Atheists Don't Exist

[Angel]

Angel is a Hindu atheist.

What's the goblin activity been like of late in idyllic Northern Europe, zyzygy?

 

[Peter King]

You're not even reading my replies with comprehension. Maybe a larger font will help you, yes?

The comparison is between demanding proof of the existence of God and demanding proof of the existence of atheists -- comparing two impossible demands for proof.

I am reading it, but even bigger fonts don't stop it from being absolute and utter nonsense.

You cannot compare the reality of there being atheists/christians/muslims/jews/hindu's/etc.etc.etc. with the fairy tale that magic people exist.

I don't ask people to prove that they are christians. Only when they claim that they have irrefutable evidence of the existence of god that I question them and ask for them to prove it. Your whole premise is just petty nonsense.

 

[Peter King]

What's the goblin activity been like of late in idyllic Northern Europe, zyzygy?

goblins are just like magic people in the sky, nonsense.

 

[Angel]

goblins are just like magic people in the sky, nonsense.

Your landsman zyzygy posted a proof of the existence of goblins in idyllic Northern Europe. Speak to him.

 

[Angel]

I am reading it, but even bigger fonts don't stop it from being absolute and utter nonsense.

It makes perfect sense. Impossible demand compared to impossible demand. I can't underwrite deficiency in reading comprehension.

 

[Rich2018]

I am an Atheist and I exist.

End of debate.

 

[Angel]

I am an Atheist and I exist.

End of debate.

'Fraid not, sport. That's personal testimony. A far cry from proof.

 

[Peter King]

Your landsman zyzygy posted a proof of the existence of goblins in idyllic Northern Europe. Speak to him.

More nonsense, he and I live in different countries. He lives in Flanders/Belgium. I live in the Netherlands. And again, perfectly idyllic.

 

[Angel]

More nonsense, he and I live in different countries. He lives in Flanders/Belgium. I live in the Netherlands. And again, perfectly idyllic.

Speak to zyzygy about the goblin problem. He offered the proof, not I.

 

[Peter King]

It makes perfect sense. Impossible demand compared to impossible demand. I can't underwrite deficiency in reading comprehension.

Nope, I don't demand christians to prove they are christians. Your who premise is totally false. And the issue is not my reading comprehension, the issue is your fake statements about atheists.

 

[Rich2018]

'Fraid not, sport. That's personal testimony. A far cry from proof.

Since no-one can know but me, it is as much proof as you can get.

It's like asking me to prove I like chicken to eat.


Can you prove that you believe in god ?

Would denying Christ's divinity be sufficient proof of skepticism ?

 

[Angel]

Nope, I don't demand christians to prove they are christians. Your who premise is totally false. And the issue is not my reading comprehension, the issue is your fake statements about atheists.

Only you are going on about demanding proof that Christians are Christians. That's not my argument; that's your misreading or deliberate misrepresentation. I understand why you don't wish to engage my argument, however. It undermines your internet persona so devastatingly it must be ignored by you.

 

[Angel]

Since no-one can know but me, it is as much proof as you can get....

To be sure, but it's not proof.

 

[Peter King]

Speak to zyzygy about the goblin problem. He offered the proof, not I.

as said, goblins don't exist.

 

[Angel]

as said, goblins don't exist.

And as I said, twice already, speak to zyzygy about this.

 

[Peter King]

Only you are going on about demanding proof that Christians are Christians. That's not my argument; that's your misreading or deliberate misrepresentation. I understand why you don't wish to engage my argument, however. It undermines your internet persona so devastatingly it must be ignored by you.

You are talking nonsense again. I do not demand proof that they are christians.

You are the one how misleads and misrepresents my views and the existence of atheists.

I don't engage your argument because you have none.

 

[Peter King]

And as I said, twice already, speak to zyzygy about this.

nothing he says changes the fact that goblins don't exist.

 

[Angel]

nothing he says changes the fact that goblins don't exist.

He proved that goblins exist in idyllic Northern Europe. See him about this. Stop pestering me.

 

[devildavid]

All human beings exist.
Atheists are human beings who lack belief in gods.
Therefore, atheists exist.

Perfectly logical, case closed!

 

[Peter King]

He proved that goblins exist in idyllic Northern Europe. See him about this. Stop pestering me.

Clearly you have no clue what pestering is, so here are a few truths (at least according to me, the atheist):

atheist exist

christians exist

werewolves do not exist

muslims exist

the tooth fairy does not exist

jews exist

gods do not exist

goblins do not exist

voldemort does not exist

nessie does not exist

hindu's do exist

You see where I am going, several of these things are groups of people who have either religious views based on their religious views and atheists, based on our atheist views. The rest are part of folklore, fantasy or books. They are fiction and do not exist.

That other people write that goblins exist is their right to do as is it my right to ignore it. That is not pestering you, that is giving an opinion/trying to have a meaningful exchange of views with you but sadly, that seems to be no longer possible.

The fact is that I do not ask christians to prove their god exist unless they say they can prove it, then I have the good right of ask them about this supposed evidence. That is not internet skepticism, that is good old scientific thinking/elementary dear Watson.

 

[Angel]

Clearly you have no clue what pestering is, so here are a few truths (at least according to me, the atheist):

atheist exist

christians exist

werewolves do not exist

muslims exist

the tooth fairy does not exist

jews exist

gods do not exist

goblins do not exist

voldemort does not exist

nessie does not exist

hindu's do exist

You see where I am going, several of these things are groups of people who have either religious views based on their religious views and atheists, based on our atheist views. The rest are part of folklore, fantasy or books. They are fiction and do not exist.

That other people write that goblins exist is their right to do as is it my right to ignore it. That is not pestering you, that is giving an opinion/trying to have a meaningful exchange of views with you but sadly, that seems to be no longer possible.

The fact is that I do not ask christians to prove their god exist unless they say they can prove it, then I have the good right of ask them about this supposed evidence. That is not internet skepticism, that is good old scientific thinking/elementary dear Watson.

Your post is a specimen of flaunted cluelessness.

 

[Peter King]

Your post is a specimen of flaunted cluelessness.

Nah, it just means that you really hate being contradicted and corrected when you write nonsense, you know, like the nonsensical view that there are no atheists.

 

[Angel]

Nah, it just means that you really hate being contradicted and corrected when you write nonsense, you know, like the nonsensical view that there are no atheists.

You can't prove otherwise, and now you know how it feels to squirm.

 

[Peter King]

You can't prove otherwise, and now you know how it feels to squirm.

:lamo Not going to happen, and I have proven otherwise, you just cannot prove your ridiculous assertion. You are just trying to post nonsense here and it ain't gonna work.

 

[Angel]

:lamo Not going to happen, and I have proven otherwise, you just cannot prove your ridiculous assertion. You are just trying to post nonsense here and it ain't gonna work.

You've proved nothing beyond your physical capacity to utter an English sentence, namely, "I am atheist."