• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Barr SMACKS DOWN the Infantile Fake News at Press Conference..naturally.

REPORTER: Is it an impropriety for you to come out and sort of spin the report before people are able to read it?

BARR: No.

*walks away*

John Q public: Reporter, is it impropriety for you to come out and sort of spin stories. That is leave out facts, editorialize, and edit vids to portray more of your views?

Reporter: Do we do that?

JQP: walks away shaking head.

imo, all news spins some. As well as politicians and people who work for them
 
You'll need to get rid of your wig and ruffles first. I rather expect you'll take a powder.

Look, son, you made a goofy statement. I tried to politely point out its goofiness. Since you can now only talk about me, I can only conclude that you need to be relegated to that group which is unable to actually discuss anything because they are only used to drone-like concurrence with their ideas. Are you in that group? If so, let me know so I don't waste my time.
 
We weren't wrong about the collusion stuff. I always said that we knew that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia; it just remained to be seen if crimes were committed in the process. I've said that repeatedly.

Mueller concluded that no crimes were committed in the process, though it's too early for you to start celebrating that point since Mueller also concluded that the Trump campaign's destruction of evidence made the Mueller team unable to resolve that satisfactorily.

Whether you want to admit it or not, your narrative crumbled today. Like I stated in 6 weeks you and those who think like you are going to want to go into hiding. And your exercises on this forum which match the efforts of the anti-Trump media are going to be demolished once and for all. The wheels of justice turn very slowly but when the truth comes out your ass will be grass and justice is the lawnmower.
 
Look, son, you made a goofy statement. I tried to politely point out its goofiness. Since you can now only talk about me, I can only conclude that you need to be relegated to that group which is unable to actually discuss anything because they are only used to drone-like concurrence with their ideas. Are you in that group? If so, let me know so I don't waste my time.

You're triggered so now's a good time for you to take a break.

Take a powder in other words.
 
You're triggered so now's a good time for you to take a break.

Take a powder in other words.

Right, you're talking about me but I'm the one triggered. Guess I got the answer to my question.
 
We weren't wrong about the collusion stuff. I always said that we knew that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia; it just remained to be seen if crimes were committed in the process. I've said that repeatedly.

Mueller concluded that no crimes were committed in the process, though it's too early for you to start celebrating that point since Mueller also concluded that the Trump campaign's destruction of evidence made the Mueller team unable to resolve that satisfactorily.

TOTAL BULL**** FROM YOUR OWN IMAGINATION.


NO COLLUSION/NO COOPERATION...at least from the Trump Campaign....JURY STILL OUT ON THE HILLARY/FUSIONGPS/KREMLIN CONNECTIONS...which were ALL POLITICAL, not BUSINESS.




bigger hoax needed.webp
 
Right, you're talking about me but I'm the one triggered. Guess I got the answer to my question.

Do you know what this says?

D4ddtjMX4AATXxN.png


I do. It says Trump knew about the Wikileaks ahead of time. Gee....I wonder how he could have known that without "collusion"?
 
Do you know what this says?

D4ddtjMX4AATXxN.png


I do. It says Trump knew about the Wikileaks ahead of time. Gee....I wonder how he could have known that without "collusion"?

Because Gates was HARASSING WIKILEAKS DAILY.

NO ONE EVEN KNEW who GUCCIFER was then.

Keep desperately grasping at straws...it's hilarious to watch.

NO COLLUSION NO COOPERATION.


Try to let that SOAK IN.

How did FUSIONGPS get RUSSIAN DIRT from KREMLIN-LINKED RUSSIANS, FOR THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN WITHOUT COLLUSION?

Looks like we'll be FINIDNG OUT.
 
Trumpers better hop off that train. It's heading for a wall. When Fox starts sounding like MSNBC, you know the train is about to hit the fan. :lamo
 
Right, you're talking about me but I'm the one triggered. Guess I got the answer to my question.

You answered your own question. Which is how the Right does questions and answers. Which is why your questions bore me. So do your powdered posts.
 
Trumpers better hop off that train. It's heading for a wall. When Fox starts sounding like MSNBC, you know the train is about to hit the fan. :lamo


Shepherd Smith =/= "FOXNEWS"....

Yeah...the report wasn't a CATASTROPHE for the RUSSIA LIARS.... :lamo



schiff.webp
 
Shepherd Smith =/= "FOXNEWS"....

Yeah...the report wasn't a CATASTROPHE for the RUSSIA LIARS.... :lamo


Ummm...the report is clear Russia interfered in the election, to aid Trump. That is just exactly what people have been saying. Apparently, "RUSSIA LIARS" means people who where right.

Also, check that caps lock key on your keyboard. It is broken.
 
The Right in Europe and in North America had got the word on Putin's return to the presidency in 2012. The word was Russian nationalism and expansionism and that Putin was the new global leader of Conservatives and Conservatism. That is, God and Conservatives are One and the Same to include their values of course.

And that Putin's Mother Russia party and the Republican party in the USA had different names but the same values. We see it today in the Putin-Trump Fanboys who want the USA to be more like Putin's Oldtime Russia than the other way around. USA Republicans never liked the Constitution which is why they are wreaking havoc against it. We know now the Putin-Trump Fanboys have indeed become what we once fought against, first in the Civil War then in WW II.

The Fanboys are fierce and absolute for Trump. The reason is that if the Right loses Trump they will lose their ultimate hero and model, Putin. That would be the Right's real loss and it would rob 'em of everything they believe in and fight for so blindly and doggedly but with their end goal clearly in mind.

Reinforcements have arrived for the ever jittery Right in that Barr and Trump have become bookends along Pennsylvania Avenue.
 
In about 6 weeks you are going to find out just how wrong you have been over this whole Russian collusion crap. And it is going to be easy to call out those on this forum that pushed the crap for over 2 years to be the real stooges. Stay tuned!

Zing! So very true!!!
 
You don't need that category if you are going to allow the President's legal team to be part of the redaction process which clearly is what happened here.
It is? based on what? Please be specific.



jnug said:
In fact, that category would be the most suspect category if the EP color code was seen as part of the redactions. Hence, Trumpets would have WANTED to avoid the category like the plague.
LOL, you're just blowing smoke. Try some Preparation H - should easy the butt hurt. :lamo
 
Whether you want to admit it or not, your narrative crumbled today. Like I stated in 6 weeks you and those who think like you are going to want to go into hiding. And your exercises on this forum which match the efforts of the anti-Trump media are going to be demolished once and for all. The wheels of justice turn very slowly but when the truth comes out your ass will be grass and justice is the lawnmower.

It sure as hell did...
 
In about 6 weeks you are going to find out just how wrong you have been over this whole Russian collusion crap. And it is going to be easy to call out those on this forum that pushed the crap for over 2 years to be the real stooges. Stay tuned!

Agreed.

And then there's still the matter of the 'factual predicate' for even justifying the initiation of the Trump / Russian collusion investigation, as well as the matter of administration / DOJ / FBI / NSA / CIA malfeasance during that time.
Maybe that factual predicate standard will be met. Maybe not. :shrug:
Maybe there was malfeasance by those organizations. Maybe not. :shrug:

I'm rather skeptical that the factual predicate standard was met, and rather suspicious that malfeasance by those organizations was committed.
To each their own, at least until the facts come out.

6 weeks until Horowitz's IG report?
Last one didn't really give any the FBI, Strzok, Page, McCabe or Comey (and a number of others) any real reasons to be proud. I'm thinking the same will be come from this one.

I suspect that Barr will be taken action based on the contents of this report. I mean face it. Someone has to redeem the DOJ's and FBI's public reputation after their politicization and use as political weapons by Obama.
 
Agreed.

And then there's still the matter of the 'factual predicate' for even justifying the initiation of the Trump / Russian collusion investigation, as well as the matter of administration / DOJ / FBI / NSA / CIA malfeasance during that time.
Maybe that factual predicate standard will be met. Maybe not. :shrug:
Maybe there was malfeasance by those organizations. Maybe not. :shrug:

I'm rather skeptical that the factual predicate standard was met, and rather suspicious that malfeasance by those organizations was committed.
To each their own, at least until the facts come out.

6 weeks until Horowitz's IG report?
Last one didn't really give any the FBI, Strzok, Page, McCabe or Comey (and a number of others) any real reasons to be proud. I'm thinking the same will be come from this one.

I suspect that Barr will be taken action based on the contents of this report. I mean face it. Someone has to redeem the DOJ's and FBI's public reputation after their politicization and use as political weapons by Obama.

So, a Russian Election Interference campaign that had its genesis in a cyber based disinformation campaign designed to poison and corrode our Constitution Republic does not meet some standard?

You are thinking about a criminal investigation which is not where this started and not where the FBI was in the time frame you are discussing. The FBI was running a counter-intelligence operation that ultimately bled into criminal investigation.

Some one of these days we might have to separate the FBI into two agencies as opposed to having one agency conduct both Criminal Investigations and counter-intelligence Investigations. I could actually argue either side of that discussion and would likely win in debate regardless of what side I argued. Surely a sign that the actual answer to that question is not definitive at this point.
 
Agreed.

And then there's still the matter of the 'factual predicate' for even justifying the initiation of the Trump / Russian collusion investigation, as well as the matter of administration / DOJ / FBI / NSA / CIA malfeasance during that time.
Maybe that factual predicate standard will be met. Maybe not. :shrug:
Maybe there was malfeasance by those organizations. Maybe not. :shrug:

I'm rather skeptical that the factual predicate standard was met, and rather suspicious that malfeasance by those organizations was committed.
To each their own, at least until the facts come out.

6 weeks until Horowitz's IG report?
Last one didn't really give any the FBI, Strzok, Page, McCabe or Comey (and a number of others) any real reasons to be proud. I'm thinking the same will be come from this one.

I suspect that Barr will be taken action based on the contents of this report. I mean face it. Someone has to redeem the DOJ's and FBI's public reputation after their politicization and use as political weapons by Obama.

There's enough evidence to know that the Obama administration politicized the intel community. P E R I O D !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There's enough evidence already gathered by Congress that shows wrong doing. PERIOD

Horowitz has seen it, Barr is aware of it. The investigation is going forward why? Because there IS evidence of wrongdoing,

In about six weeks the **** will hit the fan showing wrongdoing under the Obama administration. And Barr he has already seen enough evidence to pursue an investigation of wrongdoing. Yes the **** is about to hit the fan.
 
Hilarious watching Barr, once again, PIMP SLAPPING the SOPHOMORIC IDIOCY from the Fake News clowns at the press conference.


One of my faves: Left Twit: "You said he (Trump) faced an unprecedented situation..."

Barr:"Well, is there another precedent for it? "


Left Twit: "No".


Barr: " So then calling it 'unprecedented' was an accurate description."


Left Twit: : Der....umm....duh...." :lamo

Barr magnificently exposes the MELTING DOWN LEFT for the PETULANT, LITTLE BRATS THAT THAY ARE...and SPANKED THEM ACCORDINGLY. :spank:

What happened in your childhood that requires you to maintain this constant hatred to be content?
 
Back
Top Bottom