For starters, Pro-Lifers are not arguing that women shouldn't be allowed to use their own body parts or that the government should be forcing women to have their body parts removed. The argument here is whether or not, you should be allowed to destroy another human life. A fetus shouldn't be confused with a heart, liver, and so forth. It's another human life inhabiting another person's body.
There's a famous saying, it's not freedom, when you compromise other people's freedoms. In the case of pregnancies, we have two lives here. Unless we're talking about self-defense reasons -- the mother's health/life or the child's life --, there's no reason at all for abortions. I simply cannot accept the concept of abortion for inconvenience factors. Personal responsibility needs to be taken into consideration.
I will repeat my situation.
My pregnancy was initially unwanted. Clearly unplanned.
I was expected to have an easy pregnancy. I was the right age, excellent health, great insurance, great doctor and medical facilities. Excellent social support. Housing secure. Job securel
Because I had the LUXURY of decent medical care/secure job/secure/house/strong social ties....I thought I could make it work.
Despite projections, my pregnancy was full of complications. I had several serious complications that threatened my life/health/everything. On top of that another major issue cropped up that required me to a c-section .
Why is this important? What you call "an abortion for convenience" is a woman saying she lacks the personal, medical, and social resources to remain pregnant, let alone raise a child.
A woman who is under resourced would more than likely NOT have had the positive outcome that I did. I was able to go to a great OBGYN from the begining....that knew me. Because I was not in a rushed office with poor connections and resources. He saw a subtle sign that I am confident a rushed or less experienced MD would have missed. When he saw that subtle sign, he did further tests that showed my kidneys were compromised. I told to immediatly stop work and to have my only outings to be for medical reasons.
The salient points.
Because I had good insurance, I was not relegated to busy county clinics that probably would have found my signs too late.
Because I had good credit, I was able to absorb 10s of thousands of debt that I incurred being off for nearly 6 months (cobra payments were a bitch)
Because I had a good social structure, I had people helping me out and taking me to all of my required appointments to prevent further damage to my body.
Pregnancy is risky. And it is more risky if your are under-resourced.
What you consider "abortion for convenience" is frequently a woman weighing what her financial/medical/social resources match up with health and housing security.