• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Chris Wallace: Taylor testimony 'very damaging to President Trump'

Oh, I just bet you do ... but there's also something many quick to judge the president's dismissal of Democrats' demands have forgotten about the process before the impeachment basement star chamber "investigation" became an official impeachment inquiry by congressional vote.
Let me repeat, it was not an "official impeachment inquiry" until the vote was taken. The president by WH counsel advised Trump and others close to the president to ignore the investigators demands, including subpoenas.

Dumb and wrong. No vote is required to open an impeachment inquiry. A vote IS required to open impeachment, not necessarily subsequent to an impeachment inquiry.
 
Dumb and wrong. No vote is required to open an impeachment inquiry. A vote IS required to open impeachment, not necessarily subsequent to an impeachment inquiry.

Learn to read.
Where did I claim that a vote was needed to open an impeachment inquiry?

Oh that's right, I didn't.
I wouldn't be preaching about "dumb" if I were you.
 
Chris Wallace should have waited, Jim Jordan had Taylor for lunch.

Gym Jordon is a big mouth ass. He had no one for lunch. He was only speaking to Trump, an audience of one.
 
Your boy cheats on his multiple wives, doesn't pay his bills, sleeps with and pays off a porn actress (while married) and is a crook. You shouldn't be talking about honor nor integrity.

And those were his finer points!
 
Learn to read.
Where did I claim that a vote was needed to open an impeachment inquiry?

Oh that's right, I didn't.
I wouldn't be preaching about "dumb" if I were you.


You just did!!!!!!!
 
Facts matter, Rudy G and Sondland have embarrassed themselves at Trump’s behest, they’ll be lucky not be indicted.

Two guys will be indicted for doing their legitimate jobs? What has this world come to?
 
Two guys will be indicted for doing their legitimate jobs? What has this world come to?

Your job doesn’t matter when one lies, lies and omits while under investigation. I will play along what was Rudy’s job responsibilities? As for Amb Sondland why would the Ambassador of the EU be involved in the Ukraine?
 
I agree Hunter Biden is a jackass who should have not taken or even been offered the board seat.

But again, Burisma was under investigation before Hunter Biden was on the board and there is zero accusations surrounding Joe Biden with it.

Were you outraged when Ivanka received her patents from China after visiting and sitting with Chinese leadership?

Hunter Biden is still on the Burisma board and the missing $1.8 billion in aid from the US that went into Ihor Kolomoisky's personal bank has not yet been found. Before Hunter Biden joined the Burisma board Kolomoisky had been banned from entry into the US but after Hunter became a board member the US ban on Kolomoisky was lifted. Remember, the $1.8 billion in US aid that was last seen entering Kolomoisky's bank has still never been found.
 
Jim Jordan has been given proof of Trump wrongdoing on many occasions and every single time he has come up with outlandish and implausible excuses. Show me where Schiff has accused Trump of anything outlandish and implausible.

Brainwashing is what Jordan is trying to do given that trying to get people to believe implausible reasons for Trump doing something is the definition of "brainwashing". Dealing with a lying con man and accusing him of lying and conning is far from implausible, it is the highest probability possible.

You seem happy in the Schtiffless Garden of Weasels. You go ahead. I'll just stay outside here where the sun is shining and the air is cleaner.
 
Rudy G was not their for foreign policy issues, he became a policy issue when he started utilizing corrupt Ukrainians to personally attack remove a sitting US Ambassador.


Guiliani works for the President. The ambassador serves at the discretion of the President. People should stay out of Trump's business that they have no right to interfere in.
 
Yes Marke, he was worried about the appearance of possible corruption. You will note that he did not actually accuse Hunter of impropriety.
You do understand the nuances of that, yes?

If he was going to say anything he should have done so under Obama, but he didn't. Perhaps he did not want to cross Obama. Who knows?
 
You will never see Trump saying anything directly. He learned that from Roy Cohn "never do or say anything that legally compromises you"

As such, everything is innuendo. The reality is that he did say he wanted a favor in which the already-promised-by-congress funds would be released.

Perhaps referring to what Michael Cohen said about Trump:

I see. Democrats are going to impeach Trump on innuendo they just know must be true because they dreamed it up themselves? Welcome to modern democrat justice. No due process. No presumption of innocence. No defense allowed. No cross examination of witnesses. No acceptance of witnesses who do not share the dogmas and premises of the guy in charge serving as judge, jury and executioner. No dependence on facts and evidence. A sentence of condemnation only needs a collection of hearsay witnesses with strong stubborn feelings about what they think is going on.
 
LOL! Such wonderful wishful thinking. The Dems have Howitzerfulls of more evidence that's utterly damning to twump, including Taylor's testimony. That you have to pretend they don't is simply because the facts aren't on your side.

Alll you've got left is grandstanding, bluster and distraction.

Taylor's testimony when asked by Rep. Ratcliffe to name any specific impeachable offense by Trump that he saw in his involvement with Ukraine: "Uh..... (silence)"
 
You're speaking of The Bible while supporting Donald Trump. The crook and adulterer.

Do you really live in The Bible belt?

Either you don't think Christians should be involved in politics at all or you think nobody should ever vote for a sinner. Which is it?
 
Taylor's testimony when asked by Rep. Ratcliffe to name any specific impeachable offense by Trump that he saw in his involvement with Ukraine: "Uh..... (silence)"

It's not his job to cite impeachable offenses. He's not a constitutional lawyer.

Sad that twump, the man you worship over Jesus, is in such dire straits.
 
Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, two gigantic liars, only lie to sell product. And Southern christians can't figure that out. How stupid do you have to be?

Lots of democrats spent 3 years mocking conservatives for claiming there was no Trump/Russian collusion until Mueller finally came out and admitted there was no Trump/Russian collusion. There are still hundreds of die hard democrats refusing to admit they were wrong, and they continue promoting the debunked lie, no doubt to sage face.
 
Guiliani works for the President. The ambassador serves at the discretion of the President. People should stay out of Trump's business that they have no right to interfere in.

Guliani works for the President? Well, he appears to when he’s on Fox.

But Igor and Lev paid him.

Which seems odd. They too claimed the he was their lawyer. Generally clients pay the lawyer, not the other way around.

And since the money used ot pay the President’s “lawyer” came form Dimitri Firtash and his Kremlin friends.........
 
Lots of democrats spent 3 years mocking conservatives for claiming there was no Trump/Russian collusion until Mueller finally came out and admitted there was no Trump/Russian collusion. There are still hundreds of die hard democrats refusing to admit they were wrong, and they continue promoting the debunked lie, no doubt to sage face.

Trump Russia collusion is real, and it’s largely in plain sight. Mueller did not conclude that there was no collusion, as you falsely claim. Indeed, the Mueller report contains 200 pages of Russia collusion, which you keep trying to ignore.

The Roger Stone trial fleshed a lot of it out, too. It also made it very clear that Stone was running the entire operation, and that he was in frequent and regular contact with Julian Asante, who got the material from the Russians.

And, of course the Russian connection in Trump’s new campaign to try and smear Joe Biden is obvious as well.
 
You seem happy in the Schtiffless Garden of Weasels. You go ahead. I'll just stay outside here where the sun is shining and the air is cleaner.

I have to give you credit for being able to build a fantasy world where the sun shines and the air is cleaner in an environment where garbage (Trump) and corruption (Barr, Giuliani and Pompeo) live. There are very few that can turn something so rotten into a good thing even if it is only in their minds.

Evidently you feel that extortion, immorality, death of innocents, and lawlessness is good and where the leader needs to be told every few minutes how good he is and if it doesn't happen he throws a tantrum where he fires those that did not say he was great.

I wish I could do that but I am not a dreamer, I am a doer and to actually do things you need to face reality.

fantasy1.webp
 
Last edited:
Either you don't think Christians should be involved in politics at all or you think nobody should ever vote for a sinner. Which is it?


Personally I do question their ability to discern reality from fantasy...
 
Lots of democrats spent 3 years mocking conservatives for claiming there was no Trump/Russian collusion until Mueller finally came out and admitted there was no Trump/Russian collusion. There are still hundreds of die hard democrats refusing to admit they were wrong, and they continue promoting the debunked lie, no doubt to sage face.


And there is another blatant lie.

Mueller proved there was without a doubt Russian influence and not only was trump aware of it he was complicit to the point of sharing I eternal poll data that was used by the Russians to target the states that Put trump over tbe edge I EC votes.

120 documented meetings between his Campaign a d Russian operatives.

But keep lying about how Mueller found nothing and exonerated trump, even though Mueller made it very, very clear the he was not exonerated.

You better say some hail Mary's or whatever it is that gets you off the hook for committing a mortal sin...
 
I see. Democrats are going to impeach Trump on innuendo they just know must be true because they dreamed it up themselves? Welcome to modern democrat justice. No due process. No presumption of innocence. No defense allowed. No cross examination of witnesses. No acceptance of witnesses who do not share the dogmas and premises of the guy in charge serving as judge, jury and executioner. No dependence on facts and evidence. A sentence of condemnation only needs a collection of hearsay witnesses with strong stubborn feelings about what they think is going on.


Your really do just repeat the last thing the guy on your AM radio shouts at you, don’t you?????

“Innuendo”?

There’s no innuendo.

All the witnesses on Wednesday stipulated to specific actions. Which is not innuendo.

This is a hearing, so there is no requirement or expectation of due process.

“The guy in charge serving as judge, jury, and executioner”.

Pure talk radio drivel.

The Chairman is not a judge, and is not rendering judgement. That’s a committee function.

This is not a trial. The committee functions as a grand jury. The witnesses before a grand jury are not in legal jeopardy and are typically not allowed council.

And they can’t hide from the subpoenas either. The only defense for a witness before a Grand Jury is the Fifth Amendment, which the witness cannot assert on behalf of any other party.

And just to underline how mindless your repetition of talking points really is; you make this obviously false claim.

“No cross examination of witnesses”. Really? What were Meadows and Collins doing?

Your claim about “facts and evidence” is even more obviously false. There are plenty of facts and evidence.

As for “heresay” witnesses. First, as I noted before, that’s false.

And even if it were true, the first hand witnesses are the ones your fool’s gold fuhrer is trying to hide.
 
Lots of democrats spent 3 years mocking conservatives for claiming there was no Trump/Russian collusion until Mueller finally came out and admitted there was no Trump/Russian collusion. There are still hundreds of die hard democrats refusing to admit they were wrong, and they continue promoting the debunked lie, no doubt to sage face.

You really are ignorant as a rock aren’t you. If anything the Mueller report proved there was a russian attack that our president did nothing about. Then there’s ten counts that apply to him if he can’t win re-election - that’s jail time.

All that and he did it again. Not going to be pretty but you will lose badly in the end. Here’s a cartoon, dumbed down just enough for a trump supporter to understand.

1065a86689904770a61cb7e10a5a45bd.jpg



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Hunter Biden is still on the Burisma board and the missing $1.8 billion in aid from the US that went into Ihor Kolomoisky's personal bank has not yet been found. Before Hunter Biden joined the Burisma board Kolomoisky had been banned from entry into the US but after Hunter became a board member the US ban on Kolomoisky was lifted. Remember, the $1.8 billion in US aid that was last seen entering Kolomoisky's bank has still never been found.

Feel free to link whatever you are rambling on about. I guess Biden’s influence must be awesome if he is still on board?
 
Back
Top Bottom