A Question To Pro-Choice People

[Lursa]

Re: @ least two errors there

Some people think it is cruel to force a mother to keep her unborn baby alive.

So then you arent one of those, correct? You are "one of the people" that thinks it's fine for the govt to force a woman to remain pregnant against her will? Yes or no? Violating her Constitutional rights and bodily sovereignty? Up to and including her life (even the govt cant save a woman from dying in childbirth).

For myself, of course it would be cruel to force women to do that (in your quote)...cruel, barbaric, unAmerican, and unChrisitian.

 

[Lursa]

Re: @ least two errors there

Some unborn babies are still alive when the abortionist first begins to cut it apart in the womb. Most unborn babies aborted by a particular partial birth abortion method are still alive when the abortionist stabs it in the base of the skull and sucks its brains out to make it easier to get the head out of the womb.

No...that is illegal. By law, the Dr must give the lethal injection first. That abortion method is no longer legal either. Stop using bad information, it makes your views look even more neanderthalic.

 

[Peter King]

Re: @ least two errors there

No, Terri did not want that. That is what was testified to in court and found in court. And I am not sure they were good christians, they were attention addicted idiots who did not have the best interest of their daughter in mind. They wanted the money that was given to Terri and her husband.

He loving husband and numerous courts of laws decided that she would be allowed to die, anything beyond that is just your over active imagination in combination with bold faced untruths.

DOH, Her loving husband, not he loving husband :3oops:

That is what you get when you do middle of the night posting.

 

[Scrabaholic]

Re: @ least two errors there

Her parents offered to care for Terri at no cost to the state. Her hateful husband already had two kids by the other woman and he was fighting Terri's parents over the $750,000 that was awarded to Terri's caregivers for her care.

If her parents had the money to take care of her, why was she on Medicaid?

The money that was awarded to her had run out. There was none left.

 

[Scrabaholic]

Re: @ least two errors there

You just needed one decision to make abortion legal and you just need one decision to establish the fact that unborn babies are living human beings with rights. There have been several cases, however, and not just one. I see no reason for me to hunt down every case and post it here for you, since we only need one.

IOW, you can't back up your claim. I accept your surrender.

 

[Peter King]

Re: @ least two errors there

The mother should decide whether the unborn baby is a worthy human being or not?

No, she should have the right to decide if she wants to have an abortion.

 

[Peter King]

Re: @ least two errors there

You falsely accuse the parents of loving money and hating their daughter. That is an evil accusation and clearly biased to support the evil intentions of the evil husband to kill her.

I never said they hated their daughter, that is a distortion/lie of what I said. I said they did not have their daughters best interest at heart, and that is not an evil accusation that a fact.

And her loving husband only wanted to let his wife finally die with some dignity rather than being forced to remain a vegetable.

 

[Scrabaholic]

Re: @ least two errors there

Killing your own unborn baby is OK but killing your own pet is a crime? What kind of evil logic is that?

Here. I'll pull a Tosca and see if that helps you understand.

Killing animals is not illegal.

 

[Scrabaholic]

Re: @ least two errors there

Killing your pet is perfectly legal when euthanized by a vet, just as a woman goes to a clinic to terminate her pregnancy by a licensed physician.

I believe you can also do it yourself as long as it's done humanely. Farmers put down their animals all the time with a shot to the head. I once had a teacher who euthanized his own dog by lethal injection (it was an animal care course and he knew how to do it).

 

[Lursa]

Re: @ least two errors there

I believe you can also do it yourself as long as it's done humanely. Farmers put down their animals all the time with a shot to the head. I once had a teacher who euthanized his own dog by lethal injection (it was an animal care course and he knew how to do it).

Again...we've posted facts again and again for that poster and he just continues to lie and post crap. It's very dishonest to try and force God's Word on others using lies...a very big sin.

 

[Scrabaholic]

Re: @ least two errors there

Again...we've posted facts again and again for that poster and he just continues to lie and post crap. It's very dishonest to try and force God's Word on others using lies...a very big sin.

Agreed. There is even a commandment about lying (bearing false witness).

 

[year2late]

Re: @ least two errors there

Agreed. There is even a commandment about lying (bearing false witness).

Thou shalt not throw crap against the wall to see what sticks.


If people have to lie to prove their point...their point probably is not worth making

 

[tosca1]

Sex.

How do you not know about human reproduction?

Lol. You don't get it. Who allowed that penis inside her body? hello?
She's the one who has sole control of her body, right? :lol:

What? You're saying these women are morons - they don't know the possible consequence of copulation?
They're nitwit who never heard of contraception?

If you can't grasp what I'm saying - goodbye!

 

[Lursa]

Lol. You don't get it. Who allowed that penis inside her body?

If you can't grasp what I'm saying - goodbye!

You still havent explained why a woman must be punished with a child (since you believe she must be forced to accept 'her consequences') if she decides to have sex?

She is not obligated to do so, not morally, not legally. You dont like it...yeah, we get it. But there's no authority that says she's wrong (none that adult Americans need to accept anyway).

Who says she's wrong if she decides that an abortion is what's best for her life and that of her family, current and future?

 

[tosca1]

You still havent explained why a woman must be punished with a child (since you believe she must be forced to accept 'her consequences') if she decides to have sex?

Hahahahaha :lamo

Go think hard about it! Hahahahaha Oh, Lursa.....hahahaha

 

[Lursa]

Hahahahaha :lamo

Go think hard about it! Hahahahaha Oh, Lursa.....hahahaha

I know you cant answer it...but you look foolish admitting so like this.

I can answer for you if you'd like: you value the unborn more than women that enjoy behaviors you disapprove of. Happily, none of these women are subject to your opinions.

 

[tosca1]

No one has any rights simply by virtue of being human. Not me, not you, not anybody. Rights only exist as a mutual agreement between people.

Lol. What a load of baloney! This is the kind of thinking that props up pro-choice!
They're all the same! :mrgreen:

So....what's all this about "human rights?"

If you and I both agree to beat up Lursa - that's our mutual agreement - I suppose that becomes our "right?" :lol:


Here:

Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, whatever our nationality, place of residence, sex, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, language, or any other status.

Equal and non-discriminatory

OHCHR |
What are Human Rights


REGARDLESS OF STATUS - even if you're just at the beginning stage of your humanity (like the fetus),
or at the very end of the line (like a senile elderly)....you still have the same rights as everyone else!

The improvement of one right facilitates advancement of the others. Likewise, the deprivation of one right adversely affects the others.

Setting up a group (women) to be above another human (unborn), adversely affects others....
......because it renders this so-called human rights declaration, a farce!

If one group can be superior over another - what's stopping others to do the same?
We can do it - be superior - to minority groups! To the vulnerable!

 

[tosca1]

I know you cant answer it...but you look foolish admitting so like this.

I can answer for you if you'd like: you value the unborn more than women that enjoy behaviors you disapprove of. Happily, none of these women are subject to your opinions.

I'm laughing because the answer has always been there all along.
It's been given in other abortion threads as well!
The problem is with you. :shrug:
I can't help you, sorry - you'll have to do some serious reading.
I can't spoon-feed you. Boy, does that remind me of another pro-choice argument - viability! :lol:

Being a woman, your body (which includes your brain)....... is your own responsibility.
Isn't that how it's supposed to be? Review my posts.

 

[tosca1]

I'll be very busy these days.....so, I won't be responding to stale and silly responses, unless I feel like it.

 

[smallvoice]

Women are free to have sex. She is not obligated in anyway to put up with consequences you demand and she doesnt want.

That's one of the key lessons today's young women should learn.

But if you think they turn into such 'bad citizens,' why would you want them expanding their "undesireablity" to raising children?

So you support not being responsible for your actions. Thank you, that was what we needed to hear.

 

[AGENT J]

So you support not being responsible for your actions. Thank you, that was what we needed to hear.

What responsibility are you talking about?

 

[smallvoice]

Women are free to have sex. She is not obligated in anyway to put up with consequences you demand and she doesnt want.

That's one of the key lessons today's young women should learn.

But if you think they turn into such 'bad citizens,' why would you want them expanding their "undesireablity" to raising children?

No one can stop them from being rabbits, but themselves. It is they who seem to want to spread that undesirable trait.

 

[smallvoice]

Forcing women to gestate against their will is reprehensible.

No one is forcing them to copulate .

 

[year2late]

Lol. You don't get it. Who allowed that penis inside her body? hello?
She's the one who has sole control of her body, right? :lol:

What? You're saying these women are morons - they don't know the possible consequence of copulation?
They're nitwit who never heard of contraception?

If you can't grasp what I'm saying - goodbye!

And thank you for the slut shaming moment.

Now back to the thread.

 

[smallvoice]

What responsibility are you talking about?

Please pay attention. No one else has the problem.