- Joined
- Mar 22, 2011
- Messages
- 1,025
- Reaction score
- 319
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
re: Shanksville: THE Smoking Gun & THE Litmus Test [W:348]
It is Yeah.
This thread is about Flight 93, not Flight 77. However, regarding Flight 77 exceeding its structural limits, why not review the work done on this particular matter already. This presentation was given by Calum Douglas, on what the NTSB calls the Flight Data Recorder recovered from Flight 77 at the Pentagon. If you do not understand the parameters of a Flight Data Recorder, or how Calum Douglas, derives his values, then I can open up another thread on Flight 77 and answer your question there.
By the way, I was also a Test Pilot. So, I understand this FDR data and I know that it demonstrates that the aircraft modeled within the data cannot possibly have been from the same Boeing 757-200 the government alleges impacted the Pentagon on September 11th, 2001. We can cover the math, the flight physics and the flight envelope questions at your request in another thread. For now, get yourself up to speed on the FDR vouched for by the NTSB and try to get your head around WHY it makes little to no sense at all, given the official story about what hit the Pentagon.
Explain the Redox Reaction seen here and tell me how it is possible for Redox to ensue mere hours after impact. Also, explain why the intake is facing up and buried in the dirt, when the aircraft allegedly punched a hole in the ground with the intakes facing down. How did the engines manage to stop in mid-air, rotate a full 180-degrees while the rest of the aircraft disappeared into the earth and then drill a hole for themselves - backwards?
This is what an RB211-535 looks like wrecked and fully detached from the engine nacelle:
This is what an RB211-535 looks like fully intact:
Please explain the size differential of the intake and forward compressor sections of each engine and explain why the "official" photo above shows a diameter much smaller than the diameter of any photo below it, showing what a real RB211-535 actually looks like?
We don't get a lot of photos of any recovered physical components of Flight 93, but what we do get clearly points to something other than a Boeing 757-222 as being the object that struck the earth in Shanksville, PA. We can do a more in-depth examination of the component parts seen in the first picture above after you have schooled yourself on these simple question - for which there has never been a good answer from the government.
If you were not so completely deluded about what's going on here, I'd actually comment further. People like you don't want to see the real truth behind commercial airline disasters, so you claim that posting such pictures is not "classy."
911, is not classy either. It was very nasty business - and I do mean business, because it lead to the capture of billions of dollars in PSA contracts still flowing out of Iraq, to this very day.
Wake up.
It is Yeah.
This thread is about Flight 93, not Flight 77. However, regarding Flight 77 exceeding its structural limits, why not review the work done on this particular matter already. This presentation was given by Calum Douglas, on what the NTSB calls the Flight Data Recorder recovered from Flight 77 at the Pentagon. If you do not understand the parameters of a Flight Data Recorder, or how Calum Douglas, derives his values, then I can open up another thread on Flight 77 and answer your question there.
By the way, I was also a Test Pilot. So, I understand this FDR data and I know that it demonstrates that the aircraft modeled within the data cannot possibly have been from the same Boeing 757-200 the government alleges impacted the Pentagon on September 11th, 2001. We can cover the math, the flight physics and the flight envelope questions at your request in another thread. For now, get yourself up to speed on the FDR vouched for by the NTSB and try to get your head around WHY it makes little to no sense at all, given the official story about what hit the Pentagon.
Explain the Redox Reaction seen here and tell me how it is possible for Redox to ensue mere hours after impact. Also, explain why the intake is facing up and buried in the dirt, when the aircraft allegedly punched a hole in the ground with the intakes facing down. How did the engines manage to stop in mid-air, rotate a full 180-degrees while the rest of the aircraft disappeared into the earth and then drill a hole for themselves - backwards?
This is what an RB211-535 looks like wrecked and fully detached from the engine nacelle:
This is what an RB211-535 looks like fully intact:
Please explain the size differential of the intake and forward compressor sections of each engine and explain why the "official" photo above shows a diameter much smaller than the diameter of any photo below it, showing what a real RB211-535 actually looks like?
We don't get a lot of photos of any recovered physical components of Flight 93, but what we do get clearly points to something other than a Boeing 757-222 as being the object that struck the earth in Shanksville, PA. We can do a more in-depth examination of the component parts seen in the first picture above after you have schooled yourself on these simple question - for which there has never been a good answer from the government.
If you were not so completely deluded about what's going on here, I'd actually comment further. People like you don't want to see the real truth behind commercial airline disasters, so you claim that posting such pictures is not "classy."
911, is not classy either. It was very nasty business - and I do mean business, because it lead to the capture of billions of dollars in PSA contracts still flowing out of Iraq, to this very day.
Wake up.
