• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Abortion 201

Quag said:
It was referring to Angel wanting to tell us what is the true moral position,
Click to expand...

Even if he did do this, it's still not invoking religious arguments.
 
Angel said:
Stalk someone else, man. If my argument is mere opinion, what is your opinion of my argument? You've posted the same post a thousand times: "That's just your opinion, Angel."
All right, and that's your opinion. Now stalk someone else.
Click to expand...

Defend your claims or admit they are nothing more than your personal opinion. I am pointing out the lack of logic in your "argument" that isn't an opinion it is LOGIC I suggest you try learning how it works.
 
Wan said:
Even if he did do this, it's still not invoking religious arguments.
Click to expand...

I used the term preach as an explanation of his failure to debate but rather state as fact his personal opinions. The bit about the church was because in a debate forum you expect someone to defend their opinions in a church you are expected to accept the word of the preacher.
 
Quag said:
Defend your claims or admit they are nothing more than your personal opinion. I am pointing out the lack of logic in your "argument" that isn't an opinion it is LOGIC I suggest you try learning how it works.
Click to expand...
You are point out nothing. You're repeating "It's just your opinion" endlessly. Give it a rest. My argument is logic; engage it as such or stalk someone else with your "It's just your opinion" refrain.
 
Angel said:
You are point out nothing. You're repeating "It's just your opinion" endlessly. Give it a rest. My argument is logic; engage it as such or stalk someone else with your "It's just your opinion" refrain.
Click to expand...

No I explain why it is just your opinion but you refuse to actually read what I wrote and so you spew mindless nonsense
Your "arguments" are all based on claims that are nothing more than your personal opinion thus the conclusions are nothing more than your personal opinions..
Try dealing with what I post instead of putting your hands over your eyes and ignoring the glaring logical problem with your so called "arguments"
 
Quag said:
No I explain why it is just your opinion but you refuse to actually read what I wrote and so you spew mindless nonsense
Your "arguments" are all based on claims that are nothing more than your personal opinion thus the conclusions are nothing more than your personal opinions..
Try dealing with what I post instead of putting your hands over your eyes and ignoring the glaring logical problem with your so called "arguments"
Click to expand...
And you're doing it again!
 
Angel said:
You still explain nothing. You express yet another opinion. That is all.
Click to expand...

I have but your misplaced arrogance keeps you from understanding anything
 
Quag said:
I have but your misplaced arrogance keeps you from understanding anything
Click to expand...
So explain it then: why are my opinions using logic not worthy of consideration while your opinion not using logic is worthy of consideration?
 
Angel said:
So explain it then: why are my opinions using logic not worthy of consideration while your opinion not using logic is worthy of consideration?
Click to expand...

I already have muitliple times

But Ill do it again and you will pretend I havent again because you are nothing if not dishonest
I claim A is B
I claim C is also B
I claim has the right to C
Therefore X has a right to B

Regardless of what A,B,C,D are if my claims are not true then then the conclusion is not true.
To make the conclusion true you msut prove the assersions otherwise they are jsut opinions and the conclusion is just an opinion

Now defend your claism or shut up





I suggest you stop pestering me with your ignorance and learn some logic
 
Quag said:
I already have muitliple times

But Ill do it again and you will pretend I havent again because you are nothing if not dishonest
I claim A is B
I claim C is also B
I claim has the right to C
Therefore X has a right to B

Regardless of what A,B,C,D are if my claims are not true then then the conclusion is not true.
To make the conclusion true you msut prove the assersions otherwise they are jsut opinions and the conclusion is just an opinion

Now defend your claism or shut up

I suggest you stop pestering me with your ignorance and learn some logic
Click to expand...
And I suggest you cut out the personal remarks.

There is no D in your argument.
The first two lines of your argument have an undistributed middle term and is thus heading for invalidity.
Your X appears nowhere in your argument until the conclusion, and is thus invalid.
Your talk of soundness is mistaken as regards a schematic argument.
 
Angel said:
You "explain" nothing, sir. You express an opinion. That is all you do.
Click to expand...

This is a perfect description of your acres and acres of unsupported 'arguments' here. This is your behavior, nearly 100% of the time.

Ah, sweet irony.
 
Angel said:
So explain it then: why are my opinions using logic not worthy of consideration while your opinion not using logic is worthy of consideration?
Click to expand...

Yours were considered, challenged, and then you failed to defend them further. All you do is repeat your opinion over and over, even the series of which fail over an over...and then claim everyone else 'doesnt understand' and you avoid direct questioning.
 
Lursa said:
Yours were considered, challenged, and then you failed to defend them further. All you do is repeat your opinion over and over, even the series of which fail over an over...and then claim everyone else 'doesnt understand' and you avoid direct questioning.
Click to expand...
And that is your opinion, or one you borrow from Quag.
 
Angel said:
And that is your opinion, or one you borrow from Quag.
Click to expand...

Your failure is an opinion shared by the great majority..nearly exclusively...of all involved in the threads in this subforum.
 
Lursa said:
Your failure is an opinion shared by the great majority..nearly exclusively...of all involved in the threads in this subforum.
Click to expand...
I'm not a herd animal, ma'am. Your in-crowd is of no matter to me. I'm a majority of one.
 
Angel said:
I'm not a herd animal, ma'am. Your in-crowd is of no matter to me. I'm a majority of one.
Click to expand...

That doesnt change the fact that you completely failed in the opinions of nearly exclusively everyone else :mrgreen:
 
Angel said:
And I suggest you cut out the personal remarks.

There is no D in your argument.
The first two lines of your argument have an undistributed middle term and is thus heading for invalidity.
Your X appears nowhere in your argument until the conclusion, and is thus invalid.
Your talk of soundness is mistaken as regards a schematic argument.
Click to expand...

Sorry different computer there was a D originally
The point remains despite your continued ignorance of logic
If the claims in the premise are not proven then they are just opinions and the conclusion cannot be anything other than an opinion

I strongly suggest you go back to school because you need a GED

Now back up your claims and stop spouting BS in an attempts to divert from your failure to do so
 
Quag said:
Sorry different computer there was a D originally
The point remains despite your continued ignorance of logic
If the claims in the premise are not proven then they are just opinions and the conclusion cannot be anything other than an opinion

I strongly suggest you go back to school because you need a GED

Now back up your claims and stop spouting BS in an attempts to divert from your failure to do so
Click to expand...

Ok, I really want to understand the positions of both of you but dont want to go back to dozens of pages, so could you point to a post # of Angel where you think his premises are not proven?
 
Wan said:
Ok, I really want to understand the positions of both of you but dont want to go back to dozens of pages, so could you point to a post # of Angel where you think his premises are not proven?
Click to expand...

His OP
 
Quag said:
His OP
Click to expand...

Thanks.

I read his OP and I think he is saying that the current laws are wrong, because they allow something wrong to happen, in other words, the laws allow women to deliberately end the life of an innocent live human. I can't say there is anything wrong with this.

Do you think the ending of an innocent live human's life should be wrong?
 
Quag said:
His OP
Click to expand...

And every post after it where directly requested. :2wave:

:lamo

"It's funny because it's true!" (From a favorite comedy)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom