In moral terms, your post is FITH;
SINCE MORALS ARE ARBIRATRAY AND WORTHLESS COMPARED TO ETHICS, WHY SHOULD I OR ANYONE ELSE CARE ABOUT THE IDIOTIC STATEMENTS OF "MORALISTS"??? Just go to multiple cultures, asking if it is moral to eat pork or drink alcohol or to be a woman with an uncovered head, and see for yourself how stupidly arbitrary/worthless are morals!
you are wielding the same ugly, baseless bigotry
UTTERLY, STUPIDLY, AND EVEN LYINGLY FALSE; I've already presented to you the data that
bigotry is about opinions not Objectively Verifiable Facts.
as every other hate group in history.
THEY WERE NOT USING OBJECTIVELY VERIFIABLE FACTS. Remember this Question (that you refuse to answer)?
"If you were visiting a modern well-equipped medical lab, and some madman with a machete cut your head off in an attempt to murder you, but rescuers arrived in time, would you want those rescuers to save your severed head, or save your headless human body, to save YOU-THE-PERSON?" Any decently-educated human
knows the Answer to that Question, very likely including yourself. But because you prefer to LIE about the Objectively Verifiable nature of personhood (
such that some scientists are convinced dolphins can qualify as persons), you refuse to Answer that Question!
OH, AND ANOTHER THING I MENTIONED TO YOU BEFORE: Your irrational definition of "person" Logically leads to the conclusion that brain-dead adults on full life-support,
formally declared to be corpses, deserve right-to-life.
In rational terms, your post is FITH;
A STUPID LIE, ALSO MERE WORTHLESS OPINION. Mostly because you don't support the following claim with any evidence whatsoever, so why should anyone believe you?
there is no rational basis or consistency in your words.
HAW! HAW!! HAW!!! As a long-time computer programmer, I know a great deal about rational consistency --computer programs simply don't work if they are not rationally consistent. And I bring that skill to my posts here. Facts are Facts, and Logic follows quite obviously. OF COURSE TO YOU, who seems to prefer irrationality (see logical consequences of your irrational definition of "person" above), it might be so obvious. And why should I care about that, eh?
In scientific terms, your claims are wildly inaccurate
A STUPID LIE, since I have supported my claims over and over again with linked evidence. The existence of a placenta as a vital organ for an unborn human makes it very different from an ordinary "baby" or "child" or "kid", because the unborn human uses that placenta to
steal resources from the body of its hostess, and more (as I've told you, with linked evidence, before). There is absolutely no inaccuracy on my part.
and demonstrably ignorant of basic scientific fact.
HAW! HAW!! HAW!!!
**I'M** the one who has been presenting a great many scientific facts in my links, while YOU have presented NONE! --even though you have been requested multiple times to present some facts.
Someone with mastery of middle school science would not make the errors you have made in your assertions.
I DON'T SEE YOU POINTING OUT ANY SPECIFIC ERROR --especially I don't see you presenting any facts contradicting even one of my statements-- so why should anyone believe your otherwise-worthless/nonsensical
claim?
On every level, your efforts are an abject failure.
ANOTHER UNSUPPORTED AND THEREFORE WORTHLESS CLAIM. Tsk, tsk!
