Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump WH Identified as “Charlie” in Strzok and Page Text

[RaleBulgarian]

You didn't answer my question.
I asked you if your mainstream media/"more reliable sources" present you with Grassley's letter to the DOJ. In other words, did you even know that letter existed before reading this thread? I doubt it.

You’re right, I didn’t know of the letter, but the letter itself isn’t the issue. Knowing reliable sources is, and I just showed you one. You’re welcome.

 

[Mycroft]

You’re right, I didn’t know of the letter, but the letter itself isn’t the issue. Knowing reliable sources is, and I just showed you one. You’re welcome.

The letter is the topic of this thread.

Oh...wait...you don't want to talk about the topic of this thread, do you? You want to talk about the messenger.

Never mind.

You are dismissed.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Having a poster on here with the name of Trump who posts the stuff he does just makes this whole corrupt era even more perfect.

 

[Trump]

Re: Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump WH Identified as “Charlie� in Strzok and Page Tex

It would be funny if it wasn’t so desperate and sad.

try harder

 

[US&THEM]

Re: Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump WH Identified as “Charlie” in Strzok and Page Tex

try harder

It is funny how the Trump DOJ attorneys are fighting to not allow the Mueller redacted and grand jury information to be released.

Then you have the FBI release all of the interview notes for Flynn.

Which Deep State are you more angry at now?

 

[Trump]

Re: Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump WH Identified as “Charlie” in Strzok and Page Tex

It is funny how the Trump DOJ attorneys are fighting to not allow the Mueller redacted and grand jury information to be released.

Then you have the FBI release all of the interview notes for Flynn.

Which Deep State are you more angry at now?

you do realize the difference between Grand Jury material and 302's?

 

[US&THEM]

Re: Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump WH Identified as “Charlie” in Strzok and Page Tex

you do realize the difference between Grand Jury material and 302's?

All official FBI reports are done on a 302. Grand jury materials are testimony and evidence presented to the grand jury. Now explain to us why Trump is fighting to have not allow the Congress to see the grand jury material? If the Russia investigation was a “Witch Hunt” why wouldn’t the President want everyone to see the lies?

 

[snakestretcher]

Is Char-a-MEL-ah same ‘Charlie’ in the Strzok and Page communications? I say yes

deep state is sloppy and getting closer to being exposed in UkraineGate lies

[sic] is used incorrectly. It means 'thus'; referring to a word which might be misinterpreted, spelt wrongly or used mistakenly in the original. It is not used to indicate a missing word. I smell a rat here because the author is clearly unacquainted with English grammar usage (typical for uneducated conservatives). Oh, and Gateway Pundit:lamo

https://data.grammarbook.com/blog/definitions/sic/

 

[RaleBulgarian]

The letter is the topic of this thread.

Oh...wait...you don't want to talk about the topic of this thread, do you? You want to talk about the messenger.

Never mind.

You are dismissed.

Wrong. The topic of this thread is far right irresponsible wild ass speculation about someone identified as “Charlie” in texts between Strzok and Page, purported as important by a partisan commentator, and posted here for proper derision by informed, critically thinking members, and cheap thrills for Trumpsters.

“Charlie” wasn’t even at the center of Grassley’s letter to Barr. Broader suspected “spying” and purported unapproved releases of classified information was.

As always, gatewaypundit takes a few facts and wraps them up in a big ball of ****.


Back to what you and me were discussing; unreliable information sources. If you choose to waste your time referencing garbage sources like gatewaypundit, The Daily Caller, ZeroHedge, etc., that’s cool. Enjoy your fantasy world.

 

[US&THEM]

Dan Bongino is so desperate to matter. The guy is a fraud and has tried to get elected to Congress 3 times and the funniest part he has run in 3 different districts. He has made his home with the Trump base.

The Gateway Pundit is using Dan Bongino as it’s source is a double whammy of stupid.

 

[nota bene]

Dan Bongino is so desperate to matter. The guy is a fraud and has tried to get elected to Congress 3 times and the funniest part he has run in 3 different districts. He has made his home with the Trump base.

The Gateway Pundit is using Dan Bongino as it’s source is a double whammy of stupid.

What makes Bongino a fraud?

 

[Airyaman]

The letter is the topic of this thread.

Oh...wait...you don't want to talk about the topic of this thread, do you? You want to talk about the messenger.

Never mind.

You are dismissed.

The letter is not the topic of this thread...a conspiracy theory dreamed up by Dan BingoBongo is the topic of this thread.

 

[Trump]

The letter is not the topic of this thread...a conspiracy theory dreamed up by Dan BingoBongo is the topic of this thread.

Do you have a different take on Grassley letter or whom this "Charlie" Strzok and Paige were referencing?

 

[Trump]

Re: Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump WH Identified as “Charlie” in Strzok and Page Tex

Any message that comes from the Gateway Pundit is garbage. They've cried wolf a few too many times to take anything they say seriously, much like some DP posters I know.

Adam Schiff would fall into that category.

 

[JasperL]

Re: Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump WH Identified as “Charlie” in Strzok and Page Tex

Hell, you don't need Fox or any other news site to tell you that Grassley wrote a letter to the DOJ...before you'll believe that he actually wrote a letter. You don't need those news sites to tell you about it before you will "give it a look".

And why on earth would you limit your source of facts to mainstream media? Do you realize how much important information they actually keep from you?

I wonder...if I gave you this link... https://saraacarter.com/wp-content/...DOJ-Surveillance-of-Trump-Transition-Team.pdf ...would you ignore the contents of that pdf because it didn't come from your preferred site?

But hey...as I said...no problem. Keep your head in the sand.

The Gateway Pundit link is to a bunch of theories involving the alleged whistleblower. The Grassley letter sheds no light on that at all. It doesn't name the alleged WB or speculate about who he is. It asks some questions. Reading the Grassley letter sheds no light on anything. It's a springboard for CT bull****, which is why no one not an idiot trusts Gateway Pundit. As you point out, the letter is available at 100 sites.

 

[JasperL]

Re: Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump WH Identified as “Charlie� in Strzok and Page Tex

If you’re searching for truth/facts in gatewaypundit, you’re wasting time digging through mostly garbage to glean a very meager return for your efforts.

A smart person will bypass known lousy sources for more reliable ones that can be cross checked against other known reliable sources and still be done quicker and with more reliable results.

But hey, if like the National Enquirer level journalism of gatewaypundit, that’s fine. :thumbs:

That's actually unfair to the National Enquirer....

 

[beefheart]

Is Char-a-MEL-ah same ‘Charlie’ in the Strzok and Page communications? I say yes



deep state is sloppy and getting closer to being exposed in UkraineGate lies

 

[cabse5]

Yep. The Dems just can't help themselves but it's what happens when you try to manufacture something out of whole cloth and then try to keep its real origins secret from the voters.

... To create invalid polls of wanting Trump impeached for this Ukrainian phone call.

 

[cabse5]

Dan Bongino is so desperate to matter. The guy is a fraud and has tried to get elected to Congress 3 times and the funniest part he has run in 3 different districts. He has made his home with the Trump base.

The Gateway Pundit is using Dan Bongino as it’s source is a double whammy of stupid.

How can you tell us to shoot alleged fraudulent messengers like Gateway Pundit, for example, when you cling to alleged fraudulent messengers like PolitiFact, for example, which back your beliefs?

 

[beefheart]

Dan Bongino is so desperate to matter. The guy is a fraud and has tried to get elected to Congress 3 times and the funniest part he has run in 3 different districts. He has made his home with the Trump base.

The Gateway Pundit is using Dan Bongino as it’s source is a double whammy of stupid.

I can always tell how gullible and ignorant someone is when they share articles from Dim Jim and the Gateway Pundit and purport that it is true...while ignoring the fact that GP has done nothing but lie for years.

Rubes eat up this crap, they don't have the intellect to realize how idiotic it is.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

... To create invalid polls of wanting Trump impeached for this Ukrainian phone call.

Calling a poll “invalid” doesn’t make it so. Like saying Trump “is a good president”, both are obviously lies that are very easily disproven.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

How can you tell us to shoot alleged fraudulent messengers like Gateway Pundit, for example, when you cling to alleged fraudulent messengers like PolitiFact, for example, which back your beliefs?

Suggesting that gatewaypundit even comes within entire continents of PolitiFact when it comes to truthfulness and accuracy proves your complete dishonesty and/or utter ignorance of reliable sources.

 

[Nickyjo]

Re: Ciaramella May Be CIA Spy Planted in Trump WH Identified as “Charlie” in Strzok and Page Tex

try attacking the message .....not the messenger.

Good point. Take your cue from Trump.

 

[Airyaman]

Do you have a different take on Grassley letter or whom this "Charlie" Strzok and Paige were referencing?

No, I don't do conspiracies theories.

 

[cabse5]

Calling a poll “invalid” doesn’t make it so. Like saying Trump “is a good president”, both are obviously lies that are very easily disproven.

A poll is invalid if polling questions revolve around political biases.