"You're accused-PROVE YOU'RE INNOCENT." Thanks Democrats. Thanks a lot.

[Grokmaster]

Now, all that matters is the "seriousness of the accusation"...NOT THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE/PROOF, and the "burden of proof" is on the ACCUSED.

Thanks DEMOCRATS.


You managed to bring STALINIST METHODS into the US..better than Stalin EVER DREAMED POSSIBLE....

 

[beefheart]

Invoking Stalin? :roll:

Hyperbolic blather

 

[ecofarm]

Applying standards of justice to a job application is absurdly stupid and entitled.

 

[Anarchon]

You're right of course. But, this tactic didn't begin with the Kavanaugh incident. There's a reason there are over 200,000 laws and regulations that can carry a criminal sentence in the U.S., and it's for precisely that reason. The average citizen commits 3 felonies a day, often times without realizing it. The system is designed that the government can now nab anyone that pisses them off, regardless of if they have done anything morally wrong or not. You're just now seeing something entertaining because the target happens to be in government, and different factions are battling over it.

 

[Grokmaster]

Invoking Stalin? :roll:

Hyperbolic blather

Burden of proof on the innocent...is PRECIsELY STALIN, and exactly what the Lie-o-crats are doing now...you weak attempt at dismissal aside.

 

[Grokmaster]

Applying standards of justice to a job application is absurdly stupid and entitled.

Tell that the ACCUSERS, with ZERO PROOF of their accusations.

 

[ecofarm]

Tell that the ACCUSERS, with ZERO PROOF of their accusations.

That doesn't make sense.

 

[Grokmaster]

You're right of course. But, this tactic didn't begin with the Kavanaugh incident. There's a reason there are over 200,000 laws and regulations that can carry a criminal sentence in the U.S., and it's for precisely that reason. The average citizen commits 3 felonies a day, often times without realizing it. The system is designed that the government can now nab anyone that pisses them off, regardless of if they have done anything morally wrong or not. You're just now seeing something entertaining because the target happens to be in government, and different factions are battling over it.

It started will Robert Bork, in our political discourse, and has gotten to the outrageous point that it is now...thanks to the Democrats, EXCLUSIVELY.

 

[Grokmaster]

That doesn't make sense.

Try to keep up.

NONE of Kavanaugh's accusers has a SHRED OF EVIDENCE, yet he is being forced to "PROVE HIS INNOCENCE"...

 

[beefheart]

Burden of proof on the innocent...is PRECIsELY STALIN, and exactly what the Lie-o-crats are doing now...you weak attempt at dismissal aside.

So angry, every day.

That is no way to live.

 

[ecofarm]

Try to keep up.

NONE of Kavanaugh's accusers has a SHRED OF EVIDENCE, yet he is being forced to "PROVE HIS INNOCENCE"...

1. Applying the standards of justice to a job application is stupid.

How does this follow: "tell the Dems".

It doesn't. How would telling the Dems to not apply standards of justice to a job application result in them not making accusations? No way. Your response was nonsense. I can't keep up with nonsense.

 

[Ikari]

Try to keep up.

NONE of Kavanaugh's accusers has a SHRED OF EVIDENCE, yet he is being forced to "PROVE HIS INNOCENCE"...

Try to keep up, Eco's point is it's not a legal trial, it's a job application.

 

[Geoist]

Now, all that matters is the "seriousness of the accusation"...NOT THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE/PROOF, and the "burden of proof" is on the ACCUSED.

Thanks DEMOCRATS.


You managed to bring STALINIST METHODS into the US..better than Stalin EVER DREAMED POSSIBLE....


View attachment 67241471

If I applied for a job and had a certain reputation that the employers found out about I wouldn't expect to be hired.

 

[Geoist]

You're right of course. But, this tactic didn't begin with the Kavanaugh incident. There's a reason there are over 200,000 laws and regulations that can carry a criminal sentence in the U.S., and it's for precisely that reason. The average citizen commits 3 felonies a day, often times without realizing it. The system is designed that the government can now nab anyone that pisses them off, regardless of if they have done anything morally wrong or not. You're just now seeing something entertaining because the target happens to be in government, and different factions are battling over it.

Yeah, if only sexual assault weren't illegal. /s :roll:

 

[Geoist]

Try to keep up.

NONE of Kavanaugh's accusers has a SHRED OF EVIDENCE, yet he is being forced to "PROVE HIS INNOCENCE"...

How is he being forced to 'prove his innocence?' Kavanaugh is not on trial. He is not facing time in prison based on mere accusations.

 

[Moderate Right]

Now, all that matters is the "seriousness of the accusation"...NOT THE STRENGTH OF THE EVIDENCE/PROOF, and the "burden of proof" is on the ACCUSED.

Thanks DEMOCRATS.


You managed to bring STALINIST METHODS into the US..better than Stalin EVER DREAMED POSSIBLE....


View attachment 67241471

Why are you thanking them? This is what they want. This is their goal. Your post brings them joy.

 

[Grokmaster]

So angry, every day.

That is no way to live.

Oh, of course.

I call out leftist outrages; I must "be angry".

Hilarious...Alinsky bull**** is still common practice amongst the DP left. :lamo

 

[Grokmaster]

Why are you thanking them? This is what they want. This is their goal. Your post brings them joy.

sar·casm

/ˈsärˌkazəm/

noun

noun: sarcasm; plural noun: sarcasms


1. the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.

 

[beefheart]

Oh, of course.

I call out leftist outrages; I must "be angry".

Hilarious...Alinsky bull**** is still common practice amongst the DP left. :lamo

blah blah blather bla bla blah....Alinsky!

More idiotic ranting, same old same old.

 

[Grokmaster]

1. Applying the standards of justice to a job application is stupid.

How does this follow: "tell the Dems".

It doesn't. How would telling the Dems to not apply standards of justice to a job application result in them not making accusations? No way. Your response was nonsense. I can't keep up with nonsense.

This is beyond a job application; it is the attempted PERSONAL DESTRUCTION of a man, based on UNFOUNDED ALLEGATIONS.

 

[ecofarm]

This is beyond a job application; it is the attempted PERSONAL DESTRUCTION of a man, based on UNFOUNDED ALLEGATIONS.

It's a job application. Try telling your boss that if he can't prove you're guilty he must promote you. If not getting a promotion is ruining a life, everyone's life was ruined.

 

[Blue Dog]

If one accuses a person of child molestation, it DOES NOT matter whether that person did it or not. It’s the equivalent of destroying a person without putting them in the ground...

 

[Ikari]

This is beyond a job application; it is the attempted PERSONAL DESTRUCTION of a man, based on UNFOUNDED ALLEGATIONS.

He can sue for slander then, possibly push for perjury if it can be proven in court.

 

[Grokmaster]

blah blah blather bla bla blah....Alinsky!

More idiotic ranting, same old same old.

Blah blah blah...ALINSKY, INDEED.


Still thinks your silly attempts to deflect from the ACTUAL TOPIC fool anyone here.


The TOPIC is demanding the ACCUSED PROVE HIS INNOCENCE, instead of DEMANDING THE ACCUSERS PROVE THEIR ALLEGATIONS.


Care to address that, Mr.Alinsky?

 

[ecofarm]

If one accuses a person of child molestation, it DOES NOT matter whether that person did it or not. It’s the equivalent of destroying a person without putting them in the ground...

Totally self serving creepy BS. Some of us would be unaffected by such an accusation. Because everyone knows who we are. If a man's house falls at the first stone, it's his fault.