• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:112, 773]The Gun Show "Loophole"

Rich2018 said:
Then what unbiased search might you suggest ?


We're talking about man and woman doing the same job at different pay rates.
Click to expand...

Why did you ... my post, I explained it
 
Rich2018 said:
Er no, what you typed in post #1052 is repeated letter for letter in post #1053

You just lied






???


Again in English


"there is more words..." ???


What does that even mean ?
Click to expand...

Why did you cut off my post?
 
Rich2018 said:
The "second was settled by the 2A" ???


Do you mean slavery was settled by the 2nd amendment? If so, how do you account for slaves as late as 1865 ?
Click to expand...

No I meant the right to bear arms was settled with the 2A.
 
Rich2018 said:
You own guns, you used to be able to own slaves

The connection is "ownership"
Click to expand...

I’ve never been able to own slaves. Your supposed connection is not logical. It’s down right stupid.
 
Glitch said:
There is a logical connection. Those who support banning privately owned firearms also support slavery. After all, you can't own slaves if they are armed. The anti-American gun control nuts want to make slaves of us all.
Click to expand...

Just because you can spin a connection doesn’t make it logical. No offense, that’s no more logical than this “ownership” connection.
 
Rich2018 said:
But your ancestors could if they lived in the USA and were citizens.
Click to expand...

Everyone’s ancestors could regardless of their nationality or citizenship. Still has no rational connection to gun ownership.
 
Rich2018 said:
No it wasn't

You are lying, the proof is there for all to see ?

What was your post? What line or lines do you claim were "cut off"

Stop Lying.
Click to expand...

My post had more information that explained more information, but you cut off half of my sentence and responded to it saying I didnt explain it
 
TypicalRussian said:
My post had more information that explained more information, but you cut off half of my sentence and responded to it saying I didnt explain it
Click to expand...

What information ?

What line or lines do you claim were "cut off" ?

Post it !



You are lying, the proof is there for all to see !!!
NOTHING was "cut off" or edited.


STOP LYING !!!
 
Rich2018 said:
What information ?

What line or lines do you claim were "cut off" ?

Post it !



You are lying, the proof is there for all to see !!!
NOTHING was "cut off" or edited.


STOP LYING !!!
Click to expand...

Why are you in denial? You know you did this
 
TypicalRussian said:
post 1051



the ... had more information
Click to expand...

As I said before, your post #1052 was word for word reproduced in my post #1053


Now you say you post #1051 was edited, the only thing removed was a link that contained no pertinent information.
I only reply the pertinent statements, there was none in post #1051, just a link.

Stop lying

If you say there was something cut off from your post, then what was it ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom