• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Biden leads by 'landslide proportions'

Luther said:
Yes, yes it is.... ONE Tea party organization out of thousands at the time(LOL)




Then explain how the rich pay the majority of the Fed income tax?

Also, doesn't libertarianism conflict with the liberal "collective"?(LOL)
Click to expand...

It doesn't conflict. I just showed you my political ideology. I am against the state for different reasons than right wingers.

As far as the rich, they don't pay nearly enough. I don't particularly care that they "pay" most of the "income" taxes. Their wealth is beyond staggering, and when we talk about plans that benefit the majority of people as individuals, a modest tax increase on them doesn't harm them as much as it helps others.

I have no tolerance for arguments about the rich "keeping their property." Property comes with strings attached; work doesn't solely earn you "ownership" of money. Moreover, more money in the hands of more consumers means more production need for the demand which creates jobs. This is how it has -always- worked. It's never ended well when we continuously "hope" the rich will trickle down some of the money their workers earn for them.
 
bongsaway said:
I can hear the outrage already when the GOP loses the senate and white house to complete the blue wave next election. It's rigged I tell ya'. What would please me more than anything is for trump to get more votes than the democratic nominee and lose because of the electoral college.
Click to expand...

I'm more than convinced if Trump loses this election there will be an uprising among his supporters.
 
Obscurity said:
It doesn't conflict. I just showed you my political ideology. I am against the state for different reasons than right wingers.

As far as the rich, they don't pay nearly enough. I don't particularly care that they "pay" most of the "income" taxes. Their wealth is beyond staggering, and when we talk about plans that benefit the majority of people as individuals, a modest tax increase on them doesn't harm them as much as it helps others.

I have no tolerance for arguments about the rich "keeping their property." Property comes with strings attached; work doesn't solely earn you "ownership" of money. Moreover, more money in the hands of more consumers means more production need for the demand which creates jobs. This is how it has -always- worked. It's never ended well when we continuously "hope" the rich will trickle down some of the money their workers earn for them.
Click to expand...

Historical Average Federal Tax Rates for All Households | Tax Policy Center
 
The way I see it, basically, there only two kinds of people left that still support Comrade Trump.

The uber-rich and the uber-dumbass.

Should anyone wonder what camp they are in, they simply need to check their bank account.
 
Obscurity said:
It doesn't conflict. I just showed you my political ideology. I am against the state for different reasons than right wingers.

As far as the rich, they don't pay nearly enough. I don't particularly care that they "pay" most of the "income" taxes. Their wealth is beyond staggering, and when we talk about plans that benefit the majority of people as individuals, a modest tax increase on them doesn't harm them as much as it helps others.

I have no tolerance for arguments about the rich "keeping their property." Property comes with strings attached; work doesn't solely earn you "ownership" of money. Moreover, more money in the hands of more consumers means more production need for the demand which creates jobs. This is how it has -always- worked. It's never ended well when we continuously "hope" the rich will trickle down some of the money their workers earn for them.
Click to expand...




As far as the rich, they don't pay nearly enough.
Click to expand...

(LOL) The top 1% pay 40% of the Fed income tax... the top 10% pay 60%.... that'S all(Rolling eyes)

It doesn't conflict. I just showed you my political ideology. I am against the state for different reasons than right wingers.
Click to expand...



I guess anybody can just make up a political ideology but I would lose the word "libertarian"



Their wealth is beyond staggering,
Click to expand...

That sir, is none of your business
a modest tax increase on them doesn't harm them as much as it helps others.
Click to expand...

Again, the top 10% pay 60% of the fed income tax while 44% pay nothing(Hello)
 
Luther said:
(LOL) The top 1% pay 40% of the Fed income tax... the top 10% pay 60%.... that'S all(Rolling eyes)





I guess anybody can just make up a political ideology but I would lose the word "libertarian"





That sir, is none of your business


Again, the top 10% pay 60% of the fed income tax while 44% pay nothing(Hello)
Click to expand...

Payroll tax?
 
Geez the Dems are just rolling them out there one after the other at the SCDP, Clayborn shindig today.

Sort of a little odd.

When does the swimsuit competition start?
 
Biden onto his third rationalization for his "Boy v Son" remark.

Oldest rule in politics and certainly one an old dog like you should know. When you are explaining you are losing. When you are explaining this long you are just losing more. You are just digging in the same hole, Joe.....just plain STUPID.
 
jnug said:
Biden onto his third rationalization for his "Boy v Son" remark.

Oldest rule in politics and certainly one an old dog like you should know. When you are explaining you are losing. When you are explaining this long you are just losing more. You are just digging in the same hole, Joe.....just plain STUPID.
Click to expand...

The appointment of a Special Counsel and efforts to remove him. On May 17, 2017, the
Acting Attorney General for the Russia investigation appointed a Special Counsel to conduct the
investigation and related matters. The President reacted to news that a Special Counsel had been
appointed by telling advisors that it was "the end of his presidency" and demanding that Sessions
resign. Sessions submitted his resignation, but the President ultimately did not accept it. The
President told aides that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and suggested that the Special
Counsel therefore could not serve. The President's advisors told him the asserted conflicts were
meritless and had already been considered by the Department of Justice.
On June 14, 2017, the media reported that the Special Counsel's Office was investigating
whether the President had obstructed justice. Press reports called this "a major turning point" in
the investigation: while Corney had told the President he was not under investigation, following
Corney's firing, the President now was under investigation. The President reacted to this news
with a series of tweets criticizing the Department of Justice and the Special Counsel's
investigation. On June 17, 2017, the President called McGahn at home and directed him to call
the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be
removed. McGahn did not carry out the direction, however, deciding that he would resign rather
than trigger what he regarded as a potential Saturday Night Massacre.
 
Captain America said:
Wow. Even FOX and Rasmussen has Biden kicking Trump's ass.

No wonder Trump is having a melt down.
Click to expand...

Politico › election-results › house
House Election Results 2018: Live Midterm Map by State & Analysis - Politico
6 days ago · For Democrats to flip the House, they needed to gain 23 seats. ... Out of the races called so far, Democrats gained 40 seats. ... Among districts with most precincts reporting, their biggest gain was in New Jersey's 11th congressional district
 
DamnYankee said:
Has Creepy Uncle Joe given up pawing at the girls? Snorting their flanks and such?
Click to expand...

Has the Emperor given up grabbing *****?

Look, if you guys want to talk about predatory behavior, ok. It's your funeral.
 
rocket88 said:
Has the Emperor given up grabbing *****?

Look, if you guys want to talk about predatory behavior, ok. It's your funeral.
Click to expand...

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a lot of problems. He has been accused of corruption, failed to assemble a coalition after winning a recent election and now must campaign in another race in September. To make matters worse, his wife is now officially a convicted criminal
 
rocket88 said:
Has the Emperor given up grabbing *****?

Look, if you guys want to talk about predatory behavior, ok. It's your funeral.
Click to expand...

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a significant defeat on Thursday, ruling that his administration did not give an adequate explanation for its plan to include a contentious citizenship question on the 2020 census and preventing its addition to the decennial survey for now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom