Yes really, thats just how facts work.
So let me see here... You agree with Moot that the cop who shot the man was not black, but the white officer in red?
What? I agree with the fact and moot that the Headline is accurate. Anything you are choosing to make up or deflect to is on you. The headline is accurate and he proved it. You claimed the headline is dishonest but yet you can't prove it. You failed, he won.
You also agree that the man might have mistaken cops with bullet proof vests clearly marked with "Police" on them, as white supremacists out to kill a black man?
Once again your inventions don't concern me. I repeat "I agree with the fact and moot that the Headline is accurate. Anything you are choosing to make up or deflect to is on you. The headline is accurate and he proved it. You claimed the headline is dishonest but yet you can't prove it. You failed, he won."
Your score keeping is as nuts as Moot's delusions are.
It's 100% accurate since its based on what I said and not your fantasies. I repeat" I agree with the fact and moot that the Headline is accurate. Anything you are choosing to make up or deflect to is on you. The headline is accurate and he proved it. You claimed the headline is dishonest but yet you can't prove it. You failed, he won.
So you believe that "cops", aka, multiple police officers shot the man as the headline states, and that is wasn't just one police officer who shot him?
I repeat" I agree with the fact and moot that the Headline is accurate. Anything you are choosing to make up or deflect to is on you. The headline is accurate and he proved it. You claimed the headline is dishonest but yet you can't prove it. You failed, he won.
That headline clearly gives readers a false and misleading impression of what took place, but since it agrees with your ideological beliefs, you also choose to defend it like Moot.
The headline doesn;t do that in anyway, your assumptions on top the headlines does that, not the actual headlines. You also have no clue what my ideological beliefs are, but you are proving my point. You are assuming things and Deming them as true, that's your issue and mistake to deal with. Your assumptions are wrong and moot proved that.
I'm just glad that politics don't distort my reality and take away my cognitive reasoning like it apparently does for you two.
See now this is nothing more than a personal attack and its because you have no ability to honest and unbiased support your claims about the headline which have been proved wrong by multiple posters now.
I repeat" I agree with the fact and moot that the Headline is accurate. Anything you are choosing to make up or deflect to is on you. The headline is accurate and he proved it. You claimed the headline is dishonest but yet you can't prove it. You failed, he won.