I see. Democrats are going to impeach Trump on innuendo they just know must be true because they dreamed it up themselves? Welcome to modern democrat justice. No due process. No presumption of innocence. No defense allowed. No cross examination of witnesses. No acceptance of witnesses who do not share the dogmas and premises of the guy in charge serving as judge, jury and executioner. No dependence on facts and evidence. A sentence of condemnation only needs a collection of hearsay witnesses with strong stubborn feelings about what they think is going on.
Your really do just repeat the last thing the guy on your AM radio shouts at you, don’t you?????
“Innuendo”?
There’s no innuendo.
All the witnesses on Wednesday stipulated to specific actions. Which is not innuendo.
This is a hearing, so there is no requirement or expectation of due process.
“The guy in charge serving as judge, jury, and executioner”.
Pure talk radio drivel.
The Chairman is not a judge, and is not rendering judgement. That’s a committee function.
This is not a trial. The committee functions as a grand jury. The witnesses before a grand jury are not in legal jeopardy and are typically not allowed council.
And they can’t hide from the subpoenas either. The only defense for a witness before a Grand Jury is the Fifth Amendment, which the witness cannot assert on behalf of any other party.
And just to underline how mindless your repetition of talking points really is; you make this obviously false claim.
“No cross examination of witnesses”. Really? What were Meadows and Collins doing?
Your claim about “facts and evidence” is even more obviously false. There are plenty of facts and evidence.
As for “heresay” witnesses. First, as I noted before, that’s false.
And even if it were true, the first hand witnesses are the ones your fool’s gold fuhrer is trying to hide.