• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

"Romnesia".

Diversion. A known tea party tactic.

I'll take it as an admission that Romney's tax plan is bogus.

As to your question (which isn't relevant to the issue), its premise is false. Tax policy isn't intended to solve the deficit in a single year or deal with foreign competition. I'm afraid we'll have to do that the old fashion way -- spend on infrastructure and productivity (which taxing the rich and preventing their misallocation of capital will in fact help)

I love these posters that come out of the woodwork right before the election and start attributing membership in various groups to people they have read the posts of for what-15 minutes.

The "missallocation of capital" labors under the socialist idiocy that wealth belongs first to the government

I guess your posts suggest you are just another socialist who is mad that some people have money that they dont want the parasites to waste
 
The problem is that didnt work... Thats why Obama is going to lose in a landslide..

I don't know who will win. The parasiters tend to breed at higher rates than net tax payers and its easy to win elections when you want to give the wealth of the few to the masses-masses that 79 or so years of welfare redistributionist policies have expanded and entrenched in our society
 
I love these posters that come out of the woodwork right before the election and start attributing membership in various groups to people they have read the posts of for what-15 minutes.

The "missallocation of capital" labors under the socialist idiocy that wealth belongs first to the government

I guess your posts suggest you are just another socialist who is mad that some people have money that they dont want the parasites to waste

I love posters like you who can't post on a topic but are reduced to babbling personal attacks.

A sure sign of a loser.

I'll take it this is a further admission that you can't rebut my critique of Romney's bogus plan (and I suspect you don't even know what AMT is)
 
What's fascinating is that conservatives refuse to talk about their hypocrisy, their lack of principle, their absolute political whoredom. Their willingness to support Romney reveals the absolute paucity of principle in modern conservative thought. It's sickening.

You should investigate the term "projection."

I noticed over a decade ago that the DEMs seemed to charge the GOP with the very traits that they themselves were most guilty of. Didn't know there was a clinical word for it until a few years later when I was discussing it with others.

It is amazing to me that otherwise capable people are so blind that they just cannot see themselves as the very definition of the image they try to project onto their opponents.

DEMs have no principles - they proudly proclaim they cannot be held to any moral standard because they don't believe in such things. But a GOPer = who belongs to a party which does emphasize standards in conduct = must be a PERFECT angel with absolutely NO faults.

When you talk about political 'whoredom' you must not notice how the DEMs treat blacks. They use them as cannon fodder to come out and vote and use them to get "outraged" on demand. But they pander to the homosexual community, who the blacks have nothing in common with and are the most virulently opposed to homosexuality. Then they pander to the poor women who are trying to raise a family without a man in the house with promises to 'protect her contraceptives' while doing nothing to help they out of their circumstance.

Talk about hypocrisy? This is the constant descriptor of DEMs for over a hundred years. They were for slavery before they were against it and then they accuse the GOP of being racist. DEMs then jumped to the other side of the racism coin and decided that blacks 'belonged to them' because they provided the "great society" agenda that has done more to destroy the black family than 2000 years of slavery had ever come close to accomplishing. However - as LBJ so eloquently put it = "we will have the "N--" vote forever" and that was his sole intent = harvesting a bloc of voters with no effort. All it takes is a lot of other people's money to keep the scam going. Meanwhile, three generations of black families have been ravaged - culturally, economically, educationally, individually. And what do the DEMs offer the current black communities?? More food stamps, more fake outrage, more made up 'racism.'

No - your description using all those evil-sounding words apply directly to the modern DEM party.
 
I don't know who will win. The parasiters tend to breed at higher rates than net tax payers and its easy to win elections when you want to give the wealth of the few to the masses-masses that 79 or so years of welfare redistributionist policies have expanded and entrenched in our society

I hear ya...I hear ya...
 
I love posters like you who can't post on a topic but are reduced to babbling personal attacks.

A sure sign of a loser.

I'll take it this is a further admission that you can't rebut my critique of Romney's bogus plan (and I suspect you don't even know what AMT is)

you plan on remaining on this forum after the election? AMT-alternative minimum tax

Have you a job? your posts sound like the stuff of unemployed college kids.

I will take it you do not have three ivy league degrees and 28 years of high level litigation experience

trust me kid, you don't want to play your silly games with me
 
I love posters like you who can't post on a topic but are reduced to babbling personal attacks.

A sure sign of a loser.

I'll take it this is a further admission that you can't rebut my critique of Romney's bogus plan (and I suspect you don't even know what AMT is)

I think your post shows an inate ability to jump the shark... hope and change for you is the way!!
 
The Romney proposal is of course a charade. The top brackets already have most of their deductions phased out by AMT. So Romney's plan to cut rates and get rid of deductions, means that the rich simply get lower rates. Deductions are not a factor in the taxes of the top bracket (except the charitable deduction and does he really plan to get rid of that?)

In contrast, the rate reduction for the lower brackets won't be very helpful since rates are already low. It's the mortgage interest deduction and the standard deduction (and a lot of other smaller ones) that reduce the amount of taxes for working people significant.

So it's a fake proposal, of course. Ridiculously, nobody in the debates (including Obama) has called him on this phoney plan.

I think the answer to your question is contained in the question. Obama will not "call him out on it" because Obama knows that to do so would expose the fact he has no facts to base his campaign allegations on.

So you hear Obama say it on the campaign trail and yet wonder why he doesn't confront Romney with it? - Surely you see the answer to that dilemma. Right?? You are bewildered?? I think not.

Oh- and would you kindly point out ANY point of Obama's plan and explain how (as you bemoan the lack of GOP explanations) just how it would help anything.

I note that you said we need to raise the tax on the 'rich' - you need to define that. Do you really mean the uber-rich? Because it that is what you mean, then it has been demonstrated over and over again that there are just not enough of them to make any difference at all. You could CONFISCATE their entire fortunes and you would be able to run the government for less than half a year. THEN, whose money would you confiscate to make it through the rest of the year? That dog won't hunt.

OHHH = you mean to raise the taxes on those going down to 250K - that would indeed bring in a lot of money, but that doesn't sound so good on the campaign trail does it? THAT is the region where all the small businesses reside and it is the small businesses in this country that provide for its prosperity. If you increase taxes on THEM, you kill the job growth.

And it is the millions of wage earners that provide for the bulk of the revenue for this country. We need JOBS - millions of them - to turn this economic train wreck around. Taxing the very source of these jobs will necessarily result in fewer jobs. A vicious cycle that we see taking place in front of our very eyes month after month.

The recent drop in 'unemployment' is NOT the result of robust job creation - it is the result of so many people just giving up looking for a job. There have not been enough new jobs to keep up with the growth in population.

Obama is an abject failure - in every measure by which presidents are gauged.

Obama is the charade - actually 'empty suit' is the preferred pejorative. He came to the presidency to BE president - not to ACT as a president. He is nothing but a community organizer (race-baiter and rabble-rouser) who has fewer credentials that anyone in my memory.

Worship him if you want - but you should be careful not to embarrass yourself in the process.
 
you plan on remaining on this forum after the election? AMT-alternative minimum tax

Have you a job? your posts sound like the stuff of unemployed college kids.

I will take it you do not have three ivy league degrees and 28 years of high level litigation experience

trust me kid, you don't want to play your silly games with me
you have only proved that such purported expertise and experience does nothing to enhance the debating skills of those who consistently show up without anything to say
 
you have only proved that such purported expertise and experience does nothing to enhance the debating skills of those who consistently show up without anything to say

even someone with your bias must be sitting back wondering about the brains of someone who claims Romney is "dull witted"
 
you have only proved that such purported expertise and experience does nothing to enhance the debating skills of those who consistently show up without anything to say

I love these walking thesauri who come strutting in here with their youthful swagger and proceed to step on their own foreskins.

get a grip.

Ohh - and say something pertinent your own bad self.
 
I love these walking thesauri who come strutting in here with their youthful swagger and proceed to step on their own foreskins.

get a grip.

Ohh - and say something pertinent your own bad self.

Rogets and bluster do not make up for a lack of experience.

But on the other hand Justabubba is not a Roget Parrot and he's been around as long as I have. That says something
 
Justabubba is not a Roget Parrot and he's been around as long as I have. That says something

MEA CULPA - I was not paying attention. I thought this was the guy who only had 5 or 6 posts.

Sounded like him anyway.

My apologies to Justabubba on THAT regard.

In fact, I just need to delete the whole darn post.

I just hate it when that happens. :(

nah - I'll just leave it there - would not help to put a blank space. That would make your post without a reference.

Better to leave the dirty laundry out there and hope it smells better in the morning.:doh
 
Last edited:
even someone with your bias must be sitting back wondering about the brains of someone who claims Romney is "dull witted"
i must wonder about the intellect and observational abilities of anyone who would find mitt anything other than dull witted
 
The Obama campaign is an amazing contradiction. By incessantly declaring it is evil for any politician to ever change positions, Obama is promising absolutely that he will do in the next 4 years what he did in the last. Since he had both the house and senate, we know in fact he will not do ANYTHING he promises because he didn't do it and it is - according to him - for any politician to ever change views or agendas.


"Romnesia" is just a partisan hack joke - and that by using the strategy Obama has fallen over 10 points in the polls from where he first started.
 
i must wonder about the intellect and observational abilities of anyone who would find mitt anything other than dull witted

damn man, you are going to make me look bad for sticking up for you. Romney a dullard? top of his class in every school he went to

yeah stupid people make millions investing money

sheez
 
i must wonder about the intellect and observational abilities of anyone who would find mitt anything other than dull witted

If you cannot admit that Romney is brilliant then you are surely letting your political bias blind you to reality.

I suspect you think Obama IS brilliant. I don't share that opinion but I would never call him 'dull-witted.' My problem with Obama is that he uses the intelligence he has to pursue an agenda that is not good for America - IN MY OPINION !!!!

Anyone who would call Romney 'dull-witted' in other than a fit of hyperbole, is not to be regarded as having opinions worth engaging. Sorry - you don't have a dog in this fight.
 
The Obama campaign is an amazing contradiction. By incessantly declaring it is evil for any politician to ever change positions, Obama is promising absolutely that he will do in the next 4 years what he did in the last. Since he had both the house and senate, we know in fact he will not do ANYTHING he promises because he didn't do it and it is - according to him - for any politician to ever change views or agendas.


"Romnesia" is just a partisan hack joke - and that by using the strategy Obama has fallen over 10 points in the polls from where he first started.

this is a brilliant post-one of the best I have seen of late
 
damn man, you are going to make me look bad for sticking up for you. Romney a dullard? top of his class in every school he went to

yeah stupid people make millions investing money

sheez
there are lots of dull witted people of wealth
coming from a wealthy family i would think you would be quite familiar with that reality

let's use you as an example, since you introduced your own CV into this discussion. you insist that you have done quite well for yourself academically and professionally. but while i like you personally, you have never written a post that said to me this was the intellect of an ivy league graduate who has spent a career in law
and i find mitt to be similarly lacking
 
there are lots of dull witted people of wealth
coming from a wealthy family i would think you would be quite familiar with that reality

let's use you as an example, since you introduced your own CV into this discussion. you insist that you have done quite well for yourself academically and professionally. but while i like you personally, you have never written a post that said to me this was the intellect of an ivy league graduate who has spent a career in law
and i find mitt to be similarly lacking

I am a mere peon from the piney woods of Louisiana, and I went to a no-class college LSU with a degree in Electrical Engineering, but I spent 40 years of my life in the company of truly intellectually gifted and dedicated people in the space business at NASA. I know quality in intellect and logic and character.

I find none of that in your posts, most of which I have encountered in this one thread. You may be tearing up the credibility and persuasiveness in other threads - but here you sound like a bell clanging in a windstorm. Nothing of substance.

All you have done is call Romney bad names - and embarrassingly silly since the things you attack are his greatest strengths as seen by everyone but the most jaded of political hacks.

sorry - you are making a spectacle of yourself.
 
The Obama campaign is an amazing contradiction. By incessantly declaring it is evil for any politician to ever change positions, Obama is promising absolutely that he will do in the next 4 years what he did in the last. Since he had both the house and senate, we know in fact he will not do ANYTHING he promises because he didn't do it and it is - according to him - for any politician to ever change views or agendas.


"Romnesia" is just a partisan hack joke - and that by using the strategy Obama has fallen over 10 points in the polls from where he first started.

You would have a point, except that is not what the Obama campaign has done. Rather, what they are complaining about is Mitt Romney repeatedly changing EVERY position -- not infrequently within a period of hours.
 
You would have a point, except that is not what the Obama campaign has done. Rather, what they are complaining about is Mitt Romney repeatedly changing EVERY position -- not infrequently within a period of hours.

remind me-when was Romney spewing rants about the rich not paying enough taxes and that he wants to jack up tax rates on those who pay most of the taxes to begin with

when has Romney demonized success

apologized for American Primacy


bashed America
 
remind me-when was Romney spewing rants about the rich not paying enough taxes and that he wants to jack up tax rates on those who pay most of the taxes to begin with

when has Romney demonized success

apologized for American Primacy


bashed America

I'll give you that he has consistently been a strong advocate for the rich.

The rest, of course, is wingnut lunacy.
 
I'll give you that he has consistently been a strong advocate for the rich.

The rest, of course, is wingnut lunacy.

In your world advocacy for the rich is what?

I guess your post is just moon bat idiocy:mrgreen:
 
Back
Top Bottom