Atheists Don't Exist

[devildavid]

How do you know this? Or is this a story you've told yourself?

How do we know anything?

 

[Angel]

Still with the ad hominem.

You listed four types of evidence. I was just matching it up sequentially to your answer.

Still with the misuse of ad hominem. Reread the nine words looking out for the phrase "of your post."

 

[Angel]

More ad hominem.

How do you determine what ignorance is, let alone whether or not it is self-satisfied? And being open minded does not mean being open to anything that anyone can imagine or make up. Your mind is closed to the possibility of a godless universe. Find your rutabaga, and open your mind!

No "ad hominem" -- my comments are all about your posts.
Ignorance of something is not knowing it. Self-satisfaction is the manner in which something is expressed.

 

[devildavid]

Still with the misuse of ad hominem. Reread the nine words looking out for the phrase "of your post."

More ad hominem.

 

[devildavid]

No "ad hominem" -- my comments are all about your posts.
Ignorance of something is not knowing it. Self-satisfaction is the manner in which something is expressed.

Still ad hominem.

 

[Angel]

You really need to stop with the ad hominem posts.

Chutzpah is a good thing!

So, how is the physical evidence of the non physical?

And you really need to learn the proper use of "ad hominem."

Remember CharisRose!

 

[devildavid]

And you really need to learn the proper use of "ad hominem."

Remember CharisRose!

Your posts are often good examples of ad hominem and keep me sharp as far as identifying what ad hominem is.

 

[Angel]

How do we know anything?

Do we know anything?

 

[devildavid]

Do we know anything?

Do we know what the definition of god is?

 

[swing_voter]

Do we know what the definition of god is?

God is the owner(s) of the simulation we all exist in.

 

[Peter King]

Do we know what the definition of god is?

well according to some band god is a DJ, while Slayer says that god hates us all. I would say the definition of god is a fairy tale character but that is my personal point of view and many religious people will disagree, and quite rightly so because they too have freedom to believe or not to believe.

 

[Angel]

well according to some band god is a DJ, while Slayer says that god hates us all. I would say the definition of god is a fairy tale character but that is my personal point of view and many religious people will disagree, and quite rightly so because they too have freedom to believe or not to believe.

Atheists don't exist. It's only a fad. God is in every human heart deny it though some will.
Have a wonderful idyllic Northern European day, pilgrim.

 

[Peter King]

Atheists don't exist. It's only a fad. God is in every human heart deny it though some will.
Have a wonderful idyllic Northern European day, pilgrim.

It is windy and rainy here, but as always, pretty nice to live in nevertheless.

And Atheists do exist, something older than christianity is not a fad, you are just wrong about all of that as usual.

And as an atheist god is not in every human heart, as gods do not exist.

 

[Angel]

And Atheists do exist, something older than christianity is not a fad, you are just wrong about all of that as usual.

And as an atheist god is not in every human heart, as gods do not exist.

Question: Can you, Peter King, prove that atheists exist?
Answer: No more that theists Peter King has demanded proof of God from can prove God exists.

What goes around comes around.

 

[Peter King]

Question: Can you, Peter King, prove that atheists exist?
Answer: No more that theists Peter King has demanded proof of God from can prove God exists.

What goes around comes around.

Yup, loads of historical and personal evidence that atheists exist. We can prove the existence of atheists. We can also prove the existence of christians, muslims, jews, however there is zero proof that god exists.

And you are bull****ting the people here, I only ask for evidence when religious people say they have evidence/proof that is unshakable and obvious for everybody (even little old me or people like me). I have already discussed this but you must have been too busy falsely claiming atheists don't exist.

 

[Angel]

Yup, loads of historical and personal evidence that atheists exist. We can prove the existence of atheists. We can also prove the existence of christians, muslims, jews, however there is zero proof that god exists.

And you are bull****ting the people here, I only ask for evidence when religious people say they have evidence/proof that is unshakable and obvious for everybody (even little old me or people like me). I have already discussed this but you must have been too busy falsely claiming atheists don't exist.

Then you must be bull****ting. You claim atheists exist, and I asked you for the proof, and you provide nothing but more assertions that atheists exist. Where's the beef?

 

[Peter King]

Then you must be bull****ting. You claim atheists exist, and I asked you for the proof, and you provide nothing but more assertions that atheists exist. Where's the beef?

Just because you are bull****ting the whole thing here is your problem not mine. Atheists exists, even if you falsely claim otherwise.

 

[Angel]

Just because you are bull****ting the whole thing here is your problem not mine. Atheists exists, even if you falsely claim otherwise.

Atheists exist because you, Peter King, say they exist? Sorry, man. You are being held to the same standard you hold theists to. Where's the proof?

 

[Peter King]

Atheists exist because you, Peter King, say they exist? Sorry, man. You are being held to the same standard you hold theists to. Where's the proof?

You are telling things that are untrue. That you falsely claim things does not make them accurate. And atheist exist because they exist, that you keep falsely making up stuff does not change that.

 

[Angel]

You are telling things that are untrue. That you falsely claim things does not make them accurate. And atheist exist because they exist, that you keep falsely making up stuff does not change that.

"Atheists exist because they exist"?
Well then, God exists because God exists.

"How do like them eggrolls, Mr Goldstone?"

 

[Peter King]

"Atheists exist because they exist"?
Well then, God exists because God exists.

"How do like them eggrolls, Mr Goldstone?"

More nonsense. You are comparing apples and :bs

Atheist exist because they exist (people are atheists)

Catholics exists because they exist (people are catholics for example)

god is not a person so your comparison is total nonsense.

 

[Angel]

More nonsense. You are comparing apples and :bs

Atheist exist because they exist (people are atheists)

Catholics exists because they exist (people are catholics for example)

god is not a person so your comparison is total nonsense.

No, I'm comparing apples and apples, all rotten.
Demanding impossible proof in both cases.
Internet Skepticism has been outed for the charlatanry it is.

 

[Peter King]

No, I'm comparing apples and apples, all rotten.
Demanding impossible proof in both cases.
Internet Skepticism has been outed for the charlatanry it is.

Wrong, you are telling nonsense/porkies/:bs

Nobody is demanding proof of a christian that he is a christian, his word is his bond so to speak. The only charlatan is someone who claims this kind of nonsense.

 

[Angel]

Wrong, you are telling nonsense/porkies/:bs

Nobody is demanding proof of a christian that he is a christian, his word is his bond so to speak. The only charlatan is someone who claims this kind of nonsense.

You're not even reading my replies with comprehension. Maybe a larger font will help you, yes?

The comparison is between demanding proof of the existence of God and demanding proof of the existence of atheists -- comparing two impossible demands for proof.

 

[zyzygy]

Angel is a Hindu atheist.