- Joined
- Jul 9, 2009
- Messages
- 4,111
- Reaction score
- 1,605
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
And from what I've seen, nobody was arrested, so the law wasn't broken, according to your definition.Any of these laws are deliberately written to provide police with wide latitude, so to make any blanket statement as to whether or not YOU feel a crime was committed matters little. What matters is the decision of the police on the scene.
Hold on. You just told me my opinion doesn't matter because the decision of the police on the scene is what matters. Then you tell me your opinion and say they should have been arrested? That is hypocritical. And by the way, #3 on that list you gave applies only to residential areas.(again, from the tapes I've seen, I think arrest would have been in order. Let the courts sort it all out.
Give me a video of protesters doing this at recent town hall meetings.1. Make, continue, maintain or cause to be made or continued any excessive, unnecessary, unreasonable or unusually loud noise or any noise in such manner as to annoy, offend, disturb, injure or endanger the comfort, repose, health, peace or safety of any reasonable person of normal auditory sensitivity residing in the area.
Answer my question about the CNN reporter. Do you think she was stopping free speech and disturbing the peace?
And according to the broad definition you are using, virtually all protests are disturbing the peace. Protests almost always involve yelling and shouting. That is how people protest. You keep ignoring everything I say and only read what you want to read. It is quite annoying and doesn't make your argument any stronger.
Last edited: