Two problems:
1) While the whole thing is yet ANOTHER giant Nothing Burger, the Democult is obsessed with this - and many other - lunatic shard/s of their "Trump is Putin/Hitler!!!" conspiracy theory, and cannot be reached by reason.
2) See 1.
Gee, let's see here. How'd we get here?
Democrats politicized federal intel and LEO agencies, and set them on spying on an opposition presidential campaign based on fraudulent FISA 'evidence'. This 'evidence' procured from a Hillary / DNC paid for private company, which in turn engages a Democrat friendly former MI-6 agent, who summarizes from a Russian source who has stated it was all fictitious to begin with.
Democrats shamelessly smeared in the worst possible way a SCOTUS appointee they didn't like.
Democrats and their media butt lickers hawked an alleged, and never proven, Trump / Russian collusion, and then used this as justification for the Mueller 'investigation'. The 'Russian collusion' narrative being invented by Fusion GPS Simpson back in '07 to be used against McCain. Just got dusted off and used again in this case.
Said investigation is lead by, and staffed by, strongly Democrat politically people with a mere alleged 'Republican' figure head, who, based on his own congressional testimony, didn't really know what was going on, and his #2, Weissman, the rabid Democrat / leftist, was the one pulling the strings.
Said politically driven and politically staffed investigation suffers from multiple likely prosecutorial misconduct, with the FBI senior staff altering evidence, for example, making an innocent person look guilty, and this appearance of guilty was used to extend the fraudulent FISA warrant 3 times, all under signed and sworn to as the truth be Comey.
And even so, this 'investigation' came up with nothing sufficient to criminally charge the president.
The House Democrats coordinate with, a now known to be Democrat supporter, in the intel agency, who's whistle blowing claim of concern came from second or third hand sources - or so he claims, yet, rather than bringing this to light, Democrats 'hide' and protect this person casting rather dubious claims.
House Democrats launch an impeachment action in the House on the basis of nary an contrary witness, and structure the 'rules' of this impeachment process in such a fashion that no other testimony other than what agrees with their politically driven narrative is heard, such is their concern for fairness and even-handedness, which is to say, not at all. This fan fair and seriousness of impeachment being made a politically driven mockery of what was intended, in the hopes of improving Democrat presidential candidates chances of beating Trump (so lousy are their candidates - call each other liars on the presidential debate stage - degrading yet another institution of the Republic).
Now, the House Democrats try to dictate to the Senate, (a co-equal branch of government and not a subservient branch of government, by the way), who's majority they do not hold (mind you they hold the majority in the House and in the Deep State), Democrats try to dictate to the Senate to conduct further investigation with new witnesses as part of the Senate impeachment trial, which is clearly the responsibility of the House as outlined in the Constitution, witnesses which they should have subpoenaed, and had those subpoenas been declined, taken to court, as precedence on this has been set, but discard precedence if it is to their own political advantage, yet another institution of the Republic which Democrats have degraded.
And Democrats wonder why clear headed and thinking people object to Democrats? What delusions of grandeur to they believe they live in?
Not just no. Oh hell no.
(apologies if I've missed any significant events, but this is what I recall off the top of my head. Do feel free to fill in where necessary for the sake of completeness)