AG Barr will review FBI’s actions in 2016 Trump probe

[jnug]

If anyone goes it will be more than one on this issue.

Eight criminal referrals sent to Attorney General William Barr

"five of the referrals are related to lying to Congress, misleading Congress and leaking classified information."

Thats interesting...NOT. The piece tells us what Nunes plans on "sending". You are telling us that he has already sent it.

Care to rationalize that? Its your link...not mine.

 

[akyron]

Which is a sentence fragment from Mueller used as a quote by Barr. Sad Bill Barr...Sad. We will wait for the full Mueller Report.

Dont hold your breath. We care for you.

 

[jnug]

Dont hold your breath. We care for you.

Thats not an answer but color me not surprised.

 

[akyron]

Thats interesting...NOT. The piece tells us what Nunes plans on "sending". You are telling us that he has already sent it.

Care to rationalize that? Its your link...not mine.

my bad. "being sent"...Fake news! Thank you for catching that. I am multitasking.

 

[jnug]

my bad. "being sent"...Fake news! Thank you for catching that. I am multitasking.

How about you tell us when the reporting is that they have been received by Justice. That way I can read the gibberish Hack Nunes would have put together to see if it might make any sense whatsoever.

 

[akyron]

How about you tell us when the reporting is that they have been received by Justice. That way I can read the gibberish Hack Nunes would have put together to see if it might make any sense whatsoever.

Roger Wilco.

 

[Grokmaster]

Thats interesting...NOT. The piece tells us what Nunes plans on "sending". You are telling us that he has already sent it.

Care to rationalize that? Its your link...not mine.

Wow. That's a major development.


Do the nits enjoy being picked?

 

[Grokmaster]

'Spying on a political campaign is a big deal': Attorney General Barr says Justice Department will look at origins of Russia probe



•Attorney General William Barr on Wednesday confirms that his Justice Department will be reviewing the origins and the methods of investigations into then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.
•"I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal," Barr says in testimony during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee's hearing on the Trump administration's fiscal 2020 budget proposal.
•"I think spying did occur," Barr says



AG Barr says Justice Department will look at origins of Russia probe


They are COMING HOME TO ROOST!!

 

[Grokmaster]

Oh...OBAMA SWAMP.....I'm coming......

 

[Slyfox696]

Barr seems to think otherwise.

Saying "I think" is not reasonable grounds, especially when you later state you have not seen evidence, as Barr did.

The grounds that you all have been presenting for the Mueller witch for the past two years has been "the only way to know if there was a crime, is to launch an investigation".

You literally just made that up.

Mueller's investigation was begun due to the numerous concerning links between Trump and Russians. We know there was an active counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign, based on EVIDENCE, in 2016. That, of course, is long before Mueller was assigned.

Illegal spying followed by seditious conspiracy are FEDERAL FELONIES...even for the Obama Swamp...the lying sleazeballs claim that they were conducting a "counter intel investigation", but didn't bother notifying the Trump Campaign = LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH.

What a shock, you posted a lie:

"In the weeks after he became the Republican nominee on July 19, 2016, Donald Trump was warned that foreign adversaries, including Russia, would probably try to spy on and infiltrate his campaign, according to multiple government officials familiar with the matter."

Source: FBI warned Trump in 2016 Russians would try to infiltrate his campaign


All you ever seem to do is post propaganda.

Not really-- for example FBI internal procedures requires evidence used to secure a FISA warrant to have been verified. That the dossier was used in the obtaining of a FISA warrant, and was not verified, yet used, seems like a reasonable avenue of investigation.

That has already been investigated and your statement was proven false.

Why do Trump defenders lie all the time?

Why not just tell the Trump campaign their concern?

They did.

"In the weeks after he became the Republican nominee on July 19, 2016, Donald Trump was warned that foreign adversaries, including Russia, would probably try to spy on and infiltrate his campaign, according to multiple government officials familiar with the matter."

Source: FBI warned Trump in 2016 Russians would try to infiltrate his campaign

 

[apdst]

Saying "I think" is not reasonable grounds, especially when you later state you have not seen evidence, as Barr did.
You literally just made that up.

Mueller's investigation was begun due to the numerous concerning links between Trump and Russians. We know there was an active counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign, based on EVIDENCE, in 2016. That, of course, is long before Mueller was assigned.
What a shock, you posted a lie:

"In the weeks after he became the Republican nominee on July 19, 2016, Donald Trump was warned that foreign adversaries, including Russia, would probably try to spy on and infiltrate his campaign, according to multiple government officials familiar with the matter."

Source: FBI warned Trump in 2016 Russians would try to infiltrate his campaign


All you ever seem to do is post propaganda.

That has already been investigated and your statement was proven false.

Why do Trump defenders lie all the time?

They did.

"In the weeks after he became the Republican nominee on July 19, 2016, Donald Trump was warned that foreign adversaries, including Russia, would probably try to spy on and infiltrate his campaign, according to multiple government officials familiar with the matter."

Source: FBI warned Trump in 2016 Russians would try to infiltrate his campaign

It's more than the FBI had to go on.

 

[Slyfox696]

It's more than the FBI had to go on.

No it's not. You just made that up.

 

[apdst]

No it's not. You just made that up.

Ok...what was the evidence they used to launch Crossfire Hurricane?

 

[Slyfox696]

Ok...what was the evidence they used to launch Crossfire Hurricane?

Code Name Crossfire Hurricane: The Secret Origins of the Trump Investigation - The New York Times

Google is your friend.

 

[apdst]

Code Name Crossfire Hurricane: The Secret Origins of the Trump Investigation - The New York Times

Google is your friend.

It's not my job to prove your argument, my friend.

The only evidence they had was the Steele Dossier and it was fake and they knew it was fake, that's why they lied to the FISA judge. Now, they're going to pay the piper for their treason.

 

[Slyfox696]

It's not my job to prove your argument

It is your responsibility to not ask questions whose answers are easily found though...

The only evidence they had was the Steele Dossier and it was fake and they knew it was fake, that's why they lied to the FISA judge. Now, they're going to pay the piper for their treason.

That is not at all what the link I sent you said. In fact, it is 100% a false statement. Why did you ask for the origins if you were just going to ignore the origins in favor of something you made up?

Also, the Steele dossier is not "fake" (you made that up) and the FBI informed the FISA court of the origins of the dossier. Literally everything you are saying is untrue.

 

[apdst]

It is your responsibility to not ask questions whose answers are easily found though...

That is not at all what the link I sent you said. In fact, it is 100% a false statement. Why did you ask for the origins if you were just going to ignore the origins in favor of something you made up?

Also, the Steele dossier is not "fake" (you made that up) and the FBI informed the FISA court of the origins of the dossier. Literally everything you are saying is untrue.

The FBI absolutely lied about the dossier:

Comey’s confession: dossier not verified before, or after, FISA warrant

Redirect Notice

 

[Slyfox696]

The FBI absolutely lied about the dossier:

You linked to a well known hack author posting an opinion piece which does not even support what you are saying. Truly an epic fail for you, apdst.

The FBI informed the court of the origins of the dossier, a dossier which has had numerous parts of it corroborated.

 

[apdst]

You linked to a well known hack author posting an opinion piece which does not even support what you are saying.

Truly an epic fail for you, apdst.

The FBI informed the court of the origins of the dossier, a dossier which has repeatedly been corroborated.

Comey testified under oath that the dossier wasn't verified.

The FBI stated under oath that it was.

That's perjury.

 

[Slyfox696]

Comey testified under oath that the dossier wasn't verified.

The FBI stated under oath that it was.

You obviously do not understand what the "dossier" is. The dossier is/was a series of memos containing raw intelligence. The raw intelligence supported other intelligence they had gathered (such as PapaD telling diplomats). This was used to request the ability to conduct additional investigation and the source of this raw intelligence was disclosed to the court.

Nothing you are saying is accurate.

 

[Grokmaster]

You obviously do not understand what the "dossier" is. The dossier is/was a series of memos containing raw intelligence. The raw intelligence supported other intelligence they had gathered (such as PapaD telling diplomats). This was used to request the ability to conduct additional investigation and the source of this raw intelligence was disclosed to the court.

Nothing you are saying is accurate.

Comey "understood what the dossier is" and he testified UNDER OATH, that is was UNVERIFIED, afterit had been used, more than once, for FISA warrants.

Your desperate attempts to rewrite the factual record are amusing and will become moreso, I am certain , as the Obama Swamp House of Cards comes tumbling down.

 

[Slyfox696]

Comey "understood what the dossier is" and he testified UNDER OATH, that is was UNVERIFIED, afterit had been used, more than once, for FISA warrants.

I already explained this through my discussion of raw intelligence. Also, unverified does not mean inaccurate nor does it prohibit accuracy. In fact, we know for a fact numerous parts of it HAS been corroborated.

Stop spreading propaganda.

 

[apdst]

You obviously do not understand what the "dossier" is. The dossier is/was a series of memos containing raw intelligence. The raw intelligence supported other intelligence they had gathered (such as PapaD telling diplomats). This was used to request the ability to conduct additional investigation and the source of this raw intelligence was disclosed to the court.

Nothing you are saying is accurate.

...and, it's unverified.

Steele admitted under oath that it's unverified:

Redirect Notice

 

[apdst]

I already explained this through my discussion of raw intelligence. Also, unverified does not mean inaccurate nor does it prohibit accuracy. In fact, we know for a fact numerous parts of it HAS been corroborated.

Stop spreading propaganda.

Without verification, the accuracy of the dossier is irrelevant.

 

[Slyfox696]

...and, it's unverified.

Numerous parts have been corroborated. As I said.

Steele admitted under oath that it's unverified:

Your link is from two years ago. Numerous parts have since been corroborated. As I said.

I eagerly look forward to the day you post something factual in this thread.

Without verification, the accuracy of the dossier is irrelevant.

Again, you clearly do not understand what raw intelligence is. And, again, numerous parts of it has been corroborated.