical field.
 
Back
Top Bottom