A Question To Pro-Choice People

[smallvoice]

And thank you for the slut shaming moment.

Now back to the thread.

"She" is the slut shamer, it's a self inflicted wound.

 

[AGENT J]

Please pay attention. No one else has the problem.

LOL you can dodge the question and wuss out from answering it if you like since it exposes your stance but ill just ask it again, to expose your stance again

What responsibility?

 

[AGENT J]

No one is forcing them to copulate .

whats that have to do with forced gestation? oh thats right nothing lol.

 

[smallvoice]

LOL you can dodge the question and wuss out from answering it if you like since it exposes your stance but ill just ask it again, to expose your stance again

What responsibility?

You need to follow along better. I'm not going to spoon feed you. It's already been covered.

 

[AGENT J]

You need to follow along better. I'm not going to spoon feed you. It's already been covered.

another dodge and the exposure of your false claims continues, LMAO AWESOME!
ill ask you AGAIN

what responsibility?


who bets my question is dodged again?
opcorn2:

 

[smallvoice]

whats that have to do with forced gestation? oh thats right nothing lol.

So you think copulation has nothing to to with "forced gestation? Go back and slap your HS Biology teacher.

 

[smallvoice]

LOL you can dodge the question and wuss out from answering it if you like since it exposes your stance but ill just ask it again, to expose your stance again

What responsibility?

Ask all you want, I'm not going to explain it to you.

 

[AGENT J]

1.)So you think copulation has nothing to to with "forced gestation?
2.) Go back and slap your HS Biology teacher.

1.) its not a thought, its a fact, it doesnt....
2.) if you disagree by all means please explain to us and list the facts of biology that FORCES gestation . . we'd love to read it!!!

this is going to be hilarious!

opcorn2:

 

[AGENT J]

Ask all you want, I'm not going to explain it to you.

oh dont worry i will because i love exposing your failed posts and retarded lies that you cant support with any facts

ill ask you again:

what responsibility tare you speaking of?

 

[stacie01872]

"Legalized murder" is an oxymoron. "Murder" is a legal term.

Agreed. I think we should call it "extermination".

 

[Lursa]

I'm laughing because the answer has always been there all along.
It's been given in other abortion threads as well!
The problem is with you. :shrug:
I can't help you, sorry - you'll have to do some serious reading.
I can't spoon-feed you. Boy, does that remind me of another pro-choice argument - viability! :lol:

Being a woman, your body (which includes your brain)....... is your own responsibility.
Isn't that how it's supposed to be? Review my posts.

This is incoherent. It's not an argument.

And why would I waste time reviewing your posts when they are empty of facts and full of dogma?

 

[Lursa]

So you support not being responsible for your actions. Thank you, that was what we needed to hear.

I believe that I've posted this before but abortion is a very responsible option:

--is it responsible to have a child you cannot afford and know you will have to take taxpayer $$ in public assistance?

--Is it responsible to have a child when you know you will not stop smoking, drinking, drugging and have a much higher risk of causing defects in the unborn?

--Is it responsible to have a child when you know it means not being able to keep your commitments and obligations to your current dependents, your employer, your community?

--Is it responsible to have a child just to put it up for adoption when there are over 100,000 kids in the US waiting to be adopted now? Meaning that for each unnecessary newborn, one more of those kids hoping for a family will go without?

You really didnt think that one through, did you?

 

[Lursa]

No one can stop them from being rabbits, but themselves. It is they who seem to want to spread that undesirable trait.

You didnt answer the question:

if you think they turn into such 'bad citizens,' why would you want them expanding their "undesireablity" to raising children?

You have been clear that if you had the choice, you would see these people forbidden from having abortions. If they are so bad and will only take more public assistance and be more likely to raise ignorant/dangerous kids...what is your reasoning here?

 

[tosca1]

And thank you for the slut shaming moment.

Now back to the thread.

What "slut-shaming?"
Are sluts the only ones who get pregnant? :lol:

Btw, they could even get something more nasty than just normal pregnancy!
They could end up with......... STD!

You'd think women would wise up, and insist on condoms!



My statement is bang-on. Why don't you answer the question?

Pro-choice's argument is that, the woman has autonomy of her body:
If she's the one who has sole control - then, the buck stops with her!
She's the one who's ultimately responsible!

So.....how did she end up with a baby living inside her?

Who allowed that penis inside her body? hello?
She's the one who has sole control of her body, right?

What? You're saying these women are morons - they don't know the possible consequence of copulation?
They're nitwits who never heard of contraception?

 

[Lursa]

No one is forcing them to copulate .

And yet they have every right to do so and you have zero right to stop them.

People may enjoy all the sex they want.

 

[marke]

Re: @ least two errors there

Actually the intact D and E abortion ( nick named partial birth abortion ) was invented as an alternative to a dismemberment abortion.

But that is moot since Partial birth abortions are banned.

Post birth abortions are now in vogue with modern democrat politicians. It is scary how far left modern democrat candidates are going in seeking to overthrow Trump in 2020.

 

[marke]

Re: @ least two errors there

There is evidence of possible collusion with the Russians. it is your narrow mind that makes you believe that Trump is the only one being investigated.

Interesting enough, I have ZERO clue what the report will show. I do not want any foreign power to interfere with the election process, do you?

Are you open to what a report may show ?

We already know from Lisa Pager's testimony that the FBI spent 8 months investigating possible collusion between Trump and Russia and they found nothing at all. So leftists doubled down and appointed Mueller to look some more, which he has done and has still come up empty. Talking about throwing millions in tax monies down the democrat drain.

 

[marke]

Re: @ least two errors there

Stop lying. Really.

Stop falsely accusing me of lying. Really.

 

[marke]

Re: @ least two errors there

Exactly an unborn has not rights.

States have rights if a crime against the pregnant occurred and the unborn was killed, charges can be brought against the perpetrator.

By UNited States Code an unborn is not a person/human being/child/ individual.

According to radical leftists, faithful democrats, Nazi infanticidists, biased biologists, corrupted doctors, ungodly God-rejecting morons, and a possible drunk or two in the gutter, unborn human babies are not living human beings.

 

[marke]

Re: @ least two errors there

No. It is already dead and doesn't feel a thing. And that is not first trimester abortion, which is elective and 92% of all abortions.

The baby does not feel a thing before or after its head is severed from its body by the abortionist butcher?

 

[marke]

Re: @ least two errors there

Does it cause suffering?
Actually, you didn't.
What??? Your response seems like a dodge from the fact you were caught using a source that proved you wrong.

Don't be silly.

 

[marke]

Re: @ least two errors there

No, unless this is also true: you 'allegedly have a brain.'

Even tho you dont demonstrate the signs of having a brain, science can experiment and detect the presence of one.

Which do you prefer? My guess about you not having a brain, or the *fact* that science had determined you must have one?

Who said unborn babies don't have brains? Dr. Kevorkian? The Marquis de Sade? Al Gore?

 

[marke]

Re: @ least two errors there

Are you incapable of reading? I and others wrote that killing your pet is not a crime.

You cant even accurately discuss what's directly in front of you. :roll:

If I want a fatally injured animal killed, all I have to do is take it to an approved pet butcher, like a licensed abortionist if I want an unborn baby removed for convenience?

 

[marke]

Re: Follow the bouncing ball

Why would a woman that loves her unborn baby have an abortion? :doh

Good question.

 

[Lursa]

Re: @ least two errors there

Who said unborn babies don't have brains? Dr. Kevorkian? The Marquis de Sade? Al Gore?

Good question: who said unborn babies don't have brains?

I didnt.

Still not capable of direct answers to the questions I did ask tho I see.