Abortion 201

[year2late]

So a fetus is living. Does this mean it's alive?

Yes or no.

What the hell are you talking about . What do you think a fetus is living means?

 

[Logician Man]

What the hell are you talking about . What do you think a fetus is living means?

:lol:

 

[Wan]

What the hell are you talking about . What do you think a fetus is living means?

I was under the impression that you claimed the unborn is not alive. Correct me if wrong.

 

[year2late]

I was under the impression that you claimed the unborn is not alive. Correct me if wrong.

A fetus is living.

What do you think that means? How many times do I need to say that?

Now if you ask me is it a living person or human being. I will say it is not a person or a human being. The fetus in in a human will become a human being after birth. I accept you may have a different definition. I just do not agree.

And again, one last time. A fetus is living.

 

[Wan]

A fetus is living.

What do you think that means?

I think it means you admit that a fetus is alive. And I was hoping to get a confirmation from you.

 

[year2late]

I think it means you admit that a fetus is alive. And I was hoping to get a confirmation from you.

What the hell do you think I have been saying???????

It is living.

 

[Wan]

What the hell do you think I have been saying???????

It is living.

Ok then. For some reason I thought you claimed the fetus is not alive.

 

[year2late]

Ok then. For some reason I thought you claimed the fetus is not alive.

What the hell are you talking about?

 

[Wan]

What the hell are you talking about?

I got confused by your lot (the pro-choicers). And you can't blame me because you speak nonsense in the same manner as one another.

 

[year2late]

The fetus is living but since it does not live without being physiologically attached, it is not a living human being.

A fetus is living.

What does a parasite have to do with anything?

What the hell are you talking about . What do you think a fetus is living means?

A fetus is living.

What do you think that means? How many times do I need to say that?

Now if you ask me is it a living person or human being. I will say it is not a person or a human being. The fetus in in a human will become a human being after birth. I accept you may have a different definition. I just do not agree.

And again, one last time. A fetus is living.

What the hell do you think I have been saying???????

It is living.

I got confused by your lot (the pro-choicers). And you can't blame me because you speak nonsense in the same manner as one another.

Yeah, I can blame you.

I have repeatedly said the same thing over and over and over.

 

[Lursa]

I've replied to your silly demand for "proof" of self-evident truth a dozen times. Your strategy of repeating it endlessly after its been answered to the satisfaction of any reasonable person demonstrates once again the bad faith of your posts. Find Quag and do your echo-chamber routine. Quit bothering me with know-nothing posts.

Where? What post?

Your attempt to prove that using your erroneous conclusions about science and an instinct for self-preservation turned into a "science-based' moral right to life was total bull****, so forget that.

But hey, if you proved your case and I missed it...post # please!

 

[Lursa]

Answer my questions. Are parasites alive or not? Are premature babies alive or not?

Who says being alive is a criteria to have a right to life?

That's what Angel claims...that the unborn are entitled to a right to life. Who says?

Apparently, our govt, many other govts, and millions, even billions of people worldwide dont agree with you. No human rights organizations, American or international, agree. (perhaps some religious ones do).

So why should other women be forced to submit to your opinion?

 

[Wan]

Yeah, I can blame you.

I have repeatedly said the same thing over and over and over.

For your information, I do not pay close attention to what you (or the other pro-choicers) say. And yes sometimes I make a mistake and confuse one of you for another of you. But this is understandable because you all talk the same.

 

[Angel]

Where? What post?

Your attempt to prove that using your erroneous conclusions about science and an instinct for self-preservation turned into a "science-based' moral right to life was total bull****, so forget that.

But hey, if you proved your case and I missed it...post # please!

Another of your "debating" strategies I'm now hip to.
Does it still rain a lot out there?

 

[year2late]

For your information, I do not pay close attention to what you (or the other pro-choicers) say. And yes sometimes I make a mistake and confuse one of you for another of you. But this is understandable because you all talk the same.

I repeated it many times in a short period of time.

 

[Wan]

I repeated it many times in a short period of time.

Did you? Sorry, I was not paying attention.

 

[Lursa]

Another of your "debating" strategies I'm now hip to.
Does it still rain a lot out there?

Yes...asking a person to support their opinion in an argument is a legitimate debating stragety.

Now that you are aware of this...please try it instead of pathetically flogging us with your personal opinion over and over.

 

[Quag]

Where? What post?

Your attempt to prove that using your erroneous conclusions about science and an instinct for self-preservation turned into a "science-based' moral right to life was total bull****, so forget that.

But hey, if you proved your case and I missed it...post # please!

Standard Angel tactic after you have repeatedly asked a question he will not/cannot answer he will just claim that he already has, figuring enough pages have gone by that no one will go back and repost all his silly non answers. He doesn't fool anyone except maybe himself

 

[Angel]

...was total bull****, so forget that....

The pro-abortion idea of debate.

 

[Lursa]

total bull****, so forget that.

The pro-abortion idea of debate.

Here's the entirety of the quote you dishonestly clipped because you were unable to actually argue against it

:lamo:lamo:lamo

Where? What post?

Your attempt to prove that using your erroneous conclusions about science and an instinct for self-preservation turned into a "science-based' moral right to life was total bull****, so forget that.

But hey, if you proved your case and I missed it...post # please!

And in several previous posts I even explained why your conclusions the bold were wrong :doh

Thanks for this quick example of just how pathetically far you've failed in your attempts to defend your argument: blatant dishonesty and clear avoidance.

 

[Angel]

Here's the entirety of the quote you dishonestly clipped because you were unable to actually argue against it

:lamo:lamo:lamo



And in several previous posts I even explained why your conclusions the bold were wrong :doh

Thanks for this quick example of just how pathetically far you've failed in your attempts to defend your argument: blatant dishonesty and clear avoidance.

Didn't need the entire bit of nonsense; your "argument" was enough.

 

[Lursa]

Didn't need the entire bit of nonsense; your "argument" was enough.

Fine...then stop posting your nonsense and just admit I was right and move on.

 

[Angel]

Fine...then stop posting your nonsense and just admit I was right and move on.

You are wrong in so many ways it's not even funny. If I didn't like you I'd have given you the air by now.

 

[Lursa]

You are wrong in so many ways it's not even funny. If I didn't like you I'd have given you the air by now.

You are flailing. And failing.

If you had some means of defending your 'argument,' you would have by now. But instead, all you do is focus on your own poor grammatical structure and complain it wasnt understood.

Get back to me when you are capable of further defense of your argument.

 

[Angel]

You are flailing. And failing.

If you had some means of defending your 'argument,' you would have by now. But instead, all you do is focus on your own poor grammatical structure and complain it wasnt understood.

Get back to me when you are capable of further defense of your argument.

You're trying desperately to change the subject. Look back and rediscover what we're talking about.