You want evidence? Bolton book outlines Trump is guilty

[Obscurity]

He will be overruled by the senate and executive privilege will stay in place.
have a nice day.

You do not get to claim privilege in something like this.

It will not stand.

 

[ludin]

Bolton's lawyer confirmed that the manuscript was leaked. The only way he does that is if the information in the New York Times article was accurate to the manuscript. If it wasn't he wouldn't have said anything.

SO far we have found out that these leaks are less than reliable. that they never leak the entire thing but only bits and pieces that they want to leak.

 

[KLATTU]

Uh -oh. another Dem 'smoking gun"
What are we up to now?
59 of them?

Lie the other 58 it will probablt be a:


LAFFRIOT!!!

 

[joko104]

Agreed... Subpoena the book and Bolton and have him testify under oath. Can we get your support for finding out the truth?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

As long as the Democrats can get a federal court to rule on executive privilege by the day after tomorrow that might work.

 

[BlueTex]

Yeah, this is downright rotten now. If the republicans enable this, it's going to supercharge the office of the presidency. If any time there was a merit for removal it is now.

Bolton must be called. If he isn't called, the republic no longer exists. Trump will be acquitted, and presidents will be able to bend the might of the most powerful office in the land to endlessly investigate political rivals - something you only see in authoritarian regimes.

This is the pinnacle. Will the republicans jump off, for some temporary power, or will they uphold the vision of the founders?

Sad to say, but I believe they're poised to jump. They have convinced their audience nothing but cartoon like evidence of Trump ordering it and admitting "I am bribing you, this is how the bribe works, I mean to do this with corrupt intent" will prove his guilt.

This is beyond, beyond acceptable; they know it, but they don't give a damn. To them, keeping democrats out of power is more important than shattering the constitutional restraints on the office of the president.

This is literally a constitutional crisis if ever there was one. If the senate acquits the democrats must immediately order new subpoena for Bolton, Mulveney, etc, and ram this through the courts as fast as possible. This precedent cannot be allowed to stand if you value freedom.

Republicans should remember that what they enable now will be powers that a Democrat will someday enjoy..,


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[BlueTex]

As long as the Democrats can get a federal court to rule on executive privilege by the day after tomorrow that might work.

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court can rule on executive privilege in minutes.. He is sitting right there...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ludin]

Why?

Bolton is recognized by the Democrat-Socialists a war mongering Neo-Con who espouses ideas that have been dismissed by the Democrat-Socialists for years.

Why are the reports of the words written in an unpublished manuscript now considered to be 100% reliable?

because these sycophants will latch onto anything like leeches to feed their TDS.
there is no stopping them at all they have lost all ability to use any kind of logical or critical thinking skills.

 

[ludin]

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court can rule on executive privilege in minutes.. He is sitting right there...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He can be overturned by the senate in seconds as they are sitting right there.
once again you prove you don't know what you are talking about.

 

[ludin]

You do not get to claim privilege in something like this.

It will not stand.

sure it will. Roberts will be overruled and it will stand.
not sure what about this you don't understand.

 

[Moonglow]

Trumpsters, suck on this....




DIRECT EVIDENCE.

It is a waste of time trying to convince cult followers that a crime was committed.

 

[humbolt]

Biden could be corrupt as hell and it wouldn’t change one thing about abusing the office of the president by withholding the aid. Are your morals that pathetic? Why was aid not withheld the year before? Or the year before that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You've yet to prove Trump abused power, so don't lecture me about morals. You seem to believe Trump is presumed guilty, which is indicative of the ignorance of due process practiced in the House in this matter. If your side is going to ignore such things, don't presume to lecture others on moral behavior. In fact, you could produce the earlier "evidence" one of your managers claimed to have, but never produced. Is Schiff lying? Morals. Pffft. You guys don't have any notion what that might mean.

 

[ttwtt78640]

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court can rule on executive privilege in minutes.. He is sitting right there...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are you kidding me? Would you also accept his ruling (as a unanimous SCOTUS decision "in minutes"?) on any other matters?

 

[KLATTU]

As long as the Democrats can get a federal court to rule on executive privilege by the day after tomorrow that might work.

It's not hard to find an activist liberal judge who will rule based on desired result. A day might be too quick ,though!

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Suddenly Bolton is a source of truth and light for the left.

Looks to me like he's just following the Comey plan to cash in.

Bolton is well known for being an asshole and hawk, not for lying.

 

[Risky Thicket]

Rush and Sean.

Sadly that is correct. Talking heads are their arbiters of truth.

 

[joko104]

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court can rule on executive privilege in minutes.. He is sitting right there...

And the reason the Democratic prosecutors haven't done that is? :roll:

 

[BlueTex]

He can be overturned by the senate in seconds as they are sitting right there.
once again you prove you don't know what you are talking about.

He can be overturned but not on legal grounds.. The senate vote is not based on the legality of the assertion.

Cite ONE case where a court has upheld an executive privilege claim on a former official.. Just one..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[vegas giants]

And the reason the Democratic prosecutors haven't done that is? :roll:

No executive privilege has been exercised at trial yet.


Call the witnesses

 

[BlueTex]

And the reason the Democratic prosecutors haven't done that is? :roll:

Have any witnesses even been called?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[vegas giants]

He can be overturned by the senate in seconds as they are sitting right there.
once again you prove you don't know what you are talking about.

That is true. Let them do it



Call the witnesses

 

[BlueTex]

Are you kidding me? Would you also accept his ruling (as a unanimous SCOTUS decision "in minutes"?) on any other matters?

Are PUBLISHED statements in a book covered by executive privilege? I’d love to see a lawyer argue that anywhere.. LMAO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Risky Thicket]

You've yet to prove Trump abused power, so don't lecture me about morals. You seem to believe Trump is presumed guilty, which is indicative of the ignorance of due process practiced in the House in this matter. If your side is going to ignore such things, don't presume to lecture others on moral behavior. In fact, you could produce the earlier "evidence" one of your managers claimed to have, but never produced. Is Schiff lying? Morals. Pffft. You guys don't have any notion what that might mean.

The correct way to settle it would be to have fact witnesses and relevant documents, wouldn’t you agree?

 

[vegas giants]

I want a judgement on what the House claimed was sufficient. If you want to look at new evidence, have at it. Come back to the Senate if you find anything with new aeticles.

No need for that. The Senate can hear new evidence at any time.


You just have to want to hear all the evidence

 

[ludin]

Bolton is well known for being an asshole and hawk, not for lying.

Bull crap you guys were railing your heads off on how dishonest and what a hack he is still you get s sniff of some anti-trump
stuff and then he is a hero. just like comey. He was the devil and the biggest evil since satan when he was investigating clinton.
that he should have been fired etc ... until he went anti-trump then he was hoisted on chairs.

so please spare us if we don't believe the rhetoric.

 

[BlueTex]

sure it will. Roberts will be overruled and it will stand.
not sure what about this you don't understand.

Are you arguing that a PUBLISHED statement is covered by executive privilege? Now, sit back and think about what you are arguing here..




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk