• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why can't democrats condemn violence against Christians?

Predictably, we see some Democrats on the forum rushing in to laugh about the murder of Christians. That is 100% predictable.

Every Christian should vote straight Republican in every election for every office or some day the new Democrat Fascist-Socialist Party enforcers may be laughing as they gun down you, your family and your neighbors in a trench as enemies of the state.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Because leftism is opposed to Christianity, always has been.
Click to expand...

That's a complete fail, since myself and millions of practicing Christians are liberal and/or Democrats.
 
Lursa said:
That's a complete fail, since myself and millions of practicing Christians are liberal and/or Democrats.
Click to expand...

You are a self proclaimed “Christian” who reads from the Bible what you want to read. There is no way abortion can be justified under scripture and yet maintaining an unregulated right to kill babies is your biggest political issue that you are the most passionate about. If you espouse heretical beliefs it undermines your claim to being a “practicing Christian”

You would take up arms against Christians in a heartbeat if Roe were overturned.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
You are a self proclaimed “Christian” who reads from the Bible what you want to read. There is no way abortion can be justified under scripture and yet maintaining an unregulated right to kill babies is your biggest political issue that you are the most passionate about. If you espouse heretical beliefs it undermines your claim to being a “practicing Christian”

You would take up arms against Christians in a heartbeat if Roe were overturned.
Click to expand...

The Lord doesnt mention abortion and when He does refer to a woman's pregnant state, He does not consider it murder. He considers reparations to the woman or for the loss of the unborn...much like property.

So dont be dishonest about The Lord's Word on abortion. The Lord values women above the unborn...that's obvious.
 
Acadia said:
Saying "Easter worshippers", not mentioning Christians, churches and radical Islamic terrorism is meant to sanitize what happened.
Click to expand...

Um...uh...Easter is a Christian thing, right?
 
Integrityrespec said:
Democrats calling it crimes against worshippers, tourists, humanity. They left off what it was and that was a terror act against Christians. They have no problem pointing out crimes against Muslins, so why the difference? Double standard as usual by democrats. It's sad and just another example of how democrats don't practice what they preach.
Click to expand...
Same reason Obama wouldn't allow Christians who were being butchered in Islamic countries refugee status, but we could never have enough Muslims.

The idiot Democrats haven't learned a thing from the tragic goings-on in the western EU countries, they truly don't have the brains to comprehend that Islam, a religion whose history proves it feeds itself by conquering non-Muslim countries, is now doing their invading through demographic warfare. They always seem to believe that those who pose the most dangerous threats to us have our best interests at heart.

If they have their way, before they even realize they've screwed the pooch, we'll see Sharia law edging out the Constitution.

Sent from my moto e5 play using Tapatalk
 
  • Who, other than Christians, are Easter worshipers?
    • If bombs killed Ramadan worshipers, I'd know damn well that means Muslims. I wouldn't need to see the word "Muslims" to know that.
  • Surely you/others aren't having a conniption because someone used a compound noun, "Easter worshipers," that's inseparable from the simple noun "Christians?"
  • Are terror events such as the Sri Lanka bombing more or less opprobrious due to whom be slain?
  • How does a nomenclature complaint issue from the same quarters containing conservatives who go all but apoplectic over being asked to use gender neutral pronouns?
 
Integrityrespec said:
Democrats calling it crimes against worshippers, tourists, humanity. They left off what it was and that was a terror act against Christians. They have no problem pointing out crimes against Muslins, so why the difference? Double standard as usual by democrats. It's sad and just another example of how democrats don't practice what they preach.
Click to expand...

It's because they don't care. I don't know if you've noticed. But most of those who are on the left, aren't even close to being in the Christian demographic.

So in most cases, you have democrats taht are all too willing to agree with the harassment, or even the assault of Christians.
 
Oborosen said:
It's because they don't care. I don't know if you've noticed. But most of those who are on the left, aren't even close to being in the Christian demographic.

So in most cases, you have democrats taht are all too willing to agree with the harassment, or even the assault of Christians.
Click to expand...

OK, as long we do not stray into thinking that anti Christians support mass murder. I dislike Christianity as much as anyone but I certainly wish no harm to Christians.
 
Sweden said:
Oh, so it was a "tragedy" like an earthquake or something. Why not face reality? It was the mass murder of Christians by Muslims.

Calling the Sri Lanka bombing victims 'Easter Worshippers' shows just how afraid we are to admit that Christians are under attack
Click to expand...
The Democrats bend over backwards not to offend Islam, which is evidently easy to do, now that Muslims know how to play the identity politics game.

They have no such qualms about offending or even attacking Christians, however, I think in part because Christians believe in one man/ one woman marriage and that offends the tender sensibilities of their LGBTQLMNOP constituency.

Sent from my moto e5 play using Tapatalk
 
Sweden said:
OK, as long we do not stray into thinking that anti Christians support mass murder. I dislike Christianity as much as anyone but I certainly wish no harm to Christians.
Click to expand...

That is completely understandable and a stance that I can willingly get behind.
 
Sweden said:
Oh, so it was a "tragedy" like an earthquake or something. Why not face reality? It was the mass murder of Christians by Muslims.

Calling the Sri Lanka bombing victims 'Easter Worshippers' shows just how afraid we are to admit that Christians are under attack
Click to expand...

Yes, it was a tragedy. You don't think it was?

Here's a definition of "tragedy" to help you understand the meaning of the word.



trag·e·dy

/ˈtrajədē/

noun

noun: tragedy; plural noun: tragedies
an event causing great suffering, destruction, and distress, such as a serious accident, crime, or natural catastrophe.
 
PoppyCock said:
But they are NOT "Easter worshippers"
Click to expand...

So email Obama and tell him to pay for your diapers because his words made you soil yourself. The man doesn't control my life. If he upsets you, take it up with him.

See you at Sunday's worship? Oh, I forgot. Obvious words and meanings confound you.
 
tres borrachos said:
So email Obama and tell him to pay for your diapers because his words made you soil yourself. The man doesn't control my life. If he upsets you, take it up with him.

See you at Sunday's worship? Oh, I forgot. Obvious words and meanings confound you.
Click to expand...

You keep repeating your "upset" strawman BS. Hope you live near a farm store, you will need a good source of straw.
 
Integrityrespec said:
Democrats calling it crimes against worshippers, tourists, humanity. They left off what it was and that was a terror act against Christians. They have no problem pointing out crimes against Muslins, so why the difference? Double standard as usual by democrats. It's sad and just another example of how democrats don't practice what they preach.
Click to expand...

Worshipers.
 
calamity said:
Worshipers.
Click to expand...
Obviously, to a Democrat the brutal murders of a few hundred Christians aren't half as bad as saying something that "offends" a Muslim.

That's why when Islamists perpetrate a terrorist attack, the Democrats will always blame the victims.

Sent from my moto e5 play using Tapatalk
 
Harv said:
Obviously, to a Democrat the brutal murders of a few hundred Christians aren't half as bad as saying something that "offends" a Muslim.

That's why when Islamists perpetrate a terrorist attack, the Democrats will always blame the victims.

Sent from my moto e5 play using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

links, citations, provide something proving the nonsense above was not pulled out of an ass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom