Chris Wallace: Taylor testimony 'very damaging to President Trump'

[eman623]

Yeah you had to have a minimum of a double digit IQ to keep up with it so I don't blame you for not being able to follow...

Thanks for the unprovoked personal attack. Did it make you feel any better?

 

[marke]

It's not his job to cite impeachable offenses. He's not a constitutional lawyer.

Sad that twump, the man you worship over Jesus, is in such dire straits.

It is apparently nobody's job to cite impeachable offences, including Comrade Party Charimann Schittf's.

 

[marke]

Guliani works for the President? Well, he appears to when he’s on Fox.

But Igor and Lev paid him.

Which seems odd. They too claimed the he was their lawyer. Generally clients pay the lawyer, not the other way around.

And since the money used ot pay the President’s “lawyer” came form Dimitri Firtash and his Kremlin friends.........

You seen to know a lot about how money is changing hands in Ukraine. Let me ask you something that the gentle lady ambassador seemed not to know anything about - Where did the billions of dollars in US aid go when it passed through the hands of American operatives there? We know Paul Manafort was there. So was Tony Podesta. So was Hunter Biden and Devlin Archer and a number of others.

 

[marke]

Trump Russia collusion is real, and it’s largely in plain sight. Mueller did not conclude that there was no collusion, as you falsely claim. Indeed, the Mueller report contains 200 pages of Russia collusion, which you keep trying to ignore.

The Roger Stone trial fleshed a lot of it out, too. It also made it very clear that Stone was running the entire operation, and that he was in frequent and regular contact with Julian Asante, who got the material from the Russians.

And, of course the Russian connection in Trump’s new campaign to try and smear Joe Biden is obvious as well.

Stone got his hands on emails after Wikileaks released them to the public, not before. But so did everyone else. Stone may have been one of the first to pour over them for facts, but he never obtained anything exclusively.

Ukraine prosecuted two Ukrainians who were found guilty of working with the DNC to corrupt the 2016 election in Hillary's favor. Mueller either overlooked that corruption or simply did not come across it. Nevertheless, American investigators have known about that corruption for months, which is one reason Trump mentioned that he wanted more information about it from the Ukrainians who had uncovered it.

 

[marke]

And there is another blatant lie.

Mueller proved there was without a doubt Russian influence and not only was trump aware of it he was complicit to the point of sharing I eternal poll data that was used by the Russians to target the states that Put trump over tbe edge I EC votes.

120 documented meetings between his Campaign a d Russian operatives.

But keep lying about how Mueller found nothing and exonerated trump, even though Mueller made it very, very clear the he was not exonerated.

You better say some hail Mary's or whatever it is that gets you off the hook for committing a mortal sin...

Sir Arthur Muellerhead returns to the democrat impeachment castle on Corruption hill overlooking the DC Camelot swamp. On the end of his bloody spear he carries a life-sized picture of the head of the dragon he went out to slay. Thousands of swirling-eyes fans turn out to greet the fabled hero as he returns the conquering knight.

"I have captured a picture of the beast and have its flattened features on the end of my spear for all to admire. As you can see, the image of the colluding beast has been slain. We can all rest happy now knowing we have accomplished our goal of ridding our land of its texting terror. May we all pause for a much worthy time of worship for our success!"

 

[marke]

Your really do just repeat the last thing the guy on your AM radio shouts at you, don’t you?????

“Innuendo”?

There’s no innuendo.

All the witnesses on Wednesday stipulated to specific actions. Which is not innuendo.

This is a hearing, so there is no requirement or expectation of due process.

“The guy in charge serving as judge, jury, and executioner”.

Pure talk radio drivel.

The Chairman is not a judge, and is not rendering judgement. That’s a committee function.

This is not a trial. The committee functions as a grand jury. The witnesses before a grand jury are not in legal jeopardy and are typically not allowed council.

And they can’t hide from the subpoenas either. The only defense for a witness before a Grand Jury is the Fifth Amendment, which the witness cannot assert on behalf of any other party.

And just to underline how mindless your repetition of talking points really is; you make this obviously false claim.

“No cross examination of witnesses”. Really? What were Meadows and Collins doing?

Your claim about “facts and evidence” is even more obviously false. There are plenty of facts and evidence.

As for “heresay” witnesses. First, as I noted before, that’s false.

And even if it were true, the first hand witnesses are the ones your fool’s gold fuhrer is trying to hide.

Someone needs to inform the dummass comrade Committee Chairmann Schittf that even though he has the dirty power to suspend due process, he does not have the power to miraculously turn rumor and innuendo into facts and evidence.

I still have a hard time believing Schittf and pals can be so stupid and prove to the whole world what buffoons they are by continuing this democrat impeachment circus the way they are.

 

[marke]

You really are ignorant as a rock aren’t you. If anything the Mueller report proved there was a russian attack that our president did nothing about. Then there’s ten counts that apply to him if he can’t win re-election - that’s jail time.

All that and he did it again. Not going to be pretty but you will lose badly in the end. Here’s a cartoon, dumbed down just enough for a trump supporter to understand.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It seems there are many crimes that have not yet been addressed, but which will likely finally become national news once Durham finishes his criminal investigation.

 

[marke]

Feel free to link whatever you are rambling on about. I guess Biden’s influence must be awesome if he is still on board?

Correction. The gentle woman ambassador said he just recently left Burisma. He probably should have left when Tony Podesta folded shop and left just after the democrat mob there threw Manafort under the bus.

 

[US&THEM]

Correction. The gentle woman ambassador said he just recently left Burisma. He probably should have left when Tony Podesta folded shop and left just after the democrat mob there threw Manafort under the bus.

You think Manafort was the victim?

Still waiting for the links to explain your Joe Biden claims.

 

[Tanngrisnir]

It is apparently nobody's job to cite impeachable offences, including Comrade Party Charimann Schittf's.

Already been done, countless times. That you can't face that emotionally is irrelevant.