• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why can't democrats condemn violence against Christians?

Integrityrespec

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 28, 2018
Messages
26,649
Reaction score
11,896
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Democrats calling it crimes against worshippers, tourists, humanity. They left off what it was and that was a terror act against Christians. They have no problem pointing out crimes against Muslins, so why the difference? Double standard as usual by democrats. It's sad and just another example of how democrats don't practice what they preach.
 
Democrats calling it crimes against worshippers, tourists, humanity. They left off what it was and that was a terror act against Christians. They have no problem pointing out crimes against Muslins, so why the difference? Double standard as usual by democrats. It's sad and just another example of how democrats don't practice what they preach.

Stop! You're making Jesus cry!
 
Democrats calling it crimes against worshippers, tourists, humanity. They left off what it was and that was a terror act against Christians. They have no problem pointing out crimes against Muslins, so why the difference? Double standard as usual by democrats. It's sad and just another example of how democrats don't practice what they preach.

Saying "Easter worshippers", not mentioning Christians, churches and radical Islamic terrorism is meant to sanitize what happened.
 
Democrats calling it crimes against worshippers, tourists, humanity. They left off what it was and that was a terror act against Christians. They have no problem pointing out crimes against Muslins, so why the difference? Double standard as usual by democrats. It's sad and just another example of how democrats don't practice what they preach.

You must have been mad at Trump for not calling it a crime against Christians either.

Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "138 people have been killed in Sri Lanka, with more that 600 badly injured, in a terrorist attack on churches and hotels. The United States offers heartfelt condolences to the great people of Sri Lanka. We stand ready to help!"
 
Christian is of a protected class.
 
Democrats calling it crimes against worshippers, tourists, humanity. They left off what it was and that was a terror act against Christians. They have no problem pointing out crimes against Muslins, so why the difference? Double standard as usual by democrats. It's sad and just another example of how democrats don't practice what they preach.

Because leftism is opposed to Christianity, always has been.

However the name of the game has changed, when leftists took power in France, Mexico, Russia, attempted in Spain (until Franco put an end to that nonsense) Portugal, Cuba, etc they went full on anti-clerical, but the pushback from they got was massive and so now they simply dehumanize Christians and teach their children their traditions are evil in the education system while quietly ignoring their murders across the world
 
Because they are all in the service of Satan. I thought everyone knew that.
 
Democrats calling it crimes against worshippers, tourists, humanity. They left off what it was and that was a terror act against Christians. They have no problem pointing out crimes against Muslins, so why the difference? Double standard as usual by democrats. It's sad and just another example of how democrats don't practice what they preach.
I usually take a look at the motive and impact of the crime, more than which group or individual was the target. If I am not sure what the actual motive was, I am not likely to call anyone a terrorist. There is a distinction between the result of the act which induces terror, and a motive behind the attack which is to cause terror beyond the specific target. If you hope that a larger community, or demographic will be frightened when specific members are attacked, you are a terrorist.
 
I see the usual troll brigade has rolled in. Would someone tell O and Hillary there is no such thing as "Easter worshippers".
 
I see the usual troll brigade has rolled in. Would someone tell O and Hillary there is no such thing as "Easter worshippers".

Why don't you tell them? You can Tweet them. Email them. Send them letters. I'm sure they'd like to hear from you.
 
Why don't you tell them? You can Tweet them. Email them. Send them letters. I'm sure they'd like to hear from you.

Yeah, I'm so sure it would not be a total waste of time, though i did email my support to the WH and received a reply, a form letter no doubt.
 
Yeah, I'm so sure it would not be a total waste of time, though i did email my support to the WH and received a reply, a form letter no doubt.

Your support to the White House for the President not saying this was an attack against Christians?
 
What does that have to do with Trump not using the word "Christian" yesterday when talking about this attack?

What does that have to do with my email to the WH several months ago?
 
What does that have to do with my email to the WH several months ago?

What does your email several months ago have to do with you wanting other people to tell Obama and Clinton that their Tweets upset you yesterday?
 
Back
Top Bottom