Abortion 201

[Angel]

No I am not.
You are refusing to back up your claims because you know you cannot

Yes, you are -- a thousand posts conflating opinion and falsehood. They're all on record, man. State your objection to my argument in a clear and accurate way, and we can discuss the matter. Frankly, I don't think you want to discuss the matter. I think you're only interested in heckling.

 

[Quag]

Yes, you are -- a thousand posts conflating opinion and falsehood. They're all on record, man. State your objection to my argument in a clear and accurate way, and we can discuss the matter. Frankly, I don't think you want to discuss the matter. I think you're only interested in heckling.

Still no attempt to back up your claims just diversion

 

[Angel]

Still no attempt to back up your claims just diversion

Make a proper objection, showing that you understand what you're saying, and we can discuss the matter.

 

[Quag]

Make a proper objection, showing that you understand what you're saying, and we can discuss the matter.

if you are not going to even attempt to back up your claims you may cease posting as whatever nonsense you post is irrelevant to the discussion

 

[Angel]

if you are not going to even attempt to back up your claims you may cease posting as whatever nonsense you post is irrelevant to the discussion

Don't you want to discuss this? Then just ask the proper question -- man, I've literally given you the proper question in one of my posts! Just repeat it for heaven's sake!

 

[Angel]

This is a perfect description of your acres and acres of unsupported 'arguments' here. This is your behavior, nearly 100% of the time.

Ah, sweet irony.

Yours were considered, challenged, and then you failed to defend them further. All you do is repeat your opinion over and over, even the series of which fail over an over...and then claim everyone else 'doesnt understand' and you avoid direct questioning.

This may come as a surprise to you, ma'am, seeing as the point-of-view you borrow from the national abortion conversation is pretty much devoid of any cogent argument -- it may surprise and even shock you to learn, I say, that an argument is exactly that, namely, the support and defense of a view. Until such time as your reading shows improvement, I suppose I should spell this out for you: an argument needs no support -- it is the support.

 

[Lursa]

This is a perfect description of your acres and acres of unsupported 'arguments' here. This is your behavior, nearly 100% of the time.

Ah, sweet irony.

Yours were considered, challenged, and then you failed to defend them further. All you do is repeat your opinion over and over, even the series of which fail over an over...and then claim everyone else 'doesnt understand' and you avoid direct questioning.

This may come as a surprise to you, ma'am, seeing as the point-of-view you borrow from the national abortion conversation is pretty much devoid of any cogent argument -- it may surprise and even shock you to learn, I say, that an argument is exactly that, namely, the support and defense of a view. Until such time as your reading shows improvement, I suppose I should spell this out for you: an argument needs no support -- it is the support.

It's quite odd you accuse me of your own, consistent, persistent behavior. As you've even quoted (and hopefully read but...it seems it wasnt comprehended)

See the bold, again, for the complete delusion or hypocrisy your statements continue to display. Since the blue "appears" to indicate you understand your own failures...can you explain why you never do what you described in the blue bold?

 

[Angel]

It's quite odd you accuse me of your own, consistent, persistent behavior. As you've even quoted (and hopefully read but...it seems it wasnt comprehended)

See the bold, again, for the complete delusion or hypocrisy your statements continue to display. Since the blue "appears" to indicate you understand your own failures...can you explain why you never do what you described in the blue bold?

See. You don't understand that an argument supports a view. This may be -- I am only guessing, mind you -- because yours is a view in search of an argument.

 

[Lursa]

See. You don't understand that an argument supports a view. This may be -- I am only guessing, mind you -- because yours is a view in search of an argument.

You have not supported your view of your argument. Period. Until you "get" or "admit" this...you will continue to parrot your same diatribe over and over...and the facility of cutting and pasting my responses will continue to show its value.

 

[Angel]

You have not supported your view of your argument. Period. Until you "get" or "admit" this...you will continue to parrot your same diatribe over and over...and the facility of cutting and pasting my responses will continue to show its value.

See. You can't even express the thing properly. "My view of my argument"? Oy!
I have a view, and I have an argument in support of that view.
You may have a view of my argument, and a view of my view, but now it's up to you to support your views with arguments of your own.

 

[Lursa]

See. You can't even express the thing properly. "My view of my argument"? Oy!
I have a view, and I have an argument in support of that view.
You may have a view of my argument, and a view of my view, but now it's up to you to support your views with arguments of your own.

I will...when you do the same. It's your argument. You failed multiple challenges to defend it.

Feel free at any time to address those challenges.

 

[Angel]

I will...when you do the same. It's your argument. You failed multiple challenges to defend it.

Feel free at any time to address those challenges.

What challenges? My argument supports my view. If you don't like my argument, refute it.

 

[Lursa]

What challenges? My argument supports my view. If you don't like my argument, refute it.

We have challenged it many times...that's here for all to see, so this continued lying is just another attempt to deny you failed in your argument(s).

All of them :lamo

 

[Angel]

We have challenged it many times...that's here for all to see, so this continued lying is just another attempt to deny you failed in your argument(s).

All of them :lamo

Refute it.

 

[Lursa]

See. You don't understand that an argument supports a view. This may be -- I am only guessing, mind you -- because yours is a view in search of an argument.

And yet...we have questioned both and you have been unable to defend either.

Dont lie...we have asked you in all ways we can think of...and you continue to post in bad faith. We know you are lying. If you werent, you'd have answered the questions we've asked.

It's up to you if you want to continue...you have failed on every front...but it's your time.

 

[Lursa]

See. You can't even express the thing properly. "My view of my argument"? Oy!
I have a view, and I have an argument in support of that view.
You may have a view of my argument, and a view of my view, but now it's up to you to support your views with arguments of your own.

I express it that way because you've introduced new terms into your posts in order to avoid defending your argument. If you dont like how I 'express' something, retrace your steps to somewhere where you posted honestly. I have no idea such a post even exists but you could try.

 

[Lursa]

What challenges? My argument supports my view. If you don't like my argument, refute it.

We have questioned your argument and you have failed over and over to defend it. We did refute it. You did not respond with anything to defend it. You have endlessly avoided it.

 

[Lursa]

Refute it.

Answer my question, "give me sources that prove your argument is universal and self-evident."

 

[Angel]

We have questioned your argument and you have failed over and over to defend it. We did refute it. You did not respond with anything to defend it. You have endlessly avoided it.

You refuted nothing in my argument. You asserted a thing or two in disagreement, but you refuted nothing. And one more rime, this: I defend my view, with an argument; I don't defend my argument with another argument. It is your job to refute my argument. You have not done this. You have merely expressed your disapproval of my view and you have merely dismissed my argument.

 

[Lursa]

You refuted nothing in my argument. You asserted a thing or two in disagreement, but you refuted nothing. And one more rime, this: I defend my view, with an argument; I don't defend my argument with another argument. It is your job to refute my argument. You have not done this. You have merely expressed your disapproval of my view and you have merely dismissed my argument.

I did. You have not defended your argument. It's ludicrous that you claim you have...I dont remember one other poster actually demonstrating an acceptance of your argument...just perhaps one clinger-on that likes your conclusion.

 

[Angel]

I did. You have not defended your argument. It's ludicrous that you claim you have...I dont remember one other poster actually demonstrating an acceptance of your argument...just perhaps one clinger-on that likes your conclusion.

Ot! Not accepting an argument is a far cry from refuting an argument, ma'am.

 

[Lursa]

You refuted nothing in my argument. You asserted a thing or two in disagreement, but you refuted nothing. And one more rime, this: I defend my view, with an argument; I don't defend my argument with another argument. It is your job to refute my argument. You have not done this. You have merely expressed your disapproval of my view and you have merely dismissed my argument.

..

Answer my question, "give me sources that prove your argument is universal and self-evident."

...

 

[Lursa]

Ot! Not accepting an argument is a far cry from refuting an argument, ma'am.

It was refuted. Then I asked you for your refutation of my argument...which came with sources to support it.

You continue to lie to avoid defending an argument you know has failed.

..

Answer my question, "give me sources that prove your argument is universal and self-evident."

...

 

[Angel]

It was refuted. Then I asked you for your refutation of my argument...which came with sources to support it.

You continue to lie to avoid defending an argument you know has failed.

..

...

"Give me your sources" is not a refutation; it's a non-sequitur. Have you looked up the four words you didn't know the meaning of?

 

[Lursa]

"Give me your sources" is not a refutation; it's a non-sequitur. Have you looked up the four words you didn't know the meaning of?

It was refuted with my argument AND sources that backed it. It was your 'turn' to either refute my argument or admit you failed. You have done neither, choosing instead to pretend you have and then bob and weave to avoid actually doing so.

Again: it's the height of irony to see you beating a personal opinion 'dead horse' on morality all the while lying on a level that reaches clear immoral behavior.