• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

You want evidence? Bolton book outlines Trump is guilty

Robertinfremont said:
Apparently Democrats accept as FACT that Schiff proved nothing and his screed amounts to innuendo. And thus they NOW want to drag Bolton into this sham.
Click to expand...

I just want to hear all the evidence


Do you?
 
code1211 said:
If you want the truth, start with the bribe made by Biden in the cess pool of Ukraine corruption while he was the "Point Man" for the most corrupt administration in the history of the United States.
Click to expand...

Nothing is Stopping Barr from starting a separate investigation on Biden but Biden's testimony has nothing to do with this impeachment trial
 
Obscurity said:
Because it was not about corruption. It was about political favors.

Your circular arguments are exhausting. I've made my point.
Click to expand...

NO evidence to date has verified the conjecture you just stated. in fact in many ways it has gone against such a belief.
 
code1211 said:
This Impeachment is about the Democrat-Socialists.

Nothing that happened in the real world has been touched on by any of the Managers from the House of Lunatics.
Click to expand...

Which of the articles of impeahment are accusing a Democrat socialist?
 
Obscurity said:
1. It's not a transcript.

2. Hill's testimony, Sondland's testimony, and others, confirm this was a domestic political errand.

Like I said. Release the call; unredacted. Let's hear it.
Click to expand...

A domestic political errand to confirm that the Ukraine was a 'trustworthy' country. One doesn't use future events to prove this one uses past or current events to prove this.

EDIT: I would agree with an unredacted call that doesn't divulge secrets and methods.
 
code1211 said:
If the question is in regard to anything said by the president, it's covered by executive privilege.
Click to expand...

Executive privilege cannot be used to hide misconduct nor can it be used on information in a book that the NSC has granted clearence to publish
 
OscarLevant said:
Trumpsters, suck on this....




DIRECT EVIDENCE.
Click to expand...

In all fairness Oscar, not that many Trumpster's are arguing that he was not guilty of this. They argue it does not merit kicking Trump out of office. Since it wasn't a democrat illegally tampering with the election, they really do not care. Lord Trump gets a pass on all transgressions as long as he keeps pissing off democrats, liberals, women and mexicans.

I think very few people actually deny he is guilty.
 
Luckyone said:
You are forgetting and tossing aside the fact that in Bolton's book he states that Trump did what he is being accused of. That means that anything Pelosi did or did not do is no longer important. This is about the guilt or not of Trump abusing his power for what he is being impeached for according to the Constitution (no longer by Pelosi).........and now there is undeniable truth that he did. Pelosi is no longer important.
Click to expand...

Now you just have to get Bolton to say so UNDER OATH

good luck with said quest
 
code1211 said:
Is it corrupt to discuss options?

Obviously, the threat to withhold anything from the Ukrainians was not made to the Ukrainians since they didn't know about it.

The aid was delivered before the deadline.

The action claimed to be the predicate to initiate the payment was never accomplished.

There was no offer, no acceptance and no consideration.

What are you guys talking about?
Click to expand...

successful execution of abuse of power is not required for conviction
 
Robertinfremont said:
Apparently Democrats accept as FACT that Schiff proved nothing and his screed amounts to innuendo. And thus they NOW want to drag Bolton into this sham.
Click to expand...

"Drag Bolton into this sham"?

Bolton did not write his book because he was forced to by the Democrats. He wrote his both on his own volition and the Democrats had nothing to do with it.

Bolton is saying that Trump is "guilty of what he is being accused of by Constitutional standards" and that has absolutely nothing to do with the Democrats. All they did is bring him up to trial. At that moment, it becomes all about guilt or innocence and Bolton (first hand knowledge witness) is saying "he is guilty".

You should see a doctor about the Democrat obsessions you are suffering from and start being a patriot about not allowing a president to do whatever he wants which is to follow the Constitution as written 247 years ago!
 
vegas giants said:
You did not hear from Bolton. He wants to testify.


Why not hear his testimony?
Click to expand...

Does he really? Has he petitioned the Senate to testify?

It is not time yet to vote for witnesses. First the Republicans get to refute Schiff and his mob.
 
Robertinfremont said:
Does he really? Has he petitioned the Senate to testify?

It is not time yet to vote for witnesses. First the Republicans get to refute Schiff and his mob.
Click to expand...

You do not petition the senate to testify. You are called.


Do you want to hear his testimony?
 
Luckyone said:
"Drag Bolton into this sham"?

Bolton did not write his book because he was forced to by the Democrats. He wrote his both on his own volition and the Democrats had nothing to do with it.

Bolton is saying that Trump is "guilty of what he is being accused of by Constitutional standards" and that has absolutely nothing to do with the Democrats. All they did is bring him up to trial. At that moment, it becomes all about guilt or innocence and Bolton (first hand knowledge witness) is saying "he is guilty".

You should see a doctor about the Democrat obsessions you are suffering from and start being a patriot about not allowing a president to do whatever he wants which is to follow the Constitution as written 247 years ago!
Click to expand...

The book is not out. All that has been discussed is a reported rough draft.

The Senate will later take up the witness discussion. Why are you assuming Bolton will harm Trump?

I only obsess that Democrats are hurting this country. When they stop, I will not need to mention what they do wrong to this country.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom