Yeah, I have never heard anybody say that sex crimes aren't that big of a deal.
Do you mean, could I find someone in this forum saying, "sex crimes aren't that big of a deal"?
No, I'm sure I couldn't. But here is what I keep seeing here over and over:
The people who say that these crimes are just so rare, so we shouldn't be concerned that they will ever happen to us personally.
The people who demand some sort of statistics in advance of liberalizing men's access to women's facilities to support that, in fact, with more opportunity then, more such crimes will occur.
The people who say that, sure, these crimes happen (not in the men's bathroom, of course) but the men get caught (some of them), don't they?
The ones who will triumphantly find ONE example of a woman who was convicted of videotaping women's feet to sell to foot fetishists so they can imply, WOMEN DO IT TOO. lol.
The ones who will imply that the incidence of assault by women in women's restrooms is the same or worse than the incidence of sex crimes by men against women in women's facilities.
The ones who object to using the terms "violence" to refer to these public sex crimes, as if, for instance, being watched or recorded for male sexual satisfaction isn't
really violence against women.
The ones who think that perv men like Carlotta Sklodowska should be able to access women's change rooms because she is a transwoman.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/sex-a...k-goodness-post1066202185.html#post1066202185
I could go on and on about attitudes expressed and implied, but I hope you get my drift.