• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

“White Fragility” Prevents White Americans from Confronting Racism

Here is her problem:

This concept came out of my on-going experience leading discussions on race, racism, white privilege and white supremacy with primarily white audiences. It became clear over time that white people have extremely low thresholds for enduring any discomfort associated with challenges to our racial worldviews. We can manage the first round of challenge by ending the discussion through platitudes — usually something that starts with “People just need to,” or “Race doesn’t really have any meaning to me,” or “Everybody’s racist.” Scratch any further on that surface, however, and we fall apart.

Socialized into a deeply internalized sense of superiority and entitlement that we are either not consciously aware of or can never admit to ourselves, we become highly fragile in conversations about race. We experience a challenge to our racial worldview as a challenge to our very identities as good, moral people. It also challenges our sense of rightful place in the hierarchy. Thus, we perceive any attempt to connect us to the system of racism as a very unsettling and unfair moral offense.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/good...k-to-white-people-about-racism_b_7183710.html

She has taken the closed mindedness (Rot) that is all around Western Civilization now (to include at DP) which is a result of the decline of the civilization and the resulting mad panicked dash to UTOPIA as we sense things going bad and then she pivots to "SEE SEE....White people Suck!". She either never looked around enough to notice that this closed mindedness is everywhere and thus not about race which would make her stupid, or else she is lying because she has an agenda to sell.

It could be either or or both.
 
Last edited:
The two sides are not equal when it comes to truths and morality. Todays Right Ideology created America. Although far from perfect it is the greatest most prosperous nation in all human history. Todays Left Ideology killed 150 million people and has created nothing but death and destruction.

Do you have anymore hyper partisan crazy crap to share or was that all?
 
Here is her problem:


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/good...k-to-white-people-about-racism_b_7183710.html

She has taken the closed mindedness (Rot) that is all around Western Civilization now (to include at DP) which is a result of the decline of the civilization and the resulting mad panicked dash to UTOPIA as we sense things going bad and then she pivots to "SEE SEE....White people Suck!". She either never looked around enough to notice that this closed mindedness is everywhere which would make her stupid, or else she is lying because she has an agenda to sell.

It could be either or or both.

///// The American left never had the right to control minds or conversations...that is abuse....and it has to be over /////// Does this proclamation also apply to the American Right?
 
///// The American left never had the right to control minds or conversations...that is abuse....and it has to be over /////// Does this proclamation also apply to the American Right?

Connect your query to the thread you put it in.
 
The idea is to read the article, think about it a minute and then see if any of it jibes with reality.

I read it. In my opinion the defensiveness isn't more complicated than people knowing or fearing that their racism is wrong by objective standards but they can't help having racist bias anyway. I suspect this is true of most of us.
 
I didnt read the whole article. Yet. I might, might not.

Because this turned me off and indicated bias right here:



Er...exactly which races are good at it? And how so?

I am someone that generally agrees that we are still dealing with institutionalized racism in the US but I'm not just buying into something that smacks of its own smugness and hyperbole without foundation.

Oh, I’d say they are good at discussing why we need voter ID to protect integrity of elections but not more security to protect integrity of voting machines. :roll:
 
Thomas Sowell is an accomplished man of merit and wisdom, the fact you call him a hack show you to be a very shallow person.

He’s a hack.
 
This article might explain it.

https://www.newyorker.com/books/pag...s-from-confronting-racism?mbid=social_twitter



It's probably worth reading the whole article before commenting.


Have to be honest, I expected the worse when I clicked on the link. But I do agree with most of what she said. I just take issue with assuming that every white person is the same. That it's impossible for a white person to not be 'colorblind' and that when one says such, they are only being defensive, or just not aware of it. (I'm paraphrasing.)

She's basically saying that white people can never really be non-racist.

If that's really the case, then there is no hope at all. And I just don't buy that part of her theory, because I know better.

Of course the books author's point “that white progressives cause the most daily damage to people of color.” Not only do these people fail to see their complicity, but they take a self-serving approach to ongoing anti-racism efforts: “To the degree that white progressives think we have arrived, we will put our energy into making sure that others see us as having arrived.” is what many people, including myself, have said in the past.
 
After having read more than enough of this woman's work and even having the unfortunate luck of watching recordings of her seminars.

She is nothing but a kook. Either peddling race and identity politics en masse, as this whole white fragility con is nothing but another means to demean people who can easily cut you down in debate. She has failed when faced with actual people to challenge on these assumptions, not to mention it is wholly illogical to believe that only those who are white. Will be the only ones to implode on such a subject at all.

After releasing the book she became largely a laughing stock among the intellectual community for attempting to pander a theory to the social justice crowd. The book she wrote about this was nothing more than an extended opinion piece and she has repeatedly tried to pass it off as truth, or scientific fact.

Unfortunately, she and her work, are a definite product of recent identity politic tropes.

Perhaps because she pointed out that they themselves, the social justice crowd, were part of the problem? Of course they wouldn't like that. That's the same denial that others are accused of as well.
 
In 2011, DiAngelo coined the term “white fragility” to describe the disbelieving defensiveness that white people exhibit when their ideas about race and racism are challenged—and particularly when they feel implicated in white supremacy.

This is called "Any old excuse will do to attack white people."

:roll:

I talk about racism realistically all the time......but Liberals don't like reality. Unable to refute--they call me a racist.

Immigration is a good example of the Liberal failure to see reality. They see Trump's immigration policy as racist.

Here's the reality:

If it turns out to be racism to carefully choose immigrants and choose only a few of the best qualified.......then racism is good because it improves America.

Letting unqualified black and brown people into America JUST BECAUSE they're black/brown and pathetic is a bad kind of racism......the worst kind.

There's nothing good about it because the dissonant and unAmerican aliens will never assimilate and never be happy in America......they'll just cause problems and raise children that will cause even more problems in the future.

A house divided against itself cannot stand.

A house full of dysfunctional family members who hate each other is doomed to fall into strife and eventually civil war.

Liberals dream of an America that is the color of cinnamon where we all love each other.

It's the dream that's destroying America.
 
Explain what? I don't usually click on links on this forum. I am too lazy. I just read whatever's on the computer screen at the moment.

Please send all of your funds to:

ElChupacabra's Ferrari Fund
P.O. Box 666
Goat Town, GA 31082


VROOM VROOM!!
 
We don't need to have a "talk" about race. We need to have a lecture, with white people listening and people of color talking.

White people are just angry that they can't derail the conversation with "black people have a toxic culture, there's too many fatherless homes, they don't care about school, their communities need more policing, they are genetically less intelligent", etc. All whites who believe anything other than systemic racism creates the gaps between white people and black people in the country need to shamed and silenced.
 
She is stating the obvious. But, sometimes that too needs stating.

What, that whites are evil and people of color are clean and pure as the wind driven snow? Newsflash: Everyone is wicked and evil and the only remedy is found at the foot of the Cross.
 
What, that whites are evil and people of color are clean and pure as the wind driven snow? Newsflash: Everyone is wicked and evil and the only remedy is found at the foot of the Cross.

I'm not wicked and evil.

Have you been programmed by your religion to hate yourself?

The remedy is not at the foot of the cross but instead the remedy is following the footsteps of the one who died on that cross.

When you figure that out you're going to be WAY ahead of where you're at now.

Good luck!!

:)
 
I'm not wicked and evil.

Have you been programmed by your religion to hate yourself?

The remedy is not at the foot of the cross but instead the remedy is following the footsteps of the one who died on that cross.

When you figure that out you're going to be WAY ahead of where you're at now.

Good luck!!

:)

Uhh, Romans 3:10, 23, basically all throughout Scripture there is a clear indictment and conviction of the condition of mankind. Jeremiah wrote that the heart is "deceitful above all things and desperately wicked..." The only solution is not to earn salvation, but to receive it through Christ. it is impossible for man to do good under his own power.
 
We don't need to have a "talk" about race. We need to have a lecture, with white people listening and people of color talking.

White people are just angry that they can't derail the conversation with "black people have a toxic culture, there's too many fatherless homes, they don't care about school, their communities need more policing, they are genetically less intelligent", etc. All whites who believe anything other than systemic racism creates the gaps between white people and black people in the country need to shamed and silenced.

And here, ladies and gentlemen is a prime example of a black racist. People like you make me want to throw up! I was never raised nor taught that skin color matters. I do believe in King's ideal of judging a person by the content of their character and from what I see, you sir, have none!
 
Have to be honest, I expected the worse when I clicked on the link. But I do agree with most of what she said. I just take issue with assuming that every white person is the same. That it's impossible for a white person to not be 'colorblind' and that when one says such, they are only being defensive, or just not aware of it. (I'm paraphrasing.)

She's basically saying that white people can never really be non-racist.

If that's really the case, then there is no hope at all. And I just don't buy that part of her theory, because I know better.

Of course the books author's point “that white progressives cause the most daily damage to people of color.” Not only do these people fail to see their complicity, but they take a self-serving approach to ongoing anti-racism efforts: “To the degree that white progressives think we have arrived, we will put our energy into making sure that others see us as having arrived.” is what many people, including myself, have said in the past.

I believe most of us think in terms of race, and that is racism. The article seems to imply that we fear self-reflecting on that. Maybe, it's that.

Or, maybe it is something more sinister. IMO, the fear might be admitting it publicly because we know that if we do, we will be engulfed by firestorm of criticism.

Examples:

1. When reading about a certain crime, the mind thinks, "Black Dude."
2. When someone completely ignores a police order and gets shot, the response is to think, "Black thing."
3. When a black person graduates from prestigious university, thoughts leap to "Affirmative Action"
4. When black male follows you or is seen hanging out around an establishment, concerns are that "he is up to no good."
5. When a black person comes in for an interview, the first idea creeping into the head is "lawsuit."

The piece suggests the Left progressive will keep these thoughts to himself, bury them even and pretend he doesn't harbor them. And, she's probably right. But...

How many of those progressives would freely admit it if not for the anticipated firestorm which follows said admission?
 
I believe most of us think in terms of race, and that is racism. The article seems to imply that we fear self-reflecting on that. Maybe, it's that.

Or, maybe it is something more sinister. IMO, the fear might be admitting it publicly because we know that if we do, we will be engulfed by firestorm of criticism.

Examples:

1. When reading about a certain crime, the mind thinks, "Black Dude."
2. When someone completely ignores a police order and gets shot, the response is to think, "Black thing."
3. When a black person graduates from prestigious university, thoughts leap to "Affirmative Action"
4. When black male follows you or is seen hanging out around an establishment, concerns are that "he is up to no good."
5. When a black person comes in for an interview, the first idea creeping into the head is "lawsuit."

The piece suggests the Left progressive will keep these thoughts to himself, bury them even and pretend he doesn't harbor them. And, she's probably right. But...

How many of those progressives would freely admit it if not for the anticipated firestorm which follows said admission?
This is why as a Conservative, I said I don't give a rat's ass about skin color.
 
I don't think it's possible to be completely colour-blind/non-racist. If you are white and you prefer your romantic partners to be white as well (this is the case for a lot of white people) then according to the Left, this is an instance of "racism". Not that we should try to please the lefties or anything, but I just want to point this out.
 
And here, ladies and gentlemen is a prime example of a black racist. People like you make me want to throw up! I was never raised nor taught that skin color matters. I do believe in King's ideal of judging a person by the content of their character and from what I see, you sir, have none!

I'm white, Jim Bob. Just because I can understand systemic racism doesn't mean I'm a person of color.
 
Back
Top Bottom