I'm going to try to unravel that verbal knot to see if there's any sense in it. The first part, typos aside, seems to be much blather about nothing since the "epithet" resulted from contracting the full party name and, yes, rightly became a pejorative term for the members of that detestable political movement. Of course they didn't call themselves that at the time but there certainly is one of these hate groups in the US that has no embarrassment in calling itself the "American Nazi Party" so modern nazis do call themselves nazis (you seem to be one of those "low information" types). And, finally, where there's enough similarity between current political parties that refer to themselves as "nationalists" or variations of that term (e.g., in this country: Aryan Nations, National Alliance, National Socialist Movement, Nationalist Movement -- all sharing white supremacist yearnings) it's more than fair to consider them neo-nazi by only slightly different, and sometimes identical, names). There are plenty more neo-nazi white supremacist hate groups in this country than that. Variations of the term "national" or "nationalist" aren't essential to earn the neo-nazi label.
