Well the so-called leader in the white house now is neither effective or a better person. He's in the pocket of Putin and Russian money.
B. Clinton was a choirboy compared to trump and 10 times the pres. without being the scum trump is and not only
created 22 million jobs while balancing 3 budgets and paid off debt. He left W a good economy but true to repub...had to rape it.
And half a mill is peanuts. Reagan got $2 million for a speech and that was 1989 or 90 IIRC. 6 repub senators went to Moscow
around this July 4th of all dates. Why ? Lining up speeches ?
Oh how the republican brand is now irrevocably heading down the path of the Whigs, into the dustbin of history.
Example: NO evidence, I repeat NO evidence oh but...but: That’s the question raised in the forthcoming book Clinton Cash by author and political consultant Peter Schweizer. On the Sunday shows, Schweizer said that while his research uncovered no proof of a quid pro quo between foreign interests and the 2016 Democratic frontrunner, the evidence does suggest a troubling trend.
The evidence on that standard is that the repubs have almost killed America and has been their 'troubling trend'
since 1980.
Troubling trend my ass. Again, just as in Clinton's trial by the right, and all of 6 years and $60 million got nothing
and the right just gives this guy a pass and the left well now. I mean trump may have conflicts of interest up the ass
and just may be a criminal. But hey, at least there is no troubling trend here. [sic]
I could never imagine even close to 50 million people in America being complete absolute hypocritical godless morons.
You seem to really, really hate Trump.
Your boy Clinton was in office while the .com revolution was unfolding to the benefit of us all. He didn't anticipate this and was as surprised as anyone when the budget balanced much earlier than he had projected.
Bill was responsible for the great economy, but the Bill in question was Gates. Clinton did what needed to be done to help. His contribution was to do absolutely nothing. Same as Eisenhower in the 50's.
Will Trump's policies be good or bad for the country? The Jury is out. We should know something very soon. If the China negotiations work out well, that's good. If not, disaster.
Next year at this time, if we have a robust trade arrangement restored with protections for international intellectual property, that's good.
If we find instead a world wide depression with growing unemployment, that's bad.
The trouble with high risk-high reward moves is that there is high risk. This has been trump's whole life. It's what he does.
In this case, he's doing it at the peak of the economic boom. For him politically, this is VERY high risk. He's doing the right thing at the best time available to him, though.
If Obama had done anything about the China trade problems, the risk might be so great at this time.
Where Obama shirked, Trump worked. Can he pull it off? Time will tell. At least he's trying.
