- Joined
- Nov 20, 2013
- Messages
- 77,016
- Reaction score
- 59,208
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
So, a Russian Election Interference campaign that had its genesis in a cyber based disinformation campaign designed to poison and corrode our Constitution Republic does not meet some standard?
Sure. Spy on the Russians all you want.
American citizens were spied upon, and the rules are different. Spying on US citizens requires a FISA warrant.
So, the legal 'factual predicate' to justify the spying on US citizens applies. It doesn't to the Russians.
You are thinking about a criminal investigation which is not where this started and not where the FBI was in the time frame you are discussing. The FBI was running a counter-intelligence operation that ultimately bled into criminal investigation.
Criminal investigations start with a crime, and investigates to determine who is responsible for that crime.
Which crime was the factual predicate for the Trump / Russian Collusion hoax? Is there even a legal statute for 'collusion'?
Some one of these days we might have to separate the FBI into two agencies as opposed to having one agency conduct both Criminal Investigations and counter-intelligence Investigations. I could actually argue either side of that discussion and would likely win in debate regardless of what side I argued. Surely a sign that the actual answer to that question is not definitive at this point.
In this particular case what might be the case 'once of these days' doesn't apply. What applies is the situation at the time of the investigation.