Abortion 201

[Lursa]

You're trying desperately to change the subject. Look back and rediscover what we're talking about.

Er, no. You have attempted to switch it to grammar :doh

I keep asking you to return to your argument to defend it. And you cannot.

Feel free to take up your argument again any time.

 

[Angel]

Er, no. You have attempted to switch it to grammar :doh

I keep asking you to return to your argument to defend it. And you cannot.

Feel free to take up your argument again any time.

I offered the grammar lesson because you were reading my question incorrectly and just answering a question I didn't ask in order to avoid acknowledging that you'd been corrected.

 

[Lursa]

I offered the grammar lesson because you were reading my question incorrectly and just answering a question I didn't ask in order to avoid acknowledging that you'd been corrected.

I dont accept your concept of universality. It's a failed premise in the argument. If you choose to defend it more than you have so far (which failed and you resorted to your grammar convolutions)...then feel free.

 

[Angel]

I dont accept your concept of universality. It's a failed premise in the argument. If you choose to defend it more than you have so far (which failed and you resorted to your grammar convolutions)...then feel free.

That's not what we were discussing for twenty posts.

 

[Lursa]

That's not what we were discussing for twenty posts.

Then I guess your posts were so poorly written that they couldnt be followed! :lamo

 

[Angel]

Then I guess your posts were so poorly written that they couldnt be followed! :lamo

Or you post in bad faith. That's the smart bet.

 

[Quag]

Or you post in bad faith. That's the smart bet.

Irony meters explode!!!!!!!

 

[Lursa]

Or you post in bad faith. That's the smart bet.

In bad faith? You mean like you pretending I didnt understand your questions because of your poor grammar?

Or refusing (over and over and over) to provide sources that prove your view that the unborn is morally entitled to a right to life is universal and self-evident?

 

[Angel]

In bad faith? You mean like you pretending I didnt understand your questions because of your poor grammar?

Or refusing (over and over and over) to provide sources that prove your view that the unborn is morally entitled to a right to life is universal and self-evident?

Lady, you still don't understand the question.
And it is posed in perfect grammatical English.
This bull**** about sources has been answered for you twenty times if it was answered once. Your bad faith in posting is a matter of record.
Namaste.

 

[Lursa]

Lady, you still don't understand the question.
And it is posed in perfect grammatical English.
This bull**** about sources has been answered for you twenty times if it was answered once. Your bad faith in posting is a matter of record.
Namaste.

The fact that you are wrong...on this particular item and your entire argument is a matter of record.

Of that, I have no concerns.

 

[Quag]

Lady, you still don't understand the question.
And it is posed in perfect grammatical English.
This bull**** about sources has been answered for you twenty times if it was answered once. Your bad faith in posting is a matter of record.
Namaste.

Are you seriously going to try and claim that Lursa doesn't understand the question she asked you?
I mean even for you that is beyond absurd
You refuse to answer because you cannot answer and you know it

 

[Wan]

Are you seriously going to try and claim that Lursa doesn't understand the question she asked you?

Maybe she truly doesn't.

 

[Quag]

Maybe she truly doesn't.

Maybe the moon is made of cheese

 

[Wan]

Maybe the moon is made of cheese

Ok, so you are always right and Angel and I are always wrong.

Is this how it's going to be?

 

[Lursa]

Ok, so you are always right and Angel and I are always wrong.

Is this how it's going to be?

No, just the current track record for you both.

Honest attempts at discussion on your parts could change that impression...or not.

 

[Angel]

Are you seriously going to try and claim that Lursa doesn't understand the question she asked you?
I mean even for you that is beyond absurd
You refuse to answer because you cannot answer and you know it

What is at issue here, sir, is a question I asked her. Not a question she asked me.
Even when you're butting in, you don't know what you're talking about.
And par for the course, Lursa, chiming in here, doesn't even realize you have it ass-backwards.
That's how on the ball she is!

No, just the current track record for you both.

Honest attempts at discussion on your parts could change that impression...or not.

 

[Quag]

Ok, so you are always right and Angel and I are always wrong.

Is this how it's going to be?

Nope I can be wrong and it is possible that Angel is correct on occassion.
It is even pôssibel that ANgel might answer a question one day but it is unlikley

 

[Quag]

What is at issue here, sir, is a question I asked her. Not a question she asked me.
Even when you're butting in, you don't know what you're talking about.
And par for the course, Lursa, chiming in here, doesn't even realize you have it ass-backwards.
That's how on the ball she is!

Lol!!!

Angel she asked you a question you have never ever even attempted to answer (you never do)
So why would Lursa or anyone ever answer any question you ask?

*edit remember Angel this is what we had our falling out over. I asked repeatedly a question which you tried to dodge then finally you asked me one and demanded I answer yours before you would answer mine. When I called you out on it you were dishonest claiming you asked first (which I proved false by showing the posts) then starterd to insult me

 

[Angel]

Lol!!!

Angel she asked you a question you have never ever even attempted to answer (you never do)
So why would Lursa or anyone ever answer any question you ask?

*edit remember Angel this is what we had our falling out over. I asked repeatedly a question which you tried to dodge then finally you asked me one and demanded I answer yours before you would answer mine. When I called you out on it you were dishonest claiming you asked first (which I proved false by showing the posts) then starterd to insult me

Beat it. You don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Quag]

Beat it. You don't know what you're talking about.

You beat it You have no clue what you are talking about and when challenged you just dishonestly divert and insult
If you want to debate then debate. If you want to preach to a Church but here at DP you are expected to defend your claims. You seem to think that you are special and have no need to do so
You are not special and your claims will be challenged.

 

[Wan]

If you want to preach to a Church but here at DP you are expected to defend your claims.

Not sure where this came from. As far as I can see, Angel has not invoked any religious arguments.

 

[Angel]

Not sure where this came from. As far as I can see, Angel has not invoked any religious arguments.

The opposition does not read what we post; they just look for an opportunity to post their talking points. They cannot think out of the little box their opinions are stored in for safekeeping.

 

[Quag]

Not sure where this came from. As far as I can see, Angel has not invoked any religious arguments.

It was referring to Angel wanting to tell us what is the true moral position, ( ie preach) instead of actually entering into debate and defend his claims

 

[Quag]

The opposition does not read what we post; they just look for an opportunity to post their talking points. They cannot think out of the little box their opinions are stored in for safekeeping.

No Angel either you fail to read or fail to understand what is posted. You make unsupported claims you want everyone to accept as true and when they dont you refuse to defend them resorting to dishonesty, diversion and dersision

 

[Angel]

No Angel either you fail to read or fail to understand what is posted. You make unsupported claims you want everyone to accept as true and when they dont you refuse to defend them resorting to dishonesty, diversion and dersision

Stalk someone else, man. If my argument is mere opinion, what is your opinion of my argument? You've posted the same post a thousand times: "That's just your opinion, Angel."
All right, and that's your opinion. Now stalk someone else.