WRONG, I said that private corrections facilities make money on it.
Are you going to try to say that they're building and maintaining privately owned facilities out of sheer patriotism and labor of love?
It bothered you enough that you derailed the subject of the question and made your very own pile of straw.
You didn't even read the rest of your article:
My question had absolutely nothing to do with AOC whatsoever.
You're the CEO (or a major stockholder) for a company that gets paid to warehouse illegals.
Do you want to see the flow of illegals stop or get larger?
Cessation of the illegals means no more profits.
My question demands that the person look at the insanity of private corrections, in even a larger sense than just the immigration question, it demands a person look at the insanity of private corrections in general.
If you make money off illegals, or off warehousing any kind of prisoners, you're going to want MORE prisoners, not less.
We saw that early on with AZ and lobbying for SB 1070. E.g.
Prison Economics Helped Drive Immigration Law : NPR
Bottom line is there's an inherent conflict when an industry makes money from jailing and warehousing people, and by extension the towns hosting the jails and supplying them, etc. It removes a point of opposition and creates a powerful advocate for more jails, more people detained, for longer periods.
You probably know better than I do that the same thing happened with 3-strikes laws - heavily lobbied for by private prison companies, and also I've read the unions of prison workers. More prisoners is good for business if you own prisons or work in them!
I've seen less direct evidence of it, but I have no doubt that the money made from prisoners at least does not HELP us deal with the War on Drugs effectively, because if we decriminalize drugs or shorten/end mandatory sentences, fewer are locked up, and private prisons rely on full prisons to spread out their fixed costs. Emptying them by even a quarter means they lose money (at least by some accounts). So they lobby against things that might slow prison population growth, and also BTW, write contracts that guarantee full prisons and it's the public ones that eat the losses. Etc.....
And the thing is the private prison companies are NOT shy about admitting this up front to investors, that tougher laws, more people jailed, is how they will grow and deliver good stock price gains. I've read numerous accounts of calls between prison companies and analysts where this is discussed like demand for shoes or clothing or cars. No reason not to discuss it because it's all obvious - they have a real and vested interest in locking as many people into cages for as long as possible, and will lobby when they can for stuff that makes them the most profits. It's how the system works.
It's also no different than, say, pollution. Companies make the most money when they offload the costs of pollution onto the rest of us, so their incentive is to eliminate laws that don't let them do that, because it costs them money and profits, and they don't care if people are harmed. The more harm they spread out to millions of people, the better their stock price at least in the short term.