• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

City bans calling someone an ‘illegal alien’ out of hate

We have laws for illegal aliens that would do just fine if enforced.

That is true of almost any law, but is it being realistic to expect an ICE/ERO force about the size of the combined police forces of Boston, MA and Baltimore, MD to patrol the entire US interior?
 
I'm sorry, are you incapable of inferring anything except what is written in black and white? You clearly claim to hate hate speech. This is a good first step for you! But now comes the tougher test: Can you put those alleged beliefs into practice? For example, when people who don't talk like you or look like you commit the misdemeanor of entering the country without proper documentation? Is your outrage in proportion to the crime or the ones who commit the crime? Think carefully before you answer this question.

Support or retract.
 
What do you think should happen to employers who are alleged to have hired illegal immigrants?

They should be prosecuted but few are due to lack of enforcement. We should have a federal eVerify mandate enforced by the IRS - by disallowing the deduction of direct labor costs by employers for any employee (W-2 or 1099) not having a current (annual) eVerify certification.
 
Yes, that's what conservatives say, but they don't walk the walk. When it came out that multiple trump businesses used undocumented workers, even where it was shown that they were forging documents for those workers, conservatives were completely silent. But then, to be fair, they're always silent about the employers every time undocumented workers are rounded up.

But if you ask conservatives on an anonymous debate site if they believe that employers should face penalties for hiring undocumented workers, they'll always say "yes."

Do you have any clue what conservative business owners do in regards to hiring illegal workers?
 
So if i say "Happy Holidays, illegal alien " i could piss off both sides at the same time?

Something tells me the amount of **** that would be tossed your way could never be avoided, even if you were the Flash.
 
You're not upset because this law violates the First Amendment. You're upset because it would remove a tiny fraction of Americans' power to hate. :)

You don't even know what the word "hate" means.
 
Pure idiocy.


I’d like to know what these clowns define as “hate”.

The word burners are hard at work.

Can we have a Sieg Heil!!!

Considering the level of invective one usually hears on the streets of NYC, especially during arguments over parking spaces, and the city government's policy to avoid arrests and prosecution of minor crimes, who will really take notice let alone enforce another empty law?

Will I get arrested for cursing drivers from New Jersey?

When I'm pounding the windshield of a cab, that just cut me off, with a baseball bat and scream at the driver "where did you learn how to drive, Nigeria?" and he says "yes" am I supposed to just stop and walk away?

Nothing like a City Council with too much time on its hands. And they still can't figure out how to provide public toilets that won't become homeless shelters.
 
Do what?

Do you have numbers?

Anything?

Are all employers of illegals conservative?

Or are you broad brushing again?

Are there no liberal terms employers?

Or are you suggesting liberals would not employ illegals?


You take the position that employers should be penalized for hiring undocumented workers, but you can't even bring yourself to say "It was bad that Trump's businesses regularly employed undocumented workers." If it's true, as you say, that you frown on the practice, you would have said something to that effect. But you haven't and I don't think you will.

But I've never seen a single conservative condemn any business that hires undocumented workers. Not one.
 
You take the position that employers should be penalized for hiring undocumented workers, but you can't even bring yourself to say "It was bad that Trump's businesses regularly employed undocumented workers." If it's true, as you say, that you frown on the practice, you would have said something to that effect. But you haven't and I don't think you will.

But I've never seen a single conservative condemn any business that hires undocumented workers. Not one.

TRUMP CARD noted.

ALL EMPLOYERS should be hammered.

Is Trump somehow in your mind a separate sub set from ALL?

As to the rest of employers... I notice you don't back up your conservative claim.
 
TRUMP CARD noted.

ALL EMPLOYERS should be hammered.

Is Trump somehow in your mind a separate sub set from ALL?

As to the rest of employers... I notice you don't back up your conservative claim.

Alright, so if you believe that hiring undocumented workers is bad, then prove it: say, "It's bad that trump's businesses hired undocumented workers."

Notice how I'm not even asking you to say they should be penalized. I've dropped the far as low as it will go. Just say that it was bad.

That's it. Not "awful," not "the worst thing in the world," just "bad."
 
Alright, so if you believe that hiring undocumented workers is bad, then prove it: say, "It's bad that trump's businesses hired undocumented workers."

Notice how I'm not even asking you to say they should be penalized. I've dropped the far as low as it will go. Just say that it was bad.

That's it. Not "awful," not "the worst thing in the world," just "bad."

Since you cannot seem to comprehend "all" I guess I will have to say it's bad that Trump's businesses hired undocumented workers.

Now, the rest of conservatives you maligned. Anything to back up your statements?
 
Since you cannot seem to comprehend "all" I guess I will have to say it's bad that Trump's businesses hired undocumented workers.

Now, the rest of conservatives you maligned. Anything to back up your statements?

To back up what statements?
 
Seems that question is complicated.
"It should be understood that a landlord is not prohibited necessarily from following a general policy against renting to illegal immigrants. However, the landlord should be very careful in the creation and application of that policy so as to avoid discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin in violation of The Fair Housing Act. Remember that every rental applicant is unique, and every landlord’s circumstances are different. To further assure proper compliance with the law, you should consult your own attorney regarding your particular circumstances."
RENTING TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS: WHAT LEGAL CONCERNS SHOULD A LANDLORD HAVE? – AZREIA

https://www.equalhousing.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/2012-Immigration-Status-FAQ.pdf

When somebody rents an apartment or house, there is a process. They have to prove who they are, sign a lease and have good credit.

How does an illegal alien comply with any of that?
 
You still have not answered my question.

Again.

Oh, and you inferred I was a hate speech defender.

Support or retract.

I have decided Phys251 is not worth the time. The same claim has been said about me. His refusal to answer questions is very telling. I have even made a statement regarding hate speech. His little ploy to try and trap a responder with the "unconditional" statement is easy to see through.

I agree that Phys251 needs to prove his statement or retract.
 
I have decided Phys251 is not worth the time. The same claim has been said about me. His refusal to answer questions is very telling. I have even made a statement regarding hate speech. His little ploy to try and trap a responder with the "unconditional" statement is easy to see through.

I agree that Phys251 needs to prove his statement or retract.

He appears to be in "Runaway" mode.
 
When somebody rents an apartment or house, there is a process. They have to prove who they are, sign a lease and have good credit.

How does an illegal alien comply with any of that?

You would have to ask an illegal alien. You could inquire to some of the sanctuary cities and ask.
 
You have to understand, supporters of fascism do not rally behind free speech for the sake of free speech. They do so as a smokescreen for their entitled attitude. They feel entitled to hate speech without any consequences.

You seem to condone this law. Why is that?
 
Dems have lost their minds....can’t wait for election night next Nov....

All this crap will help sink Pocahontas because she will defend it

This is just a sample of what their going to when they hold all three houses, again.
 
Back
Top Bottom